$scope.populateMap=[{name: "ABC", code: "123"}, {name: "XYZ", code: "345"}]
//Want to send model name + value of model Currently sending ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj
HTML
<select ng-model="ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj" ng-change="ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj">
<option></option>
<option ng-repeat="i in populateMap" value="{{i}}">{{i.name}}</option>
JS
// CONTROLLER CODE JSON parse object to get name and code GOT parsedObj
$scope.genericSetLookups=function (Obj) { // want to do something like get the ngmodel string + the value, currently only value comes in
Obj.code=parsedObj.code;
Obj.name=parsedObj.name
};
More Explanation: ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj
- I want in my model to store value of lookups in a specific way, with name and code. On the UI I populate using ng-repeat , So when I select a particular value I can either take i.name as display and set value as i.code .
- But if i do that my ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj.name will be null and the value will get set to ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj.code by using ng-model ,so that is the reason in value I am taking i, not i.code or i.value ,now in the map i have code and name pair.
- I sent it to a function and parse it, and set the value to ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj.code=inputTofunc.code respectively for name. In this case in the ng-change i pass on the ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj.code ,rather i want to set i from the map to ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj send it to function also the model string which in this case would be "ngObject.MainObj.specificFormatObj" .
- So for 10 lookups i can write a generic code ,where the model name and model value i can send as parameter to function and set it there, the above way am doing is probably hardcoding values which i want to set to model in a specific format.