Let T = {<M> | M is a TM that accepts wr whenever it accepts w}.
Show that T is undecidable.
I have two answers to this question - San Diego:
5.9
Let T = { <M> | M is a TM that accepts wr whenever it accepts w }.Assume T is decidable and let decider R decide T. Reduce from ATM by constructing a TM S as follows:
- S: on input <M,w>
- create a TM Q as follows:
On input x:
- if x does not have the form 01 or 10 reject.
- if x has the form 01, then accept.
- else (x has the form 10), Run M on w and accept if M accepts w.
- Run R on
- Accept if R accepts, reject if R rejects.
Because S decides ATM, which is known to be undecidable, we then know that T is not decidable
Undisclosed source:
5.12 We show that ATM ≤m S by mapping ‹M, w› to ‹M'› where M' is the following TM:
- M' = “On input x:
- If x = 01 then accept.
- If x ≠ 10 then reject.
- If x = 10 simulate M on w.
If M accepts w then accept; if M halts and rejects then reject.”If ‹M, w› ∈ ATM then M accepts w and L(M') = {01,10}, so ‹M'› ∈ S.
Conversely, if ‹M, w› ∉ ATM then L(M') = {01}, so ‹M'› ∉ S. Therefore,
‹M, w› ∈ ATM ⇔ ‹M'› ∈ S.
But I do not understand the following:
1- what is the relation between x and w?
2- why we consider the 2 cases ‹M, w› ∈ ATM and ‹M, w› ∉ ATM?
3- why if A is mapping reducible to S this makes S undecidable?
could anyone clarify these points for me?