2

I need some common behaviors in all controllers. Is a good idea have a BaseController and make all controllers extend that class? If so, What is the correct way to avoid the Fatal error: Class 'BaseController' not found error.

tereško
  • 58,060
  • 25
  • 98
  • 150
texai
  • 3,696
  • 6
  • 31
  • 41

4 Answers4

7

It's certainly a common approach.

But an article by ZF project lead Matthew Weier O'Phinney explains how action-helpers can provide the same benefits with more flexibility.

In particular, a common base controller often becomes a dumping ground for functionality that is used in multiple-but-not-all controllers, so it become overkill. Action-helpers are kind of a lazy-load alternative, invoking functionality precisely when and where you need it.

Also, the action-helper dispatch hooks - init(), preDispatch() and postDispatch() - allow you to automate plugin-like functionality on a per-controller basis.

I'd go action-helpers. But as with most things, YMMV. ;-)

David Weinraub
  • 14,144
  • 4
  • 42
  • 64
4

No, don't do that. Use action helpers to add functionnality to your controller. If you use a base controller, it will quickly become complicated and unsable. Action helpers allow more flexibility.

Maxence
  • 12,868
  • 5
  • 57
  • 69
3

Yes, this is a good idea and a very common pattern. Check out Subclassing the Action Controller section of the reference ZF manual.

coreyward
  • 77,547
  • 20
  • 137
  • 166
2

Yes it is good idea.

What is the correct way to avoid the Fatal error: Class 'BaseController' not found error.

You sholud read more about Zend_Loader, to avoid this error

Weltkind
  • 687
  • 5
  • 9