I need some common behaviors in all controllers. Is a good idea have a BaseController and make all controllers extend that class? If so, What is the correct way to avoid the Fatal error: Class 'BaseController' not found
error.
-
What's the path to this `BaseController` class? – takeshin Feb 19 '11 at 12:47
4 Answers
It's certainly a common approach.
But an article by ZF project lead Matthew Weier O'Phinney explains how action-helpers can provide the same benefits with more flexibility.
In particular, a common base controller often becomes a dumping ground for functionality that is used in multiple-but-not-all controllers, so it become overkill. Action-helpers are kind of a lazy-load alternative, invoking functionality precisely when and where you need it.
Also, the action-helper dispatch hooks - init()
, preDispatch()
and postDispatch()
- allow you to automate plugin-like functionality on a per-controller basis.
I'd go action-helpers. But as with most things, YMMV. ;-)

- 14,144
- 4
- 42
- 64
No, don't do that. Use action helpers to add functionnality to your controller. If you use a base controller, it will quickly become complicated and unsable. Action helpers allow more flexibility.

- 12,868
- 5
- 57
- 69
Yes, this is a good idea and a very common pattern. Check out Subclassing the Action Controller section of the reference ZF manual.

- 77,547
- 20
- 137
- 166
Yes it is good idea.
What is the correct way to avoid the Fatal error: Class 'BaseController' not found error.
You sholud read more about Zend_Loader, to avoid this error

- 687
- 5
- 9