If you are prepared to accept
{ 1=>[0], 3=>[1], 4=>[2], 5=>[3], 6=>[4,5,6] }
as the return value you may write the following.
array.each_with_index.group_by(&:first).transform_values { |v| v.map(&:last) }
#=> {1=>[0], 3=>[1], 4=>[2], 5=>[3], 6=>[4, 5, 6]}
The first step in this calculation is the following.
array.each_with_index.group_by(&:first)
#=> {1=>[[1, 0]], 3=>[[3, 1]], 4=>[[4, 2]], 5=>[[5, 3]], 6=>[[6, 4], [6, 5], [6, 6]]}
This may help readers to follow the subsequent calculations.
I think you will find this return value generally more convenient to use than the one given in the question.
Here are a couple of examples where it's clearly preferable for all values to be arrays. Let:
h_orig = { 1=>0, 3=>1, 4=>2, 5=>3, 6=>[4,5,6] }
h_mod { 1=>[0], 3=>[1], 4=>[2], 5=>[3], 6=>[4,5,6] }
Create a hash h
whose keys are unique elements of array
and whose values are the numbers of times the key appears in the array
h_mod.transform_values(&:count)
#=> {1=>1, 3=>1, 4=>1, 5=>1, 6=>3}
h_orig.transform_values { |v| v.is_a?(Array) ? v.count : 1 }
Create a hash h
whose keys are unique elements of array
and whose values equal the index of the first instance of the element in the array.
h_mod.transform_values(&:min)
#=> {1=>0, 3=>1, 4=>2, 5=>3, 6=>4}
h_orig.transform_values { |v| v.is_a?(Array) ? v.min : v }
In these examples, given h_orig
, we could alternatively convert values that are indices to arrays containing a single index.
h_orig.transform_values { |v| [*v].count }
h_orig.transform_values { |v| [*v].min }
This is hardly proof that it is generally more convenient for all values to be arrays, but that has been my experience and the experience of many others.