Is there a good way to replace placeholders with dynamic data ? I have tried loading a template and then replaced all {{PLACEHOLDER}}-tags, with data from the meta object, which is working. But if I need to add more placeholders I have to do it in code, and make a new deployment, so if it is possible I want to do it through the database, like this:
Table Placeholders
ID, Key (nvarchar(50), Value (nvarchar(59))
1 {{RECEIVER_NAME}} meta.receiver
2 {{RESOURCE_NAME}} meta.resource
3 ..
4 .. and so on
the meta is the name of the parameter sent in to the BuildTemplate method.
So when I looping through all the placeholders (from the db) I want to cast the value from the db to the meta object. Instead of getting "meta.receiver", I need the value inside the parameter.
GetAllAsync ex.1
public async Task<Dictionary<string, object>> GetAllAsync()
{
return await _context.EmailTemplatePlaceholders.ToDictionaryAsync(x => x.PlaceholderKey, x => x.PlaceholderValue as object);
}
GetAllAsync ex.2
public async Task<IEnumerable<EmailTemplatePlaceholder>> GetAllAsync()
{
var result = await _context.EmailTemplatePlaceholders.ToListAsync();
return result;
}
sample not using db (working))
private async Task<string> BuildTemplate(string template, dynamic meta)
{
var sb = new StringBuilder(template);
sb.Replace("{{RECEIVER_NAME}}", meta.receiver?.ToString());
sb.Replace("{{RESOURCE_NAME}}", meta.resource?.ToString());
return sb.ToString();
}
how I want it to work
private async Task<string> BuildTemplate(string template, dynamic meta)
{
var sb = new StringBuilder(template);
var placeholders = await _placeholders.GetAllAsync();
foreach (var placeholder in placeholders)
{
// when using reflection I still get a string like "meta.receiver" instead of meta.receiver, like the object.
// in other words, the sb.Replace methods gives the same result.
//sb.Replace(placeholder.Key, placeholder.Value.GetType().GetField(placeholder.Value).GetValue(placeholder.Value));
sb.Replace(placeholder.Key, placeholder.Value);
}
return sb.ToString();
}
I think it might be a better solution for this problem. Please let me know!