8

Im doing an assignment on building a binary tree from the preorder and inorder traversals (a char in each Node) and im trying to wrap my brain around how to build the actual tree.

Here is my thought process on how to accomplish this:

  1. store the first entry in the preorder as the root node
  2. search the inorder for that entry.
  3. take the chars to the left of the root node and save them as a char array.
  4. take the chars to the right of the root node and save them as a char array.
  5. make a new tree, with the root as the parent and its 2 children being the left and right char arrays.
  6. keep going recursively until the preorder length is 0.

I have steps 1-4 taken care of, but im not too sure how to properly build my tree, and was wondering if anyone had any pointers. Thank you.

Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'
  • 104,111
  • 38
  • 209
  • 254
jfisk
  • 6,125
  • 20
  • 77
  • 113

5 Answers5

6

Do the recursion before building the new tree. So, your list would look like this:

  1. If the arrays have length 1, just return a leaf node with this single item in it. (This is the recursion foundation.) (O(1))
  2. Store the first entry in the preorder array as the root node. (O(1))
  3. Search the inorder array for that entry. (O(n))
  4. Take the chars to the left of the root node in the inorder array and save them as a char array. Take the same amount of characters from the preorder array (after the root). (O(n), or O(1) when just throwing pointers/indexes around.)
  5. Take the chars to the right of the root node and save them as a char array. Take the same amount of characters from the preorder array (after the first part – that should be just the remainding part). (O(n), or O(1) when just throwing pointers/indexes around.)
  6. Recursively make a tree from both left char arrays.
  7. Recursively make a tree from both right char arrays.
  8. Combine both trees with your root node. (O(1).)

The non-recursive parts can be done in O(n) overall, and summing them up for each recursion level is also O(n) each. The total runtime thus depends on the number of recursion levels. If you have a approximately balanced tree, the depth is O(log n), thus we get to O(n · log n) at all. As the only necessarily slow part is the search of the root node in the inorder array, I guess we could optimize that even a bit more if we know more about the tree.

In the worst case we have one recursion level for each node in the tree, coming to complexity O(n·n).

Example: Preorder ABCDEF, Inorder FEDCBA, Tree:

                                   +---+
                                   | A |
                                   ++--+
                                    |
                            +---+   |
                            | B +<--+
                            ++--+
                             |
                     +---+   |
                     | C +<--+
                     ++--+
                      |
              +---+   |
              | D +<--+
              ++--+
               |
       +---+   |
       | E +<--+
       ++--+
        |
+---+   |
| F +<--+
+---+
Paŭlo Ebermann
  • 73,284
  • 20
  • 146
  • 210
  • This is a pretty cool method. But you will have to partition both the in-order and pre-order sequences, no? – Andre Artus Apr 20 '11 at 15:22
  • Yes, seems so. I think this is easy, since you can get the partition sizes for the preorder from the inorder partition. – Paŭlo Ebermann Apr 20 '11 at 15:42
  • You are right, it is easy. One just needs to ensure that the partitioning is done correctly. Your way is the easiest way to do it on paper. – Andre Artus Apr 20 '11 at 16:34
  • @Paŭlo Ebermann - Is the run time better than O(n*n) ? n=total number of nodes in the tree – KGhatak Oct 04 '16 at 09:39
  • @BuckCherry I don't have a proof and I'm currently not in the mood for actually creating one. I would guess the best case (balanced tree) is something like `O(n· log n)`. Worst case will likely be `O(n²)` (something like just a linked list, i.e. where the root node is always last in the search). – Paŭlo Ebermann Oct 04 '16 at 21:26
0

You can use the below code, I just wrote for the same problem. It works for me.

public class TreeFromInorderAndPreOrder {

public static List<Integer> inOrder = new ArrayList<Integer>();
public static List<Integer> preOrder = new ArrayList<Integer>();

public static void main(String[] args) {

    Node root = new Node();
    root.createRoot(5);
    for(int i = 0 ; i < 9 ; i++){
        if(i != 5){
            root.insert(i);
        }
    }

    inOrder(root);
    preOrder(root);
    for(Integer temp : inOrder){
        System.out.print(temp +  " ");
    }

    System.out.println();
    for(Integer temp : preOrder){
        System.out.print(temp + " ");
    }

    Node node1 = null;
    node1 = reConstructTree(root, (ArrayList<Integer>) inOrder, true);

    System.out.println();
    inOrder(node1);
    for(Integer temp : inOrder){
        System.out.print(temp +  " ");
    }

    System.out.println();

    for(Integer temp : preOrder){
        System.out.print(temp + " ");
    }

}

public static void inOrder(Node node){

    if(node!= null){
        inOrder(node.leftchild);
        inOrder.add(node.key);
        inOrder(node.rightChild);
    }

}

public static void preOrder(Node node){

    if(node != null){
        preOrder.add(node.key);
        preOrder(node.leftchild);
        preOrder(node.rightChild);
    }

}

public static Node reConstructTree(Node root, ArrayList<Integer> inOrder, 
    boolean  isLeft){

    if(preOrder.size() != 0 && inOrder.size() != 0){
        return null;
    }

    Node node = new Node();
    node.createRoot(preOrder.get(0));
    if(root != null && isLeft){
        root.leftchild = node;          
    }else if(root != null && !isLeft){
        root.rightChild = node;
    }
    int indx = inOrder.get(preOrder.get(0));
    preOrder.remove(0);
    List<Integer> leftInorder = getSublist(0, indx);
    reConstructTree(node, (ArrayList<Integer>) leftInorder, true);
    List<Integer> rightInorder = getSublist(indx+1, inOrder.size());
    reConstructTree(node, (ArrayList<Integer>)rightInorder, false);
    return node;

}

public static ArrayList<Integer> getSublist(int start, int end){
    ArrayList<Integer> list = new ArrayList<Integer>();
    for(int i = start ; i < end ; i++){
        list.add(inOrder.get(i));
    }

    return list;
}
}
ASingh
  • 475
  • 1
  • 13
  • 24
0

I have written a sample program using divide and conquer approach using recursion in java

import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.Queue;

public class BinaryTreeNode {

private char data;
public char getData() {
    return data;
}
public void setData(char data) {
    this.data = data;
}
public BinaryTreeNode getLeft() {
    return left;
}
public void setLeft(BinaryTreeNode left) {
    this.left = left;
}
public BinaryTreeNode getRight() {
    return right;
}
public void setRight(BinaryTreeNode right) {
    this.right = right;
}
private BinaryTreeNode left;
private BinaryTreeNode right;

public static void levelTravesal(BinaryTreeNode node)
{
    Queue queue = new LinkedList();

    if(node == null)
        return;
    queue.offer(node);
    queue.offer(null);
    int level =0;
    while(!queue.isEmpty())
    {
        BinaryTreeNode temp = (BinaryTreeNode) queue.poll();

        if(temp == null)
        {
            System.out.println("Level: "+level);
            if(!queue.isEmpty())
                queue.offer(null);
            level++;
        }else {

        System.out.println(temp.data);

        if(temp.getLeft()!=null)
            queue.offer(temp.getLeft());

        if(temp.getRight()!=null)
            queue.offer(temp.getRight());
        }

    }
}

static int preIndex = 0;

public static void main(String[] args) {

    if(args.length < 2)
    {
        System.out.println("Usage: preorder inorder");
        return;
    }

    char[] preOrderSequence = args[0].toCharArray();
    char[] inOrderSequence = args[1].toCharArray();

    //char[] preOrderSequence = {'A','B','D','E','C','F'};
    //char[] inOrderSequence = "DBEAFC".toCharArray();

    if(preOrderSequence.length != inOrderSequence.length)
    {
        System.out.println("Pre-order and in-order sequences must be of same length");
        return;
    }

    BinaryTreeNode root = buildBinaryTree(preOrderSequence, inOrderSequence, 0, preOrderSequence.length-1);

    System.out.println();
    levelTravesal(root);


}

static BinaryTreeNode buildBinaryTree(char[] preOrder, char[] inOrder, int start, int end)
{
    if(start > end)
        return null;
    BinaryTreeNode rootNode = new BinaryTreeNode();
    rootNode.setData(preOrder[preIndex]);
    preIndex++;
    //System.out.println(rootNode.getData());
    if(start == end)
        return rootNode;
    int dataIndex = search(inOrder, start, end, rootNode.getData());
    if(dataIndex == -1)
        return null;
    //System.out.println("Left Bounds: "+start+" "+(dataIndex-1));
    rootNode.setLeft(buildBinaryTree(preOrder, inOrder, start, dataIndex - 1));
    //System.out.println("Right Bounds: "+(dataIndex+1)+" "+end);
    rootNode.setRight(buildBinaryTree(preOrder, inOrder, dataIndex+1, end));
    return rootNode;
}


static int search(char[] inOrder,int start,int end,char data)
{
    for(int i=start;i<=end;i++)
    {
        if(inOrder[i] == data)
            return i;
    }
    return -1;

}

}
Dungeon Hunter
  • 19,827
  • 13
  • 59
  • 82
0

Here is a mathematical approach to achieve the thing in a very simplistic way :

Language used : Java

`
/* Algorithm for constructing binary tree from given Inorder and Preorder traversals. Following is the terminology used :

i : represents the inorder array supplied

p : represents the preorder array supplied

beg1 : starting index of inorder array

beg2 : starting index of preorder array

end1 : ending index of inorder array

end2 : ending index of preorder array

*/

public static void constructTree(Node root, int[] i, int[] p, int beg1, int end1, int beg2, int end2)

{

if(beg1==end1 && beg2 == end2)
{
    root.data = i[beg1];
}
else if(beg1<=end1 && beg2<=end2)
{
    root.data = p[beg2];
    int mid = search(i, (int) root.data);
    root.left=new Node();
    root.right=new Node();
    constructTree(root.left, i, p, beg1, mid-1, beg2+1, beg2+mid-beg1);
    System.out.println("Printing root left : " + root.left.data);
    constructTree(root.right, i, p, mid+1, end1, beg2+1+mid-beg1, end2);
    System.out.println("Printing root left : " + root.right.data);
}

}

`

You need invoke the function by following code :

int[] i ={4,8,7,9,2,5,1,6,19,3,18,10}; //Inorder
int[] p ={1,2,4,7,8,9,5,3,6,19,10,18}; //Preorder
Node root1=new Node();
constructTree(root1, i, p, 0, i.length-1, 0, p.length-1);

In case you need a more elaborate explanation of code please mention it in the comments. I would be happy to help :).

0

See my answer to this question. You build the tree by adding nodes in pre-order sequence, but by using the inorder position as comparator.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Andre Artus
  • 1,850
  • 15
  • 21
  • 1
    While this link may answer the question, it is better to include the essential parts of the answer here and provide the link for reference. Link-only answers can become invalid if the linked page changes. - [From Review](/review/low-quality-posts/11955978) – Ahmed Ashour Apr 09 '16 at 21:36
  • @AhmedAshour: I disagree...this isn't a link-only answer. Andre has given a [short] description of his solution, and then a link to a code example. Just because an answer is short, and has a link, doesn't automatically make it a link only answer. See: http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/287563/youre-doing-it-wrong-a-plea-for-sanity-in-the-low-quality-posts-queue – gariepy Apr 10 '16 at 03:59
  • @AhmedAshour, The link is to a page on SO. The problem with most "link-only" is potential dead links. If that link dies then this page likely dead too. – Andre Artus Apr 12 '16 at 03:36