438

With I would

var top5 = array.Take(5);

How to do this with Python?

martineau
  • 119,623
  • 25
  • 170
  • 301
Jader Dias
  • 88,211
  • 155
  • 421
  • 625
  • @ThorSummoner I guess OP assumed there's a unified way to do it in Python. – wjandrea Feb 13 '23 at 19:39
  • Just to note: I flipped the duplicate closure of this question w/r/t [Fetch first 10 results from a list in Python](/q/10897339/4518341) because this question is sort of asking two things, but that question is only asking one thing, so I hope it's easier to follow, especially for beginners. – wjandrea Feb 13 '23 at 19:55
  • Yeah, Checkout the [Python Data Model](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html) and more technically, [Python's `collections.abc`](https://docs.python.org/3/library/collections.abc.html) -- which unfortunately require a little interpretation, but we can see that `Generator`s have `close, __iter__, __next__` methods, and Lists (which are likely most similar to `MutableSequence`s) have one overlapping method: `__iter__`. therefore `iter([0, 1])` and `def fib():...` `iter(fib())` will provide a common interface to either a generator or list, in the form of a generator, see: `islice` – ThorSummoner Feb 20 '23 at 01:45

8 Answers8

709

Slicing a list

top5 = array[:5]
  • To slice a list, there's a simple syntax: array[start:stop:step]
  • You can omit any parameter. These are all valid: array[start:], array[:stop], array[::step]

Slicing a generator

import itertools
top5 = itertools.islice(my_list, 5) # grab the first five elements
  • You can't slice a generator directly in Python. itertools.islice() will wrap an object in a new slicing generator using the syntax itertools.islice(generator, start, stop, step)

  • Remember, slicing a generator will exhaust it partially. If you want to keep the entire generator intact, perhaps turn it into a tuple or list first, like: result = tuple(generator)

Nico Schlömer
  • 53,797
  • 27
  • 201
  • 249
lunixbochs
  • 21,757
  • 2
  • 39
  • 47
  • 76
    Also note that `itertools.islice` will return a generator. – Nick T Feb 01 '14 at 02:06
  • 4
    "If you want to keep the entire generator intact, perhaps turn it into a tuple or list first" -> won't that exhaust the generator fully, in the process of building up the tuple / list? – lucid_dreamer Oct 31 '18 at 23:44
  • 2
    @lucid_dreamer yes, but then you have a new data structure (tuple/list) that you can iterate over as much as you like – Davos Nov 29 '18 at 12:47
  • 3
    To create copies of the generator before exhausting it, you can also use [itertools.tee](https://docs.python.org/3/library/itertools.html#itertools.tee), e.g.: `generator, another_copy = itertools.tee(generator)` – Masood Khaari Jun 22 '20 at 19:12
  • Note: which slice gets which elements is determined by the order in which the slices are exhausted not in which they are created. `import itertools as it;r=(i for i in range(10));s1=itt.islice(r, 5);s2=itt.islice(r, 5);l2=list(s2);l1=list(s1)` ends with `l1==[5,6,7,8,9]` and `l2==[0,1,2,3,4]` – Eponymous Mar 06 '22 at 14:54
149
import itertools

top5 = itertools.islice(array, 5)
Jader Dias
  • 88,211
  • 155
  • 421
  • 625
  • 4
    This also has the nice property of returning the entire array when you have None in place of 5. – Kyle McDonald Jan 12 '16 at 07:03
  • 2
    and if you want to take the five that follows each time you can use: iter(array) instead of array. – yucer Jun 15 '16 at 13:57
  • 1
    note that if your generator exhausts this will not make an error, you will get a many elements as the generator had left, less than your request size. – ThorSummoner May 23 '17 at 17:23
  • 4
    This is the approach used in the following: [Itertools recipes](https://docs.python.org/3/library/itertools.html#itertools-recipes) `def take(n, iterable): return list(islice(iterable, n))` – Aaron Robson Apr 01 '18 at 18:43
60

@Shaikovsky's answer is excellent, but I wanted to clarify a couple of points.

[next(generator) for _ in range(n)]

This is the most simple approach, but throws StopIteration if the generator is prematurely exhausted.


On the other hand, the following approaches return up to n items which is preferable in many circumstances:

List: [x for _, x in zip(range(n), records)]

Generator: (x for _, x in zip(range(n), records))

Neuron
  • 5,141
  • 5
  • 38
  • 59
Bede Constantinides
  • 2,424
  • 3
  • 25
  • 28
  • 2
    Could those few people downvoting this answer please explain why? – Bede Constantinides Feb 05 '18 at 11:49
  • 1
    def take(num,iterable): return([elem for _ , elem in zip(range(num), iterable)]) – user-asterix May 13 '18 at 18:50
  • 1
    Above code: Loop over an iterable which could be a generator or list and return up to n elements from iterable. In case n is greater or equal to number of items existing in iterable then return all elements in iterable. – user-asterix May 13 '18 at 19:13
  • For a `list` `x=[1,2,3,4,5,6]`, `x[:20]` also return only the 6 elements in `x`. Guess `x[:N]` return first N elements of `x`, if `N > len(x)`, it will return `x`. python 3.6. – Jia Gao Feb 12 '20 at 14:58
  • 2
    This is the most efficient. Because this doesn't process the full list. – U13-Forward Sep 09 '21 at 10:19
  • 2
    `[next(generator, None) for _ in range(n)]` if you don't mind the `None` – maf88 Oct 19 '21 at 21:11
51

In my taste, it's also very concise to combine zip() with xrange(n) (or range(n) in Python3), which works nice on generators as well and seems to be more flexible for changes in general.

# Option #1: taking the first n elements as a list
[x for _, x in zip(xrange(n), generator)]

# Option #2, using 'next()' and taking care for 'StopIteration'
[next(generator) for _ in xrange(n)]

# Option #3: taking the first n elements as a new generator
(x for _, x in zip(xrange(n), generator))

# Option #4: yielding them by simply preparing a function
# (but take care for 'StopIteration')
def top_n(n, generator):
    for _ in xrange(n):
        yield next(generator)
Neuron
  • 5,141
  • 5
  • 38
  • 59
Shaikovsky
  • 526
  • 5
  • 7
21

The answer for how to do this can be found here

>>> generator = (i for i in xrange(10))
>>> list(next(generator) for _ in range(4))
[0, 1, 2, 3]
>>> list(next(generator) for _ in range(4))
[4, 5, 6, 7]
>>> list(next(generator) for _ in range(4))
[8, 9]

Notice that the last call asks for the next 4 when only 2 are remaining. The use of the list() instead of [] is what gets the comprehension to terminate on the StopIteration exception that is thrown by next().

Community
  • 1
  • 1
ebergerson
  • 369
  • 2
  • 6
11

Do you mean the first N items, or the N largest items?

If you want the first:

top5 = sequence[:5]

This also works for the largest N items, assuming that your sequence is sorted in descending order. (Your LINQ example seems to assume this as well.)

If you want the largest, and it isn't sorted, the most obvious solution is to sort it first:

l = list(sequence)
l.sort(reverse=True)
top5 = l[:5]

For a more performant solution, use a min-heap (thanks Thijs):

import heapq
top5 = heapq.nlargest(5, sequence)
Thomas
  • 174,939
  • 50
  • 355
  • 478
3

With itertools you will obtain another generator object so in most of the cases you will need another step the take the first n elements. There are at least two simpler solutions (a little bit less efficient in terms of performance but very handy) to get the elements ready to use from a generator:

Using list comprehension:

first_n_elements = [generator.next() for i in range(n)]

Otherwise:

first_n_elements = list(generator)[:n]

Where n is the number of elements you want to take (e.g. n=5 for the first five elements).

Neuron
  • 5,141
  • 5
  • 38
  • 59
G M
  • 20,759
  • 10
  • 81
  • 84
-6

This should work

top5 = array[:5] 
Bala R
  • 107,317
  • 23
  • 199
  • 210
  • 1
    @JoshWolff I didn't downvote this answer, but it's likely because this approach will not work with generators, unless they define `__getitem__()`. Try running `itertools.count()[:5]` or `(x for x in range(10))[:5]`, for instance, and see the error messages. The answer is, however, idiomatic for lists. – undercat Jan 22 '20 at 13:00