The existing answers helped me but miss a lot of explanation of what is going on.
find_package can work in MODULE mode or CONFIG mode.
In MODULE mode it searches for Find\<package\>.cmake
(typically owned by cmake).
In CONFIG mode it searches for \<package\>Config.cmake
(provided by the package).
Both cmake and protocol buffers can provide an implementation for protobuf_generate_cpp()
:
>grep -ri 'function(PROTOBUF_GENERATE_CPP' /opt/cmake-3.18.1/
/opt/cmake-3.18.1/share/cmake-3.18/Modules/FindProtobuf.cmake:function(PROTOBUF_GENERATE_CPP SRCS HDRS)
>grep -ri 'function(PROTOBUF_GENERATE_CPP' /opt/protobuf-3.5.0/
/opt/protobuf-3.5.0/lib64/cmake/protobuf/protobuf-module.cmake:function(PROTOBUF_GENERATE_CPP SRCS HDRS)
Using the PATHS hint puts cmake into CONFIG mode so that it will use the protobuf provided implementation if it can find a Config.cmake module.
In this case protobuf_generate_cpp() comes from config.cmake which requires:
set(protobuf_MODULE_COMPATIBLE ON CACHE BOOL "")
Because as @HaxtraZ mentions the config module contains:
if(protobuf_MODULE_COMPATIBLE)
include("${CMAKE_CURRENT_LIST_DIR}/protobuf-module.cmake")
endif()
This is not required if using the FindProtobuf MODULE and is thus not documented there.
Though it is not really its fault cmake could warn about the possible conflict.
If have raised this here:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/issues/21228
I have also reported the confusion caused by the missing documentation to the protocol buffers project here:
https://github.com/protocolbuffers/protobuf/issues/7912
Note: The default on some Linux installations (at least CentOS7 and Debian9) is typically to have protocol buffers produced using configure/make rather than cmake which does not install the cmake config files at all. So find_package(protobuf 3.5.0 REQUIRED) will work but find_package(protobuf 3.5.0 REQUIRED PATH I/only/wanted/to/help) will fail.