TL;DR: There's no easy way to do what you're asking unless you know the possible keys ahead of time.
Let me use an example to try to explain why and what your options are.
First, create the following DataFrame:
data = [({'a': 1, 'b': 2},), ({'c':3},), ({'a': 4, 'c': 5},)]
df = spark.createDataFrame(data, ["a"])
df.show()
#+-------------------+
#| a|
#+-------------------+
#|Map(a -> 1, b -> 2)|
#| Map(c -> 3)|
#|Map(a -> 4, c -> 5)|
#+-------------------+
which has the following schema:
df.printSchema()
#root
# |-- a: map (nullable = true)
# | |-- key: string
# | |-- value: long (valueContainsNull = true)
- can
MapType
be casted as StructType
?
The simple answer is no (at least not not efficiently), unless you know the keys ahead of time.
The difference between the MapType
and the StructType
is that the key-value pairs for the maps are row-wise independent. That is not the case for a StructType
column- in a struct column, all of the rows have the same struct fields.
For this reason, spark can't easily infer what columns to create from the map. (Remember that spark operates on each row in parallel). On the other hand, exploding a struct into columns is straightforward because all of the columns are known ahead of time.
So if you knew the keys, you can make a struct type via:
import pyspark.sql.functions as f
df_new = df.select(
f.struct(*[f.col("a").getItem(c).alias(c) for c in ["a", "b", "c"]]).alias("a")
)
df_new.show()
#+-------------+
#| a|
#+-------------+
#| [1,2,null]|
#|[null,null,3]|
#| [4,null,5]|
#+-------------+
And the new schema is:
df_new.printSchema()
#root
# |-- a: struct (nullable = false)
# | |-- a: long (nullable = true)
# | |-- b: long (nullable = true)
# | |-- c: long (nullable = true)
- can we query sub-keys directly from MapType?
Yes, (as shown above) you can use the getItem()
which will get an item at an index out of a list, or by key out of a map.
If you don't know the keys, your only option is to explode
the map into rows, groupby
and pivot
.
df.withColumn("id", f.monotonically_increasing_id())\
.select("id", f.explode("a"))\
.groupby("id")\
.pivot("key")\
.agg(f.first("value"))\
.drop("id")\
.show()
#+----+----+----+
#| a| b| c|
#+----+----+----+
#|null|null| 3|
#| 1| 2|null|
#| 4|null| 5|
#+----+----+----+
In this case, we need to create an id
column first so that there's something to group by.
The pivot
here can be expensive, depending on the size of your data.