6

I'm trying to check out one of my local branches, named TEAM20-lab2-release. When I try to do this, I get an ambiguous refname error:

$ git branch TEAM20-lab2-release
warning: refname 'TEAM20-lab1-release' is ambiguous.
fatal: Ambiguous object name: 'TEAM20-lab1-release'.

Here is the list of my branches:

$ git branch -a
  TEAM20-lab1
* TEAM20-lab1-release
  master
  remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master
  remotes/origin/master
Joshua Taylor
  • 84,998
  • 9
  • 154
  • 353
Justin
  • 441
  • 6
  • 9

3 Answers3

8

It usually is because you have the same name (than your branch) used in another namespace:

  • like the "remotes" namespace: the name of a remote repo as illustrated by this SO question.
    (Hence davitenio's request for git branch -a in the comments)
  • or the "tags" namespace": having a tag named after a branch can also trigger that message (see this blog post)

Update 2016: Git 2.12 (Q1 2017) won't show any error if a branch and a tag are sharing the same name.

See commit b284495 (31 Oct 2016) by Dennis Kaarsemaker (seveas).
See commit eef2bda (28 Oct 2016) by Junio C Hamano (gitster).
(Merged by Junio C Hamano -- gitster -- in commit 6c18dd4, 27 Dec 2016)

push: do not use potentially ambiguous default refspec

When the user does the lazy "git push" with no parameters with push.default set to either "upstream", "simple" or "current", we internally generated a refspec that has the current branch name on the source side and used it to push.

However, the branch name (say "test") may be an ambiguous refname in the context of the source repository --- there may be a tag with the same name, for example.
This would trigger an unnecessary error without any fault on the end-user's side.

Be explicit and give a full refname as the source side to avoid the ambiguity.
The destination side when pushing with the "current" sent only the name of the branch and forcing the receiving end to guess, which is the same issue.
Be explicit there as well.

Community
  • 1
  • 1
VonC
  • 1,262,500
  • 529
  • 4,410
  • 5,250
4

to get you started locating ambiguous refs

function branchid() 
{ 
    echo $(basename "$(dirname "$1")")/$(basename "$1"); 
}

for ref in $(git for-each-ref | cut -f2)
    do echo -e "$ref\t$(branchid "$ref")"
done | 
    sort --key 2 | uniq -Df 2
sehe
  • 374,641
  • 47
  • 450
  • 633
1

I got the same error message when trying to set the upstream branch for a local branch.

cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git status
On branch master

nothing to commit, working directory clean
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git branch --set-upstream-to gerrit/master master
warning: refname 'gerrit/master' is ambiguous.
fatal: Ambiguous object name: 'gerrit/master'.
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git remote -vv
gerrit  ssh://cgd@gerrit.server:29418/reporter (fetch)
gerrit  ssh://cgd@gerrit.server:29418/reporter (push)
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git branch -a
  gerrit/master
* master
  remotes/gerrit/master
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git branch -d gerrit/master
Deleted branch gerrit/master (was 1234567).
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git branch --set-upstream-to gerrit/master master
Branch master set up to track remote branch master from gerrit.

cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git fetch
cgd@flavia-cgd-mobi:~/Projects/reporter$ git status
On branch master
Your branch is up-to-date with 'gerrit/master'.

nothing to commit, working directory clean

As you can see I somehow created a local branch called gerrit/master which caused the conflict since git could not decide whether to track the local branch or the remote one. Deleting the erroneous branch fixed the thing and made me happy again.

Christoph Grimmer
  • 4,210
  • 4
  • 40
  • 64