Even if you managed to fix the superficial syntax problems, a subprocess which runs successfully simply then terminates without a trace; it doesn't attempt to (and couldn't, even if it wanted to) modify the environment of the parent Python process. This is a common FAQ.
You could run the eval
in the parent process which starts your Python script, or perhaps figure out how to communicate with ssh-agent
directly from Python. Its output is usually a simple sequence of variable assignments, which you can parse yourself.
from subprocess import check_output
from os import environ
eval_string = check_output(['ssh-agent'])
for line in eval_string.rstrip('\n').split('\n'):
for expr in line.rstrip(';').split(';'):
if expr.startswith((' export ', 'echo ')):
continue
var, value = expr.strip().split('=', 1)
environ[var] = value
If the output from ssh-agent
contains shell quoting, you will need to perform additional parsing on it (basically, trim the quotes around the value string). But this is already rather clunky and brittle, so perhaps revert to setting up the environment before launching Python instead of trying to splash some sophistication onto this kludge.
In more detail, ssh-agent
and a precious few other shell utilities have a very specific design in order for them to be able to communicate with their parent process. Precisely because a subprocess cannot make any changes in the environment of its parent process, it instead prints a piece of code for its parent process to execute. By default, it prints sh
code like this:
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/ssh-MUyniqn10506/agent.10506; export SSH_AUTH_SOCK;
SSH_AGENT_PID=10507; export SSH_AGENT_PID;
echo Agent pid 10507;
There is also an option for it to print similar code in csh
syntax (this is a historical shell which thankfully isn't used much any longer) but, alas, no option for producing Python code. (It would not be hard to make ssh-agent
do that, per se.)
(The above output sample copy/pasted from http://blog.joncairns.com/2013/12/understanding-ssh-agent-and-ssh-add/ which contains a fuller explanation.)