I have a working solution but it seems silly that it's needed.
This is my working solution:
@PreAuthorize("isAuthenticated()")
@ApiOperation(value = "Takes in a document.", nickname = "Document Upload", response = DocumentResponse[].class)
@ResponseStatus(HttpStatus.ACCEPTED)
@RequestMapping(
value = "/api/v1/document/upload",
produces = "application/json",
consumes = "multipart/form-data",
method = RequestMethod.POST)
public DocumentResponse uploadDocument(
// THIS is where I am using a String and don't want to.
@RequestPart("fileData") String fileData,
@RequestPart("file") MultipartFile file,
@RequestHeader("idempotency-id") String idempotencyId) throws IOException {
// THIS is the line I would also like to avoid.
DocumentUploadFileData fileDataObj = objectMapper.readValue(fileData, DocumentUploadFileData.class);
printBeanValues(fileDataObj);
More after....
The trouble is that fileData
is a String
object. I would like to have spring map the JSON directly to my DocumentUploadFileData
class without having to do it myself as seen here: DocumentUploadFileData fileDataObj = objectMapper.readValue(fileData, DocumentUploadFileData.class);
What I have tried:
- Instead of
@RequestPart
I just used nothing. I actually thought that would be fine. It wasn't. - List item
@RequestBody
. I thought for sure this would work. Instead, it just started yelling at me about my content/type not being valid? The content type didn't change but for some reason it wanted it to be application/json (even though I'm saying multipart/form-data explicitly. I guess@ReqestBody
is intended for application/json requests and it doesn't like playing with multipart? - I also tried using RequestParam, that actually works if I use a String as the object. If I try to use my
DocumentUploadFileData
instead it fails and tells me it doesn't have a mapping strategy for the object? I think something about the fact that it's a multipart request makes spring decide to use different mappers that maybe I need to add? I know multipart requests use boundaries and are just a little different generally so it makes sense that it might want a different solution. I just don't know how to provide that.
I haven't used Spring for 3 years I'm sure the solution isn't that complicated, however, I still haven't gotten it after several hours.