I've already seen: Swift UITableView reloadData in a closure but it still does not work. That's why I'm creating a new thread for this.
I'm trying to insert Firestore data into a custom tableview. But when I print the numbers it returns (In the console):
"MyDogwalk.listTxt"
And no data is showing up on the tableview.
I guess all of this is relevant. (I also have 2 classes, with init etc)
class HistoryViewController: UIViewController {
//Tableview
@IBOutlet weak var tableView: UITableView!
let db = Firestore.firestore()
var list: [listTxt] = []
override func viewDidLoad()
{
super.viewDidLoad()
list = createArray()
tableView.delegate = self
tableView.dataSource = self
}
func createArray() -> [listTxt]
{
var tempTxt: [listTxt] = []
//Authentication
let authentication = Auth.auth().currentUser?.uid
//Choosing collection
db.collection("rastad").document(authentication!).collection("promenad").getDocuments()
{ (QuerySnapshot, err) in
if err != nil
{
print("Error getting documents: \(String(describing: err))");
}
else
{
//For-loop
for _ in QuerySnapshot!.documents
{
self.list.removeAll()
let document = QuerySnapshot!.documents.first
let data = document!.data()
data.forEach { (item) in
let data1 = data["Dog"] as? String
let data2 = data["Person"] as? String
let data3 = data["What"] as? String
let data4 = data["Date"] as? String
let data5 = data["Time"] as? String
let txt = listTxt(dog: data1!, person: data2!, action: data3!, time: data4!, date: data5!)
print(txt)
tempTxt.append(txt)
}
}
self.tableView.reloadData()
}
}
//return tempTxt
return list
}
}
extension HistoryViewController: UITableViewDelegate, UITableViewDataSource
{
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, numberOfRowsInSection section: Int) -> Int {
return list.count
}
func tableView(_ tableView: UITableView, cellForRowAt indexPath: IndexPath) -> UITableViewCell
{
let listPath = list[indexPath.row]
let cell = tableView.dequeueReusableCell(withIdentifier: "ListCell") as! HistoryCell
cell.setCell(list: listPath)
return cell
}
}
And.. Why is this downvoted? I got an answer that was actually working for this case, and the question is detailed enough for people to understand, isn't it?