I'm in dll hell.
I'm building a plugin for a huge, ancient and very powerful software suite called ANSYS. They have a plugin framework. I had hoped that they would magically handle everything for me via AssemblyContext
s or AppDomain
s or some other clever dotnet device that I don't understand. They do not.
The result is that I've created an application that depends on GRPC.core 1.16.0 via nuget. I wrote a little application that drives my plugin with a winform host. It loads and works perfectly, finding my library in ~/myproject/bin/debug/grpc.core.1.1.16.dll
that exists right beside the class-library that is my plugin, no problem.
When I run my plugin in the ANSYS process space, which happens to also depend on grpc 1.0.0.0, the linker finds C:\Program FIles\ANSYS\...\WIN64\grpc.core.dll
. No Good.
One odd thing about the Nuget GRPC package is that it adds a reference with a "reference version" of 1.0.0.0, where most other nuget packages have their reference version match the nuget package version. If i manually change the reference version the compiler wont find the library.
<Reference Include="Grpc.Core, Version=1.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=d754f35622e28bad">
<HintPath>..\packages\Grpc.Core.1.16.1\lib\net45\Grpc.Core.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
edit: the key is in the above line. The Nuget published Grpc.core artifact is at
AssemblyInformationVersion=1.16.1.0, AssemblyFileVersion=1.16.1.0, AssemblyVersion=1.0.0.0
. I logged this as a request against GRPC. More Below.
Thus I need to tell the runtime linking facilities not to use grpc.core...dll found in ANSYS's own binary directoryWhats more, there is exactly one dll (and its dependents) that I wish to load from my parent processes context: and that's ANSYS API dlls themselves, which are probably already in the GAC. In my project I've included this as a non-nuget reference with "build action: do not copy" selected.
So my questions:
is there something simple and easy I can do at runtime to tell the runtime-linker "when somebody loads a type from an assembly you think should begrpc.core
, do not load 1.0.0.0, find 1.16.0.0 exactly"?the runtime was already matching the needed library by "strong name". The problem is that the 1.16.0 is a misnomer. That version string was informational, but the assembly itself was version 1.0.0.0. Fusion was loading the library I wanted by exact match already.
- is there something smarter I can do with appdomains or contexts or another C# device to explictly enter some kind of nested scope? Could I go so far as to log this as a bug in ANSYS's API?
I've tried digging into this myself, but I'm not a dotnet expert and finding out whether I'm looking at a nuget package configuration option --which isn't relevant to me, or an old-fashioned dotnet runtime option, has been very tricky.
update 1:
I've tried using AppDomain.CreateDomain
, and it does indeed solve my problem, but it also requires me to provide a marshalling strategy for the already-loaded API objects. In other words, if you're programming against a plugin framework that has an api similar to:
public void DoMyPluginsFunctionality(ApiProvidedInputContext context){
var myPlugin = AppDomain.Create(
strongName: "MyCompany.MyPlugin.; Version=1.2.3.4 ...",
baseDirectory: "C:\\Program Files\\MyPlugin\\bin"
)
//success! MyCompany.MyPlugin loads the version of GRPC I want!
myPlugin.unWrapAsDynamicProxy().doFunctionality(context)
//error: No marshalling strategy and/or not serializable and/or swizzling errors
}
Then the runtime will require you to marshall (serialize) the context
variable, because .net will not let you share memory across AppDomain boundaries.
So my new question:
- given I cant use AppDomains myself
- given that Grpc.core is always published as AssemblyVersion=1.0.0.0
What are my options?
- Stop using newer features of GRPC.core and live in fear of my parent processes dependencies
- use a strategy similar to shading. Is there something like shading in the .net world?
- Edit the published binary's version metadata. Can I dynamically edit a published binaries version?
- rebuild GRPC myself with the version string updated --effectively a private fork of GRPC.
update 2:
The GRPC build system seems like its quite large and well maintained, so I'm hoping I can simply build it and change a vcproj file to include an updated version string.
Unfortunately it also seems quite complex, and I haven't quite got the targeting/cross-compiling (x64 targeting x86) worked out.