I tested a couple of variants (for bigint
only) with built-in functionality and this variant with OVERLAY()
turned out fastest in my local tests on Postgres 11:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint2(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT OVERLAY(bit(64) '0' PLACING b FROM 65 - bit_length(b))::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
Other candidates:
Note the different conversion of empty bitstrings (''
) to 0
vs. NULL
. Adapt to your needs!
Your function:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint1(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT CASE bit_length($1)
WHEN 1 THEN $1::bit(1)::bigint
WHEN 2 THEN $1::bit(2)::bigint
WHEN 3 THEN $1::bit(3)::bigint
WHEN 4 THEN $1::bit(4)::bigint
WHEN 5 THEN $1::bit(5)::bigint
WHEN 6 THEN $1::bit(6)::bigint
WHEN 7 THEN $1::bit(7)::bigint
WHEN 8 THEN $1::bit(8)::bigint
WHEN 9 THEN $1::bit(9)::bigint
WHEN 10 THEN $1::bit(10)::bigint
WHEN 11 THEN $1::bit(11)::bigint
WHEN 12 THEN $1::bit(12)::bigint
WHEN 13 THEN $1::bit(13)::bigint
WHEN 14 THEN $1::bit(14)::bigint
WHEN 15 THEN $1::bit(15)::bigint
WHEN 16 THEN $1::bit(16)::bigint
WHEN 17 THEN $1::bit(17)::bigint
WHEN 18 THEN $1::bit(18)::bigint
WHEN 19 THEN $1::bit(19)::bigint
WHEN 20 THEN $1::bit(20)::bigint
WHEN 21 THEN $1::bit(21)::bigint
WHEN 22 THEN $1::bit(22)::bigint
WHEN 23 THEN $1::bit(23)::bigint
WHEN 24 THEN $1::bit(24)::bigint
WHEN 25 THEN $1::bit(25)::bigint
WHEN 26 THEN $1::bit(26)::bigint
WHEN 27 THEN $1::bit(27)::bigint
WHEN 28 THEN $1::bit(28)::bigint
WHEN 29 THEN $1::bit(29)::bigint
WHEN 30 THEN $1::bit(30)::bigint
WHEN 31 THEN $1::bit(31)::bigint
WHEN 32 THEN $1::bit(32)::bigint
WHEN 33 THEN $1::bit(33)::bigint
WHEN 34 THEN $1::bit(34)::bigint
WHEN 35 THEN $1::bit(35)::bigint
WHEN 36 THEN $1::bit(36)::bigint
WHEN 37 THEN $1::bit(37)::bigint
WHEN 38 THEN $1::bit(38)::bigint
WHEN 39 THEN $1::bit(39)::bigint
WHEN 40 THEN $1::bit(40)::bigint
WHEN 41 THEN $1::bit(41)::bigint
WHEN 42 THEN $1::bit(42)::bigint
WHEN 43 THEN $1::bit(43)::bigint
WHEN 44 THEN $1::bit(44)::bigint
WHEN 45 THEN $1::bit(45)::bigint
WHEN 46 THEN $1::bit(46)::bigint
WHEN 47 THEN $1::bit(47)::bigint
WHEN 48 THEN $1::bit(48)::bigint
WHEN 49 THEN $1::bit(49)::bigint
WHEN 50 THEN $1::bit(50)::bigint
WHEN 51 THEN $1::bit(51)::bigint
WHEN 52 THEN $1::bit(52)::bigint
WHEN 53 THEN $1::bit(53)::bigint
WHEN 54 THEN $1::bit(54)::bigint
WHEN 55 THEN $1::bit(55)::bigint
WHEN 56 THEN $1::bit(56)::bigint
WHEN 57 THEN $1::bit(57)::bigint
WHEN 58 THEN $1::bit(58)::bigint
WHEN 59 THEN $1::bit(59)::bigint
WHEN 60 THEN $1::bit(60)::bigint
WHEN 61 THEN $1::bit(61)::bigint
WHEN 62 THEN $1::bit(62)::bigint
WHEN 63 THEN $1::bit(63)::bigint
WHEN 64 THEN $1::bit(64)::bigint
ELSE NULL::bigint
END
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE; -- no STRICT modifier
Left-padding the text representation with '0':
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION pg_temp.varbit2bigint3(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT lpad(b::text, 64, '0')::bit(64)::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
Bit-shifting before the cast:
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION varbit2bigint4(b varbit)
RETURNS bigint AS
$func$
SELECT (bit(64) '0' || b << bit_length(b))::bit(64)::bigint
$func$ LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE;
db<>fiddle here
Related:
Your feedback
It is not worst, it is faster!
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select
varbit_to_bigint(osm_id::bit(64)::varbit)
from planet_osm_point limit 10000 ;
-- Planning time: 0.697 ms
-- Execution time: 1133.571 ms
EXPLAIN ANALYZE select
lpad(osm_id::bit(64)::varbit::text, 32, '0')::bit(64)::bigint
from planet_osm_point limit 10000;
-- Planning time: 0.105 ms
-- Execution time: 26.429 ms
You show a STRICT
modifier with the bigint
variant of the function in the question (not sure why it differs from the integer
variant). If that represents the function you actually tested, I expect most of the observed performance difference is due to that added STRICT
modifier preventing function inlining. Quoting the Postgres Wiki:
if the function is declared STRICT
, then the planner must be able to
prove that the body expression necessarily returns NULL
if any
parameter is null. At present, this condition is only satisfied if:
every parameter is referenced at least once, and all functions,
operators and other constructs used in the body are themselves STRICT
.
That seems to hurt your function badly - while my winner seems unaffected, and the other two variants are even ~ 10 % faster. Same fiddle with STRICT
functions:
db<>fiddle here
Related:
I suggest you re-test with and without STRICT
modifier to see for yourself.