Approach #1
We can leverage np.lib.stride_tricks.as_strided
based scikit-image's view_as_windows
to get sliding windows. More info on use of as_strided
based view_as_windows
.
Additionally, it accepts a step
argument and that would fit in perfectly for this problem. Hence, the implementation would be -
from skimage.util.shape import view_as_windows
def ranged_mat(n):
r = np.arange(1,n*(n-1)+2)
return view_as_windows(r,n,step=n-1)
Sample runs -
In [270]: ranged_mat(2)
Out[270]:
array([[1, 2],
[2, 3]])
In [271]: ranged_mat(3)
Out[271]:
array([[1, 2, 3],
[3, 4, 5],
[5, 6, 7]])
In [272]: ranged_mat(4)
Out[272]:
array([[ 1, 2, 3, 4],
[ 4, 5, 6, 7],
[ 7, 8, 9, 10],
[10, 11, 12, 13]])
Approach #2
Another with outer-broadcasted-addition
-
def ranged_mat_v2(n):
r = np.arange(n)
return (n-1)*r[:,None]+r+1
Approach #3
We can also use numexpr
module that supports multi-core processing and hence achieve better efficiency on large n's
-
import numexpr as ne
def ranged_mat_v3(n):
r = np.arange(n)
r2d = (n-1)*r[:,None]
return ne.evaluate('r2d+r+1')
Making use of slicing gives us a more memory-efficient one -
def ranged_mat_v4(n):
r = np.arange(n+1)
r0 = r[1:]
r1 = r[:-1,None]*(n-1)
return ne.evaluate('r0+r1')
Timings -
In [423]: %timeit ranged_mat(10000)
273 ms ± 3.42 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
In [424]: %timeit ranged_mat_v2(10000)
316 ms ± 2.03 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1 loop each)
In [425]: %timeit ranged_mat_v3(10000)
176 ms ± 85.9 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
In [426]: %timeit ranged_mat_v4(10000)
154 ms ± 82.8 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)