Bags are stored in arrays. I do understand that we can change the size of bags as we want etc.. However, since it is stored in array, it basically has an index number isn't it? In this case, why do we still say that it is unordered?
1 Answers
Bags are stored in arrays
No they are not.
Actually, they might be, depending on implementation, but they surely don't have to be. It's like saying a List
is stored in an array. That is e.g. true for an ArrayList
, but not true for a LinkedList
.
So what's the difference between a bag, a list, and a set?
A list is ordered, allowing duplicates
- Generally has slow lookup by value.
ArrayList
implementation uses array, with fast lookup by position.LinkedList
implementation uses doubly-linked nodes, with fast insert/remove at beginning of list.
A set is unordered, no duplicates
- Generally allows fast lookup by value.
HashSet
implementation is unordered.LinkedHashSet
implementation is ordered.TreeSet
implementation is sorted.
A bag is unordered, allowing duplicates
- No built-in Java support. Generally just use
List
if needed.
Recommend using third-party library if fast lookup by value is needed.
- No built-in Java support. Generally just use
It's the definition of the terms that specifies the ordered vs unordered semantics. An implementation of a bag might happen to keep ordering, but it's not required by the generic term bag.
Let's clear up the confusion about bags in Java.
The Java Runtime Library doesn't have any
Bag
type.The Apache Commons Collections™ library has a
Bag
interface that implementsjava.util.Collection
, although it violates theCollection
contract. It has aHashBag
and aTreeBag
implementation, but no implementation using an array.The Google Guava library has a bag interface named
Multiset
that also implementsjava.util.Collection
. It hasHashMultiset
,LinkedHashMultiset
, andTreeMultiset
implementations, but no implementation using an array.Hibernate ORM has a
Bag
class.
None of them specifies that a bag is a list, and none of them uses array to implement the bag.

- 154,647
- 11
- 152
- 247
-
The first point is key to the difference as Arrays and Bags are children of java.util.List, which I believe Yuan is asking for clarification. It really is just how you implement. Normally bags are found with Hibernate for queries and it is necessary to use implement a strategy. [this has a good explanation from Java.org](https://thoughts-on-java.org/association-mappings-bag-list-set/) – Kevin Aug 29 '19 at 18:18
-
3@Kevin *"Bags are children of java.util.List"* No they are not. The Java Runtime Library doesn't have any `Bag` type. – Andreas Aug 29 '19 at 19:02
-
Whoops! you are right, I'm thinking in the context of PersistentBag which implements List. Thanks for the catch! – Kevin Aug 30 '19 at 18:18