(I know it is not a conventional implementation, but I wanted to try the idea.)
struct TrieNode {
std::unordered_map<char, TrieNode> next;
};
This class is very well compiled and worked as expected under visual studio 2017. However, it does not compile with gcc (c++14) (as I'd expect).
In file included from /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_algobase.h:64, from /usr/include/c++/8/bits/char_traits.h:39, from /usr/include/c++/8/ios:40, from /usr/include/c++/8/ostream:38, from /usr/include/c++/8/iostream:39, from prog.cpp:1: /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_pair.h: In instantiation of ‘struct std::pair<const char, TrieNode>’: /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_vector.h:1610:27: required from ‘struct __gnu_cxx::__aligned_buffer<std::pair<const char, TrieNode> >’ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/hashtable_policy.h:234:43: required from ‘struct std::__detail::_Hash_node_value_base<std::pair<const char, TrieNode> >’ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/hashtable_policy.h:280:12: required from ‘struct std::__detail::_Hash_node<std::pair<const char, TrieNode>, false>’ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/hashtable_policy.h:2027:49: required from ‘struct std::__detail::_Hashtable_alloc<std::allocator<std::__detail::_Hash_node<std::pair<const char, TrieNode>, false> > >’ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/hashtable.h:173:11: required from ‘class std::_Hashtable<char, std::pair<const char, TrieNode>, std::allocator<std::pair<const char, TrieNode> >, std::__detail::_Select1st, std::equal_to<char>, std::hash<char>, std::__detail::_Mod_range_hashing, std::__detail::_Default_ranged_hash, std::__detail::_Prime_rehash_policy, std::__detail::_Hashtable_traits<false, false, true> >’ /usr/include/c++/8/bits/unordered_map.h:105:18: required from ‘class std::unordered_map<char, TrieNode>’ prog.cpp:9:37: required from here /usr/include/c++/8/bits/stl_pair.h:215:11: error: ‘std::pair<_T1, _T2>::second’ has incomplete type _T2 second; /// @c second is a copy of the second object ^~~~~~ prog.cpp:7:8: note: forward declaration of ‘struct TrieNode’ struct TrieNode { ^~~~~~~~
I wonder how visual c++ implementation did not have any problem with that? What do standards say for such cases ?