I'm using Laravel 6 with a SQL Server 2017 database backend. In the database I have a table called PersonPhoto, with a Photo column and a Thumbnail column where the photos and thumbnails are stored as VARBINARY.
I have defined the following Eloquent model, with two Accessors to convert the images to base64 encoding:
<?php
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class PersonPhoto extends Model
{
protected $connection = 'mydb';
protected $table = 'PersonPhoto';
protected $primaryKey ='PersonID';
public function person(){
return $this->belongsTo('App\Person', 'PersonID');
}
public function getPhotoAttribute($value){
return base64_encode($value);
}
public function getThumbnailAttribute($value){
return base64_encode($value);
}
}
This works fine in Blade templates, however when I try to serialize to JSON or an Array I get a "Malformed UTF-8 characters, possibly incorrectly encoded" error, as if the Accessors are being ignored and the raw data is being serialized. To workaround this, I have altered the model:
<?php
namespace App;
use Illuminate\Database\Eloquent\Model;
class PersonPhoto extends Model
{
protected $connection = 'mydb';
protected $table = 'PersonPhoto';
protected $primaryKey ='PersonID';
//Added to hide from and add fields to serializer
protected $hidden = ['Photo', 'Thumbnail'];
protected $appends = ['encoded_photo', 'encoded_thumbnail'];
public function person(){
return $this->belongsTo('App\Person', 'PersonID');
}
public function getPhotoAttribute($value){
return base64_encode($value);
}
public function getThumbnailAttribute($value){
return base64_encode($value);
}
//Added these new accessors
public function getEncodedPhotoAttribute(){
return base64_encode($this->Photo);
}
public function getEncodedThumbnailAttribute(){
return base64_encode($this->Thumbnail);
}
}
This hides the original Photo and Thumbnail fields from the serializer and includes the two new accessors. This appears to work and solves my issue.
Questions: 1) Is Laravel's serializer ignoring my Accessors as I suspect, and is this by design? 2) Although my workaround works, is this a reasonable approach or am I likely to run into problems? Is there a better way of doing it?
Thanks