3

I'm running a merge with a scenario where several "common ancestors" are available so Git runs "git merge recursive" strategy.

As such, it runs a merge to create a new ancestor that will, in turn, be used as CA for the contributors I'm working on.

Ok, the problem is the following, there's a file with a conflict which "ancestor" comes from the "recursive merge" performed internally by Git, so, when I try to fix the conflict with git mergetool using KDiff3, I see the following:enter image description here

Is this normal? My example is a little bit "too simple" (only one line in the file, so not real), but... will having this common ancestor help?

Thanks!!

pablo
  • 6,392
  • 4
  • 42
  • 62

1 Answers1

-2

You should have no problem in fixing the merge conflicts. This merge strategy was defined as the default one for a reason. Try it (you might want to add a tag to be able to go back if it goes wrong).

vonbrand
  • 11,412
  • 8
  • 32
  • 52