I'm thinking about a future architecture in micro services and I'm heading to Kong as API Gateway and Keycloak SSO/IAM.
I wonder how to justify/understand Keycloak's positioning in architecture: behind or next to Kong.
I read the following post:
Is keycloak behind api gateway a good practice?
As well as the associated blog that presents Keycloak next to Kong But I have also identified architectures that offer the authentication manager behind the API Gateway as shown here:
https://blog.octo.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/pattern_api_microservices-2.png
Could you help me to better understand the pros and cons so that I can identify which architecture to put in place, please?
