Platform CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810, working in bash. GNU bash, version 4.2.46(2)-release (x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu)
This is an idiom I've seen recommended for parsing text in bash in general and in particular for returning multiple values from a function.
IFS=":" read A B <<< $(echo ONE:TWO)
I'm getting unexpected behaviour when I call a function, yyy in the example here
IFS=":" read Y1 Y2 <<< $(yyy)
where yyy itself also wants to do a similar call.
The effect is that that within yyy() even though I explicitly specify the IFS
IFS=":" read C1 C2 <<< $( echo "A:B" )
The fields are parsed, but both values are assigned to C1, it gets the value "A B". If the function is called in isolation it works as expected.
This is a test case, distilled down from a much larger script. I want to know what is happening with IFS here. In the failure case (the second example below) setting IFS=":" in the caller somehow cause the result fields to be aggregated. The first and third calls to yyy() below work as expected, output shown after the code.
#!/bin/bash
debug() { echo "$1" 1>&2 ; }
yyy() {
debug "in yyy"
# why are the two values assigned to A here if the caller specified IFS?
IFS=":" read A B <<< $(echo ONE:TWO)
debug "A=$A"
debug "B=$B"
echo "$A:$B"
}
# this works as expected
read Y1 Y2 <<< $(yyy)
echo -e "===\n"
# this cause the read in yyy() to aggregate
IFS=":" read Y1 Y2 <<< $(yyy)
echo -e "===\n"
# This is a workaround that enables yyy() to work correctly
# But why do I need to do this?
OUT="$(yyy)"
IFS=":" read Y1 Y2 <<< $(echo $OUT)
This is the output
in yyy
A=ONE B=TWO
===
in yyy
A=ONE TWO B=
===
in yyy
A=ONE B=TWO
Note that in the second case A
gets the value ONE TWO