I want to know if there is a memory advantage when using this kind of method, decorated with @staticmethod
and @classmethod
. It could be useful when instantiating several objects of a class.
Asked
Active
Viewed 25 times
0

jonrsharpe
- 115,751
- 26
- 228
- 437

JLD
- 89
- 5
-
3No method is defined more than once anyway, even without any decorator. **Write what you mean.** Only worry about memory optimisation if you have an indication that it's a problem. – deceze Mar 04 '20 at 08:29
-
I really don't know if method definitions has anything to do with memory foot-print! – Kris Mar 04 '20 at 08:31
-
instances of classes in Python do not carry around copies of the methods that exist in the class. Those function objects belong to the *class*. So, `vars(some_instance)` will show you instance attributes, but you'll see, the methods aren't there. – juanpa.arrivillaga Mar 04 '20 at 08:32
-
The duplicate title isn't a great match, but the answers there should be enlightening to you nonetheless. – deceze Mar 04 '20 at 08:43
-
Thanks all for the feedback and help. I already knew the purpose of static methods and class methods, I only wanted to know the memory treatment at a low level, but with your answers it is clear. – JLD Mar 04 '20 at 15:52