We know that libc++ and libstdc++'s std::tuple implementations are very different - forwards vs backwards order of element storage:
Why does libstdc++ store std::tuple elements in reverse order?
However, EASTL's tuple class says, in a comment, that its implementation is based on libc++'s. It doesn't say, however, if there are any non-trivial changes or whether it's a straightforward import into EASTL (depending on EASTL's versions of <type_traits>, <functional> etc.).
So, which is it? And - if there is a significant difference, why was it introduced?
