TL;DR
no install
python -c 'import json, sys;json.dump(json.load(sys.stdin), sys.stdout)' < my.json
very fast (with jj)
jj -u < my.json
Perf benchmark
Here's the script, using hyperfine
:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
tmp=$(mktemp json.XXX)
tmp_md=$(mktemp md.XXX)
trap "rm $tmp $tmp_md" EXIT
cat <<JSON > $tmp
{
"foo": "lorem",
"bar": "ipsum"
}
JSON
hyperfine \
--export-markdown $tmp_md \
--warmup 100 \
"jj -u < $tmp" \
"yq eval -j -I=0 < $tmp" \
"xidel -s - -e '\$json' --printed-json-format=compact < $tmp" \
"jq --compact-output < $tmp" \
"python3 -c 'import json, sys;json.dump(json.load(sys.stdin), sys.stdout)' < $tmp" \
"ruby -r json -e 'j JSON.parse \$stdin.read' < $tmp"
pbcopy < $tmp_md
The result on my mac — MacBook Air (M1, 2020), 8 GB:
Command |
Mean [ms] |
Min [ms] |
Max [ms] |
Relative |
jj -u < json.p72 |
1.3 ± 0.2 |
0.9 |
2.7 |
1.00 |
yq eval -j -I=0 < json.p72 |
4.4 ± 0.4 |
3.8 |
7.8 |
3.37 ± 0.65 |
xidel -s - -e '$json' --printed-json-format=compact < json.p72 |
5.5 ± 0.3 |
5.0 |
6.5 |
4.19 ± 0.77 |
python3 -c 'import json, sys;json.dump(json.load(sys.stdin), sys.stdout)' < json.p72 |
14.0 ± 0.4 |
13.4 |
15.0 |
10.71 ± 1.89 |
jq --compact-output < json.p72 |
14.4 ± 2.0 |
13.2 |
33.6 |
11.02 ± 2.45 |
ruby -r json -e 'j JSON.parse $stdin.read' < json.p72 |
47.3 ± 0.6 |
46.1 |
48.5 |
36.10 ± 6.32 |
Result for a large JSON file (14k lines):
http https://france-geojson.gregoiredavid.fr/repo/regions.geojson | jj -p > $tmp
Command |
Mean [ms] |
Min [ms] |
Max [ms] |
Relative |
jj -u < json.wFY |
3.4 ± 0.7 |
2.7 |
12.2 |
1.00 |
jq --compact-output < json.wFY |
35.1 ± 0.4 |
34.5 |
36.1 |
10.24 ± 2.23 |
python3 -c 'import json, sys;json.dump(json.load(sys.stdin), sys.stdout)' < json.wFY |
47.4 ± 0.5 |
46.3 |
48.7 |
13.82 ± 3.01 |
xidel -s - -e '$json' --printed-json-format=compact < json.wFY |
55.5 ± 1.2 |
54.7 |
63.5 |
16.17 ± 3.53 |
ruby -r json -e 'j JSON.parse $stdin.read' < json.wFY |
94.9 ± 0.7 |
93.8 |
96.8 |
27.65 ± 6.02 |
yq eval -j -I=0 < json.wFY |
3087.0 ± 26.6 |
3049.3 |
3126.8 |
899.63 ± 195.81 |
And here is the pretty print counterpart benchmark