Storybook currently calls react-scripts. However, I've got some parts of the CRA config overriden with craco. It means my application is invoked with craco ..., rather than react-scripts ....
Is there a clean solution to have Storybook call craco instead?
The solution I came up with is this :
.storybook/main.js :
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
stories: ['../src/**/*.stories.js'],
addons: [
'@storybook/preset-create-react-app',
'@storybook/addon-actions',
'@storybook/addon-links',
'@storybook/addon-viewport/register',
'@storybook/addon-knobs/register',
],
webpackFinal(config, { configType }) {
return {
...config,
resolve: {
alias: {
...config.resolve.alias,
'~': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/'),
},
},
};
},
};
I was only using the alias feature in my craco file, so here I override webpack config from storybook and only add the alias parameter. For your case, you'll need to add your own config.
The @FR073N solution is good, but since the lasts versions, this throw an error.
One line was missing to fully override correctly the webpack config.
const path = require('path');
module.exports = {
stories: ['../src/**/*.stories.js'],
addons: [
'@storybook/preset-create-react-app',
'@storybook/addon-actions',
'@storybook/addon-links',
'@storybook/addon-viewport/register',
'@storybook/addon-knobs/register',
],
webpackFinal(config, { configType }) {
return {
...config,
resolve: {
...config.resolve, // <= HERE
alias: {
...config.resolve.alias,
'~': path.resolve(__dirname, '../src/'),
},
},
};
},
};
I've successfully used storybook-preset-craco with @storybook@6.3.5 and react-scripts@4.0.3 and @craco/craco@6.2.0 in a new CRA TypeScript project.
