I am doing a unit test, where I check the equality of two Spark dataframes with
Assertions.assertEquals(actualDF.schema(), expectedDF.schema());
If I print the schemas, they look the same:
root
|-- id: long (nullable = true)
|-- idvalue: string (nullable = true)
|-- seqvalue: long (nullable = true)
|-- idconfig: string (nullable = true)
|-- key: string (nullable = true)
|-- value: string (nullable = true)
|-- date: string (nullable = true)
root
|-- id: long (nullable = true)
|-- idvalue: string (nullable = true)
|-- seqvalue: long (nullable = true)
|-- idconfig: string (nullable = true)
|-- key: string (nullable = true)
|-- value: string (nullable = true)
|-- date: string (nullable = true)
However, I get an error message
org.opentest4j.AssertionFailedError: expected: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType@55b9ffd0<StructType(StructField(id,LongType,true), StructField(idvalue,StringType,true), StructField(seqvalue,LongType,true), StructField(idconfig,StringType,true), StructField(key,StringType,true), StructField(value,StringType,true), StructField(date,StringType,true))> but was: org.apache.spark.sql.types.StructType@a5f5b96<StructType(StructField(id,LongType,true), StructField(idvalue,StringType,true), StructField(seqvalue,LongType,true), StructField(idconfig,StringType,true), StructField(key,StringType,true), StructField(value,StringType,true), StructField(date,StringType,true))>
Expected :StructType(StructField(id,LongType,true), StructField(idvalue,StringType,true), StructField(seqvalue,LongType,true), StructField(idconfig,StringType,true), StructField(key,StringType,true), StructField(value,StringType,true), StructField(date,StringType,true))
Actual :StructType(StructField(id,LongType,true), StructField(idvalue,StringType,true), StructField(seqvalue,LongType,true), StructField(idconfig,StringType,true), StructField(key,StringType,true), StructField(value,StringType,true), StructField(date,StringType,true))
The only difference I see is that weird number StructType@55b9ff0
vs. StructType@a5f5b96
in the first line, from which I don't know what it means and why it is relevant.