423

Suppose I have a string:

"34234234d124"

I want to get the last four characters of this string which is "d124". I can use SubString, but it needs a couple of lines of code, including naming a variable.

Is it possible to get this result in one expression with C#?

Colonel Panic
  • 132,665
  • 89
  • 401
  • 465
KentZhou
  • 24,805
  • 41
  • 134
  • 200

27 Answers27

526
mystring.Substring(Math.Max(0, mystring.Length - 4)); //how many lines is this?

If you're positive the length of your string is at least 4, then it's even shorter:

mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - 4);
Armen Tsirunyan
  • 130,161
  • 59
  • 324
  • 434
231

You can use an extension method:

public static class StringExtension
{
    public static string GetLast(this string source, int tail_length)
    {
       if(tail_length >= source.Length)
          return source;
       return source.Substring(source.Length - tail_length);
    }
}

And then call:

string mystring = "34234234d124";
string res = mystring.GetLast(4);
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Stecya
  • 22,896
  • 10
  • 72
  • 102
103

Update 2020: C# 8.0 finally makes this easy:

> "C# 8.0 finally makes this easy"[^4..]
"easy"

You can also slice arrays in the same way, see Indices and ranges.

Colonel Panic
  • 132,665
  • 89
  • 401
  • 465
  • 2
  • 1
    Sad it is only on .Net Core or/and Standard. This is beautiful. – DoomerDGR8 Aug 31 '20 at 08:49
  • 1
    This is another one of those times I wish I was still writing Python, where this has just been the normal way of doing things from the start. – A.R. Mar 18 '21 at 04:52
  • Best solution for C# 8.0 and above – Jesús Jiménez Dec 22 '21 at 19:33
  • 3
    Unfortunately, if you're not sure the string will have at least 4 characters, then C# 8.0 ranges will still need the guard against ArgumentOutOfRangeException that Armen's answer gives. I can't think of anything more elegant than: `var s = "not quite so easy"; s[^Math.Min(19, s.Length)..];` :( – mo. Jul 13 '22 at 18:45
  • 2
    Here's an easier to read out of range protection. Jam on a PadLeft or PadRight `"C# 8.0 finally makes this easy".PadLeft(4)[^4..]` – Aaron Hudon Feb 08 '23 at 17:11
69

All you have to do is..

String result = mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - 4);
thestar
  • 4,959
  • 2
  • 28
  • 22
50

Ok, so I see this is an old post, but why are we rewriting code that is already provided in the framework?

I would suggest that you add a reference to the framework DLL "Microsoft.VisualBasic"

using Microsoft.VisualBasic;
//...

string value = Strings.Right("34234234d124", 4);
RJ Programmer
  • 788
  • 5
  • 7
  • 9
    Nice example of a time to use the VB functionality – Brian White Mar 18 '13 at 16:25
  • 3
    I love you. Most of my programming experience is VB, so finding out that I can use all of those functions that I'm so familiar with is awesome – Ben Strombeck Sep 01 '13 at 01:39
  • 8
    I can never figure out if using MS.VB a good idea -- why is it shunted into the `VisualBasic` namespace? [`TextFieldParser`](http://stackoverflow.com/a/5865879/1028230) is another example. Why are these utilities factored so strangely? – ruffin May 12 '14 at 18:26
  • 1
    @ruffin: Essentially these were all VB6 built-in functions. They were implemented initially in the framework to make upgrading VB6 code easier. That said, there are many useful utility functions from VB6 that I like to use and being they are now part of the .NET framework, I can continue to leverage them in my C# code. – RJ Programmer May 23 '14 at 15:54
  • 6
    I feel like this should be the accepted answer. Why re-invent the wheel? – Zack Aug 04 '14 at 16:54
  • Am I right to assume that namespace is going to be wiped out at some point? And then, when you upgrade, you will have the problems that Microsoft tried to avoid when people were upgrading from VB6. – Fabio Milheiro Dec 04 '15 at 11:04
  • 2
    @Bomboca: We can be assured that it will continue as long a Microsoft continues to support Visual Basic. It is included in the 4.6 release and I cannot find anything either explicit or implied from MS that they plan to stop supporting VB.Net as a development language. – RJ Programmer Dec 14 '15 at 21:11
  • 1
    @RJProgrammer vb is still to common to be wiped out. – Mafii Jul 07 '16 at 11:54
  • 1
    @Zack, why would you take on the dependency of an *entire* dll to save yourself a 3 line extension method that could be added anywhere? That solution doesn't scale well. If the questions was about vb.... maybe, but I can't see a reason c# devs should take that in. – KyleMit Jan 11 '19 at 14:46
  • 2
    @KyleMit, the dependency is a framework component. It's already in the Global Assembly Cache and deployed with the dotnet framework. If this were a nuget or external reference, I'd understand your concern. Still you bring up a valid point. Of course, an extension method would be a workable solution here. However, that is also code to test, maintain and support. There are trade offs both ways. This response was just pointing out an alternative solution. – RJ Programmer Jan 14 '19 at 15:07
  • 2
    @RJProgrammer, all fair points, and certainly not harmful to point out when a method/solution already exists. And comments are also an okay place to hash out the viability of a solution. I wonder if this solution still works cross platform inside of .NET Core? Anything that has to get pulled in (nuget, etc.) is a pretty hard dependency, but even relying on a library assumes no breaking changes when it's reversioned. But good point on testing, maintaining your own code as well as a trade off though – KyleMit Jan 14 '19 at 16:32
  • 1
    I always wondered - if there is real concern about VB, why not add these to the c# libs? I'm c# now, but I used to love programming in VB. Everything just worked, and I preferred just typing rather than constantly pecking out special characters - and don't get me started on case sensitivity in programming languages. – Steve Nov 06 '19 at 19:51
30
string mystring = "34234234d124";
mystring = mystring.Substring(mystring.Length-4)
Cem
  • 889
  • 2
  • 10
  • 22
26

Using Substring is actually quite short and readable:

 var result = mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - Math.Min(4, mystring.Length));
 // result == "d124"
dtb
  • 213,145
  • 36
  • 401
  • 431
19

Here is another alternative that shouldn't perform too badly (because of deferred execution):

new string(mystring.Reverse().Take(4).Reverse().ToArray());

Although an extension method for the purpose mystring.Last(4) is clearly the cleanest solution, albeit a bit more work.

Andre Luus
  • 3,692
  • 3
  • 33
  • 46
  • 1
    @BrianWhite People are cranky after new year's? – Konrad Viltersten Mar 27 '13 at 20:48
  • 1
    Nice solution. i like it. But you forgot other Reverse to get correct string. Must be: new string(mystring.Reverse().Take(4).Reverse().ToArray()); – Yuri Morales Apr 30 '13 at 18:45
  • Aah yes, you are correct - my mental compiler didn't think that far. Sadly that makes it appear even worse! :) – Andre Luus May 02 '13 at 06:59
  • 1
    Because of ToArray there is no deferred execution –  Jul 09 '16 at 13:39
  • And there wouldn't be anyway because of `new string` –  Jul 09 '16 at 13:39
  • 1
    I don't think you understand, @BjörnAliGöransson, my point was that the `Reverse().Take(4).Reverse()` don't each enumerate the entire string, it only happens at the final `ToArray` call. If there weren't such a thing as deferred execution, it would translate to `Reverse().ToArray().Take(4).ToArray().Reverse().ToArray()`. This, of course, assumes those extensions are the deferred type - which I didn't check. The String constructors don't accept IEnumerable, so you have to enumerate it to an array at that point. – Andre Luus Jul 19 '16 at 08:19
  • dotnetcore 2.1 has `TakeLast()` method – SerjG Jun 27 '18 at 08:26
  • It works but performance wise... I would take this as the last options. In fact the worse solution of all – Shah May 26 '20 at 17:11
  • Not only is this inefficient, if you want LINQ, why not just `mystring.Skip(mystring.Length - 4)` – nawfal Jun 24 '22 at 16:41
15

You can simply use Substring method of C#. For ex.

string str = "1110000";
string lastFourDigits = str.Substring((str.Length - 4), 4);

It will return result 0000.

Amit Kumawat
  • 574
  • 5
  • 11
  • 13
    This has been answered like 28 times and you added it again? And why use the two-parameters-overload instead of the one that only receives `startIndex`? – Andrew Apr 26 '17 at 17:45
  • Exactly the answer i needed.Thanks for sharing @Amit Kumawat. – Daryl Mar 11 '19 at 09:36
11

A simple solution would be:

string mystring = "34234234d124";
string last4 = mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - 4, 4);
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Anees Deen
  • 1,385
  • 2
  • 17
  • 31
11

Definition:

public static string GetLast(string source, int last)
{
     return last >= source.Length ? source : source.Substring(source.Length - last);
}

Usage:

GetLast("string of", 2);

Result:

of

Erçin Dedeoğlu
  • 4,950
  • 4
  • 49
  • 69
11
string var = "12345678";

var = var[^4..];

// var = "5678"

This is index operator that literally means "take last four chars from end (^4) until the end (..)"

Tropin Alexey
  • 606
  • 1
  • 7
  • 16
  • 6
    Please don't post only code as answer, but also provide an explanation what your code does and how it solves the problem of the question. Answers with an explanation are usually more helpful and of better quality, and are more likely to attract upvotes. – Tyler2P Dec 28 '20 at 13:14
7

Compared to some previous answers, the main difference is that this piece of code takes into consideration when the input string is:

  1. Null
  2. Longer than or matching the requested length
  3. Shorter than the requested length.

Here it is:

public static class StringExtensions
{
    public static string Right(this string str, int length)
    {
        return str.Substring(str.Length - length, length);
    }

    public static string MyLast(this string str, int length)
    {
        if (str == null)
            return null;
        else if (str.Length >= length)
            return str.Substring(str.Length - length, length);
        else
            return str;
    }
}
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Marcelo Finki
  • 140
  • 2
  • 8
7

Full overview over variants: I would like to extend the existing answer mentioning using new ranges in C# 8 or higher: Just slicing with mystring[^4..] (here example 3) seems very easy, but this has some pitfalls as you will see:

To make the code usable for all possible strings, even those shorter than 4, there is some form of condition needed! If you want to copy code, I suggest example 5 or 6.

string mystring ="C# 8.0 finally makes slicing possible";

1: Slicing taking the end part- by specifying how many characters to omit from the beginning- this is, what VS 2019 suggests:

string example1 = mystring[Math.Max(0, mystring.Length - 4)..] ;

2: Slicing taking the end part- by specifying how many characters to take from the end:

string example2 = mystring[^Math.Min(mystring.Length, 4)..] ;

3: Slicing taking the end part- by replacing Max/Min with the ?: operator:

string example3 = (mystring.length > 4)? mystring[^4..] : mystring); 

Personally, I like the second and third variant more than the first.

MS doc reference for Indices and ranges:

Null? But we are not done yet concerning universality. Every example so far will throw an exception for null strings. To consider null (if you don´t use non-nullable strings with C# 8 or higher), and to do it without 'if' (classic example 'with if' already given in another answer) we need:

4: Slicing considering null- by specifying how many characters to omit:

string example4 = mystring?[Math.Max(0, mystring.Length - 4)..] ?? string.Empty;

5: Slicing considering null- by specifying how many characters to take:

string example5 = mystring?[^Math.Min(mystring.Length, 4)..] ?? string.Empty;

6: Slicing considering null with the ?: operator (and two other '?' operators ;-) :
(You cannot put that in a whole in a string interpolation e.g. for WriteLine.)

string example6 = (mystring?.Length > 4) ? filePath[^4..] : mystring ?? string.Empty;

7: Equivalent variant with good old Substring() for C# 6 or 7.x:
(You cannot put that in a whole in a string interpolation e.g. for WriteLine.)

string example7 = (mystring?.Length > 4) ? mystring.Substring(mystring.Length- 4) : mystring ?? string.Empty;

Graceful degradation? I like the new features of C#. Putting them on one line like in the last examples maybe looks a bit excessive. We ended up a little perl´ish didn´t we? But it´s a good example for learning and ok for me to use it once in a tested library method. Even better that we can get rid of null in modern C# if we want and avoid all this null-specific handling.

Such a library/extension method as a shortcut is really useful. Despite the advances in C# you have to write your own to get something easier to use than repeating the code above for every small string manipulation need.

I am one of those who began with BASIC, and 40 years ago there was already Right$(,). Funny, that it is possible to use Strings.Right(,) from VB with C# still too as was shown in another answer. This was and is very easy to use without having all the edge cases..

C# has chosen precision over graceful degradation (in opposite to old BASIC) by which I mean, it always throws an exception if something not clear happens instead of using a default which works for most cases.. Consequent, but I don't think that this way has much future as last examples show. Having default configurations with options would be more convenient. Anyway it is easy to overcome this with some self-written library routines.

So copy any appropriate variant you like in these answers and define a graceful shortcut function for yourself, mine is an extension function called RightChars(int).

Philm
  • 3,448
  • 1
  • 29
  • 28
6
mystring = mystring.Length > 4 ? mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - 4, 4) : mystring;
6

This works nice, as there are no errors if there are less characters in the string than the requested amount.

using System.Linq;

string.Concat("123".TakeLast(4));
Noob
  • 710
  • 11
  • 15
5

It is just this:

int count = 4;
string sub = mystring.Substring(mystring.Length - count, count);
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Daniel DiPaolo
  • 55,313
  • 14
  • 116
  • 115
5
            string x = "34234234d124";

            string y = x.Substring(x.Length - 4);
Abd
  • 69
  • 1
  • 5
  • 1
    You could consider showing a working example with sample inputs and outputs. That said, this is a strait forward answer. – EtherDragon Oct 28 '21 at 17:27
3

This won't fail for any length string.

string mystring = "34234234d124";
string last4 = Regex.Match(mystring, "(?!.{5}).*").Value;
// last4 = "d124"
last4 = Regex.Match("d12", "(?!.{5}).*").Value;
// last4 = "d12"

This is probably overkill for the task at hand, but if there needs to be additional validation, it can possibly be added to the regular expression.

Edit: I think this regex would be more efficient:

@".{4}\Z"
agent-j
  • 27,335
  • 5
  • 52
  • 79
  • 5
    Definitely overkill. I would stick with simple string methods for this. – tsells Jan 16 '14 at 14:49
  • The second variant does not return a three letter string when called with a three letter argument, so it is not equivalent to your first ingenious version using negative lookahead! :-) – avl_sweden Dec 29 '14 at 14:19
3

Using the range operator is the easiest way for me. No many codes is required.

In your case, you can get what you want like this:

// the ^ operator indicates the element position from the end of a sequence
string str = "34234234d124"[^4..] 
Quyết
  • 502
  • 5
  • 12
1

Use a generic Last<T>. That will work with ANY IEnumerable, including string.

public static IEnumerable<T> Last<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, int nLastElements)
{
    int count = Math.Min(enumerable.Count(), nLastElements);
    for (int i = enumerable.Count() - count; i < enumerable.Count(); i++)
    {
        yield return enumerable.ElementAt(i);
    }
}

And a specific one for string:

public static string Right(this string str, int nLastElements)
{
    return new string(str.Last(nLastElements).ToArray());
}
Peter Mortensen
  • 30,738
  • 21
  • 105
  • 131
Adriano Carneiro
  • 57,693
  • 12
  • 90
  • 123
1

Suggest using TakeLast method, for example: new String(text.TakeLast(4).ToArray())

nikolai.serdiuk
  • 762
  • 8
  • 11
0

I threw together some code modified from various sources that will get the results you want, and do a lot more besides. I've allowed for negative int values, int values that exceed the length of the string, and for end index being less than the start index. In that last case, the method returns a reverse-order substring. There are plenty of comments, but let me know if anything is unclear or just crazy. I was playing around with this to see what all I might use it for.

    /// <summary>
    /// Returns characters slices from string between two indexes.
    /// 
    /// If start or end are negative, their indexes will be calculated counting 
    /// back from the end of the source string. 
    /// If the end param is less than the start param, the Slice will return a 
    /// substring in reverse order.
    /// 
    /// <param name="source">String the extension method will operate upon.</param>
    /// <param name="startIndex">Starting index, may be negative.</param>
    /// <param name="endIndex">Ending index, may be negative).</param>
    /// </summary>
    public static string Slice(this string source, int startIndex, int endIndex = int.MaxValue)
    {
        // If startIndex or endIndex exceeds the length of the string they will be set 
        // to zero if negative, or source.Length if positive.
        if (source.ExceedsLength(startIndex)) startIndex = startIndex < 0 ? 0 : source.Length;
        if (source.ExceedsLength(endIndex)) endIndex = endIndex < 0 ? 0 : source.Length;

        // Negative values count back from the end of the source string.
        if (startIndex < 0) startIndex = source.Length + startIndex;
        if (endIndex < 0) endIndex = source.Length + endIndex;         

        // Calculate length of characters to slice from string.
        int length = Math.Abs(endIndex - startIndex);
        // If the endIndex is less than the startIndex, return a reversed substring.
        if (endIndex < startIndex) return source.Substring(endIndex, length).Reverse();

        return source.Substring(startIndex, length);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Reverses character order in a string.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="source"></param>
    /// <returns>string</returns>
    public static string Reverse(this string source)
    {
        char[] charArray = source.ToCharArray();
        Array.Reverse(charArray);
        return new string(charArray);
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// Verifies that the index is within the range of the string source.
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="source"></param>
    /// <param name="index"></param>
    /// <returns>bool</returns>
    public static bool ExceedsLength(this string source, int index)
    {
        return Math.Abs(index) > source.Length ? true : false;
    }

So if you have a string like "This is an extension method", here are some examples and results to expect.

var s = "This is an extension method";
// If you want to slice off end characters, just supply a negative startIndex value
// but no endIndex value (or an endIndex value >= to the source string length).
Console.WriteLine(s.Slice(-5));
// Returns "ethod".
Console.WriteLine(s.Slice(-5, 10));
// Results in a startIndex of 22 (counting 5 back from the end).
// Since that is greater than the endIndex of 10, the result is reversed.
// Returns "m noisnetxe"
Console.WriteLine(s.Slice(2, 15));
// Returns "is is an exte"

Hopefully this version is helpful to someone. It operates just like normal if you don't use any negative numbers, and provides defaults for out of range params.

Irish
  • 1,407
  • 1
  • 10
  • 9
0
string var = "12345678";

if (var.Length >= 4)
{
    var = var.substring(var.Length - 4, 4)
}

// result = "5678"
TResponse
  • 3,940
  • 7
  • 43
  • 63
Eidan
  • 9
  • 1
0

assuming you wanted the strings in between a string which is located 10 characters from the last character and you need only 3 characters.

Let's say StreamSelected = "rtsp://72.142.0.230:80/SMIL-CHAN-273/4CIF-273.stream"

In the above, I need to extract the "273" that I will use in database query

        //find the length of the string            
        int streamLen=StreamSelected.Length;

        //now remove all characters except the last 10 characters
        string streamLessTen = StreamSelected.Remove(0,(streamLen - 10));   

        //extract the 3 characters using substring starting from index 0
        //show Result is a TextBox (txtStreamSubs) with 
        txtStreamSubs.Text = streamLessTen.Substring(0, 3);
RBT
  • 24,161
  • 21
  • 159
  • 240
Shinn_33
  • 19
  • 3
  • This question explicitly asks for the last four characters in the string. You seem to be answering a different question related to extracting things from the middle of the string. Also `Substring` already lets you pass in a start point and length so not sure why you wouldn't use that rather than using `Remove` to remove the beginning first. – Chris Oct 04 '16 at 13:33
0
public static string Last(this string source, int tailLength)
{
  return tailLength >= source.Length ? source : source[^tailLength..];
}
Blastfurnace
  • 18,411
  • 56
  • 55
  • 70
  • 1
    While this code snippet may solve the question, [including an explanation](http://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/114762/explaining-entirely-code-based-answers) will help people understand the reasons for your code suggestion. – Gerhard Sep 07 '21 at 07:04
0

This is a bit more than the OP question, but is an example of how to use the last 3 of a string for a specific purpose. In my case, I wanted to do a numerical sort (LINQ OrderBy) on a number field that is stored as a string (1 to 3 digit numbers.) So, to get the string numbers to sort like numeric numbers, I need to left-pad the string numbers with zeros and then take the last 3. The resulting OrderBy statement is:

myList = myList.OrderBy(x => string.Concat("00",x.Id)[^3..])

The string.Concat() used in the OrderBy statement results in strings like "001", "002", "011", "021", "114" which sort the way they would if they were stored as numbers.

randyh22
  • 463
  • 4
  • 10