I tried PhantomJS as in katspaugh's answer, but ran into several issues trying to manipulate pages. My use case was modifying the static html output of Doxygen, without modifying Doxygen itself. The goal was to reduce delivered file size by remove unnecessary elements from the page, and convert it to HTML5. Additionally I also wanted to use jQuery to access and modify elements more easily.
Loading the page in PhantomJS
The APIs appear to have changed drastically since the accepted answer. Additionally, I used a different approach (derived from this answer), which will be important in mitigating one of the major issues I encountered.
var system = require('system');
var fs = require('fs');
var page = require('webpage').create();
// Reading the page's content into your "webpage"
// This automatically refreshes the page
page.content = fs.read(system.args[1]);
// Make all your changes here
fs.write(system.args[2], page.content, 'w');
phantom.exit();
Preventing JavaScript from Running
My page uses Google Analytics in the footer, and now the page is modified beyond my intention, presumably because javascript was run. If we disable javascript, we can't actually use jQuery to modify the page, so that isn't an option. I've tried temporarily changing the tag, but when I do, every special character is replaced with an html-escaped equivalent, destroying all javascript code on the page. Then, I came across this answer, which gave me the following idea.
var rawPageString = fs.read(system.args[1]);
rawPageString = rawPageString.replace(/<script type="text\/javascript"/g, "<script type='foo/bar'");
rawPageString = rawPageString.replace(/<script>/g, "<script type='foo/bar'>");
page.content = rawPageString;
// Make all your changes here
rawPageString = page.content;
rawPageString = rawPageString.replace(/<script type='foo\/bar'/g, "<script");
Adding jQuery
There's actually an example on how to use jQuery. However, I thought an offline copy would be more appropriate. Initially I tried using page.includeJs as in the example, but found that page.injectJs was more suitable for the use case. Unlike includeJs, there's no <script>
tag added to the page context, and the call blocks execution which simplifies the code. jQuery was placed in the same directory I was executing my script from.
page.injectJs("jquery-2.1.4.min.js");
page.evaluate(function () {
// Make all changes here
// Remove the foo/bar type more easily here
$("script[type^=foo]").removeAttr("type");
});
fs.write(system.args[2], page.content, 'w');
phantom.exit();
Putting it All Together
var system = require('system');
var fs = require('fs');
var page = require('webpage').create();
var rawPageString = fs.read(system.args[1]);
// Prevent in-page javascript execution
rawPageString = rawPageString.replace(/<script type="text\/javascript"/g, "<script type='foo/bar'");
rawPageString = rawPageString.replace(/<script>/g, "<script type='foo/bar'>");
page.content = rawPageString;
page.injectJs("jquery-2.1.4.min.js");
page.evaluate(function () {
// Make all changes here
// Remove the foo/bar type
$("script[type^=foo]").removeAttr("type");
});
fs.write(system.args[2], page.content, 'w');
phantom.exit();
Using it from the command line:
phantomjs modify-html-file.js "input_file.html" "output_file.html"
Note: This was tested and working with PhantomJS 2.0.0 on Windows 8.1.
Pro tip: If speed matters, you should consider iterating the files from within your PhantomJS script rather than a shell script. This will avoid the latency that PhantomJS has when starting up.