from the borrowing rule:
- At any given time, you can have either one mutable reference or any number of immutable references.
Below, I have a mutable borrow of the struct Foo (the whole struct), which means I borrow every field of this struct. However, I can have another borrow to its field in demo
function. And I suspect I have 2 mutable references to x.a
:
#[derive(Debug)]
struct Foo {
a: i32,
b: i32,
}
fn demo(foo: &mut Foo) {
// the `foo` is mutable borrow
// should have exclusive access to all elements of Foo instance
// However,
let bar = &mut foo.a; // second ref to `x.a`
*bar += 1;
let baz = &foo.b;
println!("{:?}", bar);
println!("{:?}", baz);
}
fn main() {
let mut x = Foo { a: 10, b: 1 };
let foo = &mut x; // ref to x, implies borrowing x.a and x.b
demo(foo);
}
I know we can have disjoint mutable borrow to a struct binding (split borrow reference), but I'm not sure whether splitting the reference to a struct violates the borrow rule.
clarification: above code can compile. My confusion is that it should not compile due to the aforementioned reason. (playground)
I found this link relevant.
When you are borrowing a structure mutably, you are then free to borrow any of the sub-elements mutably.
But I can't find any doc to support it.