4

Initially I asked this Question and written my own plugin to achieve the same,But i am facing very strange issue regarding to css of table.
After applying the plugin table cells borders are getting dis-sorted.

jsFiddle of the problem: Problem demo

In fiddle you can see that after first cell of the first tr, the header border line and table border line don't line up. I want the border line of thead cells and td cells to line up. Can anyone tell me how to achieve that?

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Vivek
  • 10,978
  • 14
  • 48
  • 66
  • There's a myriad of issues in your code, I'm working on a long post that goes over resolving them step-by-step. You would do well to use descriptive variables and indent by scope, as it's part of the reason your question has gone vastly ignored despite the 200 bounty. – Incognito Aug 15 '11 at 13:47
  • i have posted here a working code...it works for one table but not for second one...and would you please tell me what issue you have found in my code.. – Vivek Aug 16 '11 at 10:11
  • Multiple issues, like I said, it's a lot of detail because there's quite a bit of problems. Style is a huge issue, you use one-letter-variables all over the place, your closure doesn't pass a value to the argument, the IF statements are better written differntly, you try and cram things onto one line. You in-line css styles and use deprecated attributes. All in all, it's highly unreadable, and that's why you've only had a handful of answers despite sacrificing 200 rep points. I'm writing a long response that takes you through step-by-step each issue, and finds the reasons it breaks. – Incognito Aug 16 '11 at 12:59
  • ok.i will look in to it...but as of now have you any suggestion how can i do this..? – Vivek Aug 17 '11 at 06:15
  • when i can get your long response? i am waiting for it..i want to know how can i improve my coding standard – Vivek Aug 17 '11 at 06:18
  • It'll happen when I get around to it. Maybe later tonight when I get home. – Incognito Aug 17 '11 at 13:03
  • Just noticing. Everything works fine if you browser is wide enough to show the entire table on load. – Fresheyeball Aug 18 '11 at 02:33
  • no...i am getting this table with ajax call... – Vivek Aug 18 '11 at 06:18
  • You should give the bonus to Juhana. I'm upvoting him incase the time-out does something weird (as we both were at 6 upvotes). – Incognito Aug 19 '11 at 02:37
  • @Incognito-Ok..any way i was planning to give bonus point to you...bcoz i found your answer most explanatory. but as you say..it goes to Juhana. :) – Vivek Aug 19 '11 at 05:33

5 Answers5

9

Looks like all you have to do is to take the padding into account: each cell has 3 px padding both left and righ so you have to add 6 px to the width:

$t.find('tr:first th').each(function(){cols.push($(this).width()+6);});

Otherwise the cells with only one word inside will "push" the actual width a bit wider so that the word will fit and other cells with space to move will compensate by becoming a bit narrower. The header and the body both do this independently with different contents which creates the difference in actual cell widths.

EDIT: For Firefox you also need to widen the table so that the cells fit. After calculating the column widths add

var actualWidth = $t.width()+cols.length*6;
$t.width( actualWidth );

And later change the wrapper to:

$wrap.css({width:actualWidth,height:o.height,overflow:'auto'});

EDIT 2: To have both the header and the body scroll simultaneously you need to wrap them both to an outer div that handles the scrolling.

var $outerWrap = $( '<div>' ).css( {width:"300px", overflow:'auto' } );
var $wrap=$('<div>').css(
 { width:actualWidth,height:o.height,"overflow-y":'auto', "overflow-x":'hidden' }
);

$firstRow.wrap( $outerWrap );
$firstRow.after( $wrap );
$wrap.append( $t );

Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/YcRTz/2/

JJJ
  • 32,902
  • 20
  • 89
  • 102
  • your demo is having the same problem as i am having in my problem demo..`thead` and `td` cells are not lining up.. – Vivek Aug 12 '11 at 09:30
  • Works fine for me (Chrome). Which browser are you using? – JJJ Aug 12 '11 at 09:35
  • I've edited the answer. That should fix it for Firefox. I don't have IE right now to test with. – JJJ Aug 12 '11 at 09:55
  • Thanks a lot dude it's working now...on both ie and Firefox, but i have encounter one problem. while i am scrolling to right only body parts get scrolled not header part..you can see it in your fiddle..how can i scroll both header and body simultaneously . – Vivek Aug 12 '11 at 10:05
  • Thanks a ton man...i want to kiss you..you have done it...it's working like a charm.. – Vivek Aug 12 '11 at 11:57
9

Lets start by doing a bit of a clean up of the code you posted so I can actually read your code and maintain a firm grasp on reality while we go down this rabbit hole.

If you write clean code, your problems will be exceptionally easier to see.

So lets clean it up and watch as all the problems here reveal themselves.

Step one: Your jsFiddle sets it to run "onDomReady," which basically means you've got $(document).ready(...) calling all the code in the box, which is fine, except you're got another got $(document).ready(...) inside there. Lets change that.

Step two: Lets add some white space and proper indentation in there, and stop using these one letter variable names.

{} are scope brackets, they should indent, not cover everything, they let us know what part of scope something is in.

Don't write .each() loops on one line, this adds no value and makes your code confusing to read.

$t should be called something meaningful, lets try element, because it holds the $(this) element, which is the active element you're working with.

w should be called something meaningful, but since you only use it twice I'm just going with element.width().

o needs to be less ambiguious, lets go with obj.

Step three: Selection structures

if(typeof(i)=='number')o.height=i;
else if(typeof(i)=='object')o=i;
else if(typeof(i)=='undefined')o={height:300}

Break that up, make it readable. Saving lines doesn't make you a better program, writing clean and easily understandable code will.

Why not use the switch-case statement?

    switch (typeof(i)){
        case "number":
            o.height=i;
            break;
        case "object":
            o=i;
            break;
        case "undefined":
            o={height:300};
            break;
    }

Step four: Don't in-line styles. Just don't. There's no reason to do it, and it makes everyone's life harder.

Instead, lets just place the styles gently into the style sheet where it belongs, and make the parent=$('...') line look like parent=$('<div><div></div></div>').appendTo('body');.

Step five: Closure doesn't pass any value to arguments

After a bit of clean up, we see this block of code:

self.width(self.width() - 
    function(width){
        var parent,child;
        if(width===undefined){
            parent=$('<div><div></div></div>').appendTo('body');
            child=parent.children();
            width= (child.innerWidth()) - (child.height(99).innerWidth());
            parent.remove();
        }
        return width;
    }()
);

Okay, that's a problem. Lets cut out a few lines to point out the problem here:

self.width(
   self.width() - 
    function(width){
        /*...*/
        if(width===undefined){
            /*...*/
        }
        return width;
    }()
);

So, a quick refresher on this pattern you have here:

(function(arg1){
    /*code*/
})(data);

Data gets passed to arg1. Arg1 declaires a variable in the scope local to that function, it doesn't get anything from outside. Outside data is passed in through the set of () that call the function, which your code had left abandoned. Think of it this way:

var msg = function(text) {
    alert(text);
};

Then you call it as...

msg("hello world");

What your closure is doing is almost the same thing, except where you define your function, you also call it. Thus...

(function(text) {
    alert(text);
})("hello world");

So, you need to pass a value of some sort into there, other wise this whole thing is always undefined. Lets do that. What are we passing? I have no way to be sure. This is why programmers need to add comments to their code.

Step six: Comment your code so people other than yourself will look at this code and have not a damn clue what you truthfuly wanted to do, and can only guess. It's like you posted a 200 point bounty and didn't bother helping people who want to help you. Why are you doing this to yourself, dude? Why couldn't you just go //This is what this does to give me a hint? What did I ever do to you?

Step Seven: Lets see if we can make the JS changes work with the JS Fiddle

Great odin... that HTML's 2000 lines long?

Okay, I'm working with pastebin here for the sake of saving space in the post here.

Alright, you started off with this: http://pastebin.com/xjmm4cev

You're using a lot of no-wrap, and putting classes onto individual elements. You shouldn't have to do this on each HTML element, CSS takes care of that very effectively, so lets go ahead and just rip out all the nowrap=nowrap and class="header" stuff (we'll put it back in a moment, but only ONE per group, not each element).

Then lets get rid of the useless blank lines.

Lets run this through HTML tidy and get it nice and indented correctly.

http://pastebin.com/uHtSZ4h5

Much easier to read over. Okay, so what do we see here? Well, it looks like you keep going in circles, cutting and pasting the same thing again and again. You also in-line javascript such as using onchange and onclick attributes. This is generally an awful thing to do to your code, and makes it hard to maintain (as I'm sure you've seen with this 2000+ line beast of cut+paste 27 times in a row).

So, lets take a look here:

  1. elements, not inside a form
  2. Elements in a table that are outside of rows, but not head/body/footer sections of a table
  3. Code that's a huge pain to maintain because it keep going in circles, if you need to change this, you're basically screwed.

Lets fix all that.

  1. We're going to use events in the tags, rather than in-line things. So, all of those in-line onchange and click attributes get the boot.
  2. All of these inputs that are just floating around need to get put into a form, and taken out of this place in tables that only rows or table sections belong in.
  3. Figure out how we can not have excessive input elements, if we can help it.
  4. What the heck is the )="" that you have on every input button? Deleted.

So, here's all of your hidden boxes: http://pastebin.com/LXZSkvyf which I've removed, because we don't have a anywhere.

And here's what the code looks like without all of these weird things in it: http://pastebin.com/MiaJTGpb

Much more readable, but still not quite there.

Step 8: What can you do to make the HTML of the table work better?

  1. You're using Thead and Tbody, and that's good.
  2. You're using attributes for things like cellpadding, that's bad.
  3. You've given each body row an ID. I don't feel you needed to do this, but it's not always bad. However, I'll show you how you could work without it.
  4. You give some selects a select-box class, but it's nowhere in the css. I've removed it.
  5. You give a title attribute to the selects that says "option_value". The title attribute is generally used to make a tool-tip popup when you leave the mouse over something. I'm not sure what you're going to do here, but that's bound to confuse your user. I'd highly suggest giving something better than option_value in that place.
  6. You keep using the ID Submit_FMS_AddDelivery. HTML ID tags are meant to be unique, and used only once on one element. You've got it 27 times, that's bad. I don't think you need an ID on it, so I've removed it.
  7. You've also got input-btn going on, I'm removing it, because you haven't shown it's used anywhere.
  8. You probably don't need any of these ID tags on select and TR to be honest, so I'm pulling them.

What's that look like? Basically, you've got what's almost just the data, in it's nice pure form. That's good. http://pastebin.com/UNS6CAtb

Step 9: What were you trying to do?

Lets step back and take a look here.

All you really wanted to do was keep a fixed header, but you've ended up doing a lot of JavaScript hacks and manipulating the DOM in a lot of places. We need to stop doing this. Is there a simpler way to do what you want?


I'll have to expand on how to make this function with the rest of your stuff, but I get up for work in a few hours. I'll update again with more... But we'll get there.

Right now, because I haven't fixed what I took out, it doesn't look right. But I'm tired.

So, here's where we are so far: http://jsfiddle.net/5C6z7/ Plus those inputs we took out (and will be going back in later, in a different way)

biphobe
  • 4,525
  • 3
  • 35
  • 46
Incognito
  • 20,537
  • 15
  • 80
  • 120
  • @Incognito-Thanks a lot man to suggest me...to how to write code..i will take care of all these things while writing code or posting on `SO`.waiting for your complete answer..any way +1 for your heart touching efforts. – Vivek Aug 18 '11 at 06:36
  • have you got d time to look into this issue again with your approach.waiting for final answer... – Vivek Aug 23 '11 at 05:47
  • @Vivek I've been adding bits in, but it's hard for me to get the full picture here when you're missing bits of the code, such as what the purpose of the form submission is, how it's managed, the differnt functions you've binded onto everything. Parts of it aren't there for me to look at, so all I can do is guess. – Incognito Aug 23 '11 at 12:51
  • @Incognito - Just think it's normal table(as i have given my table), forget about other thing..i will manage those..just freeze d table header with your approach..:) – Vivek Aug 26 '11 at 06:08
  • @Vivek I'm fairly sure you can accomplish all of that without javascript, just CSS. I'll see what I can do. – Incognito Aug 29 '11 at 14:00
  • +1 for "If you write clean code, your problems will be exceptionally easier to see." – Ryan Kinal Sep 12 '11 at 14:47
  • 2
    2021 called, is this still a draft? – Braiam Feb 16 '21 at 14:59
  • I have no intention of completing this a decade later. Are you just going around trolling or ... What's your point here exactly? – Incognito Feb 17 '21 at 18:55
  • Someone has to finish it. Any reason why you abandoned it and you don't want to finish it? – Dharman Feb 17 '21 at 18:57
3

What about replacing '<th>' tags with '<td>' tags?

No extra js code required.

http://jsfiddle.net/spQAh/7/

biphobe
  • 4,525
  • 3
  • 35
  • 46
1

Okay so instead of troubleshooting or using anything complex, I came up with simple CSS + JS solution to your problem. Take a look at http://jsfiddle.net/TdLQT/

Obviously, the process of making header static, can be made dynamic, meaning trigger it after user scrolls a bit or have it there by default or count other object's position from top window and trigger static behavior when it reaches or exceeds certain pixels. I can provide that if you give me details on exact design of your HTML page.

Anyways, I as you can see, have used fixed pixel heights which you can choose not to or make them elastic or dynamic. What is important to know is that, though solution relies on JS a bit, output position is purely from CSS. I am using classes to manipulate the position.

Tumharyyaaden
  • 2,733
  • 3
  • 19
  • 20
  • i am having the same classes and html as i have given in my fiddle...can you implement this logic on my html – Vivek Aug 05 '11 at 08:08
  • you can see here-http://jsfiddle.net/Ja8Tm/ , while scrolling horizontal i am able to see only those header which are visible first – Vivek Aug 05 '11 at 08:28
  • i am having same html markup as i have given in this fiddle..can you give me any solution using this html – Vivek Aug 05 '11 at 08:28
  • I did not realize you had such a wide table, the reason my solution is not working is because table is too wide, I will try to write bit of JS to solve this problem. – Tumharyyaaden Aug 05 '11 at 23:54
  • @Tumharyyaaden- have you tried something...please advise me what to do...even till today i am at same point where i was 2 days ago...i tried a lot but nothing seems to working..:( – Vivek Aug 08 '11 at 05:37
  • I was thinking about having header separate from data and enclosing both in two divs, and detect horizontal scroll on the bottom and sync/offset the header to match so that they are both the same. I haven't had time to do any coding for this but it sounds easy enough if you wanna try it...or i'll msg you when i get to it – Tumharyyaaden Aug 08 '11 at 15:51
  • i have done the same thing in my plugin using js...but the only problem there is that i am getting css issue..see here - http://jsfiddle.net/spQAh/ – Vivek Aug 09 '11 at 05:35
  • Okay so if you change `width=child.innerWidth()-child.height(99).innerWidth();parent.remove();` TO `width=child.innerWidth()-child.height(99).width();parent.remove();` meaning change innerWidth to width, it will fix the border/width issue but then your header doesnt freeze. again when i get more time i will check your plug-in again. – Tumharyyaaden Aug 09 '11 at 23:57
0

the simple solution is that when you calculate the width of the column you do not include padding. So you need to change the line

$t.find('tr:first th').each( function() {
 cols.push($(this).width());
});

to

$t.find('tr:first th').each( function() {
 cols.push($(this).outerWidth());
});

if your cells have margins use .outerWidth(true)

This works in quirks mode with IE7&8 and Chrome IE8 has a problem in strict mode. However I believe that that problem is caused by the added scrollbar. If you want to use IE8 in strict mode you have to allow for the width of the vertical scrollbar..

Michal
  • 13,439
  • 3
  • 35
  • 33