My question
I encountered a hang-up issue with the combination of threading, multiprocessing, and subprocess. I simplified my situation as below.
import subprocess
import threading
import multiprocessing
class dummy_proc(multiprocessing.Process):
def run(self):
print('run')
while True:
pass
class popen_thread(threading.Thread):
def run(self):
proc = subprocess.Popen('ls -la'.split(), shell=False, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE, stderr=subprocess.PIPE)
stdout_byte, stderr_byte = proc.communicate()
rc = proc.returncode
print(rc)
if __name__ == '__main__':
print('start')
t = popen_thread()
t.start()
p = dummy_proc()
p.start()
t.join()
p.terminate()
In this script, a thread and a process are generated, respectively. The thread just issues the system command ls -la
. The process just loops infinitely. When the thread finishes getting the return code of the system command, it terminates the process and exits immediately.
When I run this script again and again, it sometimes hangs up. I googled this situation and found some articles which seem to be related.
- Is it safe to fork from within a thread?
- Issue with python's subprocess,popen (creating a zombie and getting stuck)
So, I guess the hang-up issue is explained something like below.
- The process is generated between
Popen()
andcommunicate()
. - It inherits some "blocking" status of the thread, and it is never released.
- It prevents the thread from acquiring the result of the
communitare()
.
But I'm not 100% confident, so it would be great if someone helped me explain what happens here.
My environment
I used following environment.
$ uname -a
Linux dell-vostro5490 5.10.96-1-MANJARO #1 SMP PREEMPT Tue Feb 1 16:57:46 UTC 2022 x86_64 GNU/Linux
$ python3 --version
Python 3.9.2
I also tried following environment and got the same result.
$ uname -a
Linux raspberrypi 5.10.17+ #2 Tue Jul 6 21:58:58 PDT 2021 armv6l GNU/Linux
$ python3 --version
Python 3.7.3
What I tried
- Use spawn instead of fork for multiprocessing.
- Use thread instead of process for
dummy_proc
.
In both cases, the issue disappeared. So, I guess this issue is related with the behavior of the fork...