27

How do I suspend a whole process (like the Process Explorer does when I click Suspend) in C#.

I'm starting the Process with Process.Start, and on a certain event, I want to suspend the process to be able to do some investigation on a "snapshot" of it.

Lars Truijens
  • 42,837
  • 6
  • 126
  • 143
Thomas Danecker
  • 4,635
  • 4
  • 32
  • 31

5 Answers5

42

Here's my suggestion:

 [Flags]
    public enum ThreadAccess : int
    {
      TERMINATE = (0x0001),
      SUSPEND_RESUME = (0x0002),
      GET_CONTEXT = (0x0008),
      SET_CONTEXT = (0x0010),
      SET_INFORMATION = (0x0020),
      QUERY_INFORMATION = (0x0040),
      SET_THREAD_TOKEN = (0x0080),
      IMPERSONATE = (0x0100),
      DIRECT_IMPERSONATION = (0x0200)
    }

    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern IntPtr OpenThread(ThreadAccess dwDesiredAccess, bool bInheritHandle, uint dwThreadId);
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern uint SuspendThread(IntPtr hThread);
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern int ResumeThread(IntPtr hThread);
    [DllImport("kernel32", CharSet = CharSet.Auto,SetLastError = true)]
    static extern bool CloseHandle(IntPtr handle);


private static void SuspendProcess(int pid)
{
  var process = Process.GetProcessById(pid); // throws exception if process does not exist

  foreach (ProcessThread pT in process.Threads)
  {
    IntPtr pOpenThread = OpenThread(ThreadAccess.SUSPEND_RESUME, false, (uint)pT.Id);

    if (pOpenThread == IntPtr.Zero)
    {
      continue;
    }

    SuspendThread(pOpenThread);

    CloseHandle(pOpenThread);
  }
}

public static void ResumeProcess(int pid)
{
  var process = Process.GetProcessById(pid);

  if (process.ProcessName == string.Empty)
    return;

  foreach (ProcessThread pT in process.Threads)
  {
    IntPtr pOpenThread = OpenThread(ThreadAccess.SUSPEND_RESUME, false, (uint)pT.Id);

    if (pOpenThread == IntPtr.Zero)
    {
      continue;
    }

    var suspendCount = 0;
    do
    {
      suspendCount = ResumeThread(pOpenThread);
    } while (suspendCount > 0);

    CloseHandle(pOpenThread);
  }
}
daisy
  • 22,498
  • 29
  • 129
  • 265
Magnus Johansson
  • 28,010
  • 19
  • 106
  • 164
  • 1
    I don't think that pOpenThread.Equals(null) will ever return true. It should be pOpenThread == IntPtr.Zero IMO. The rest works just fine! Thanks! – Thomas Danecker Sep 16 '08 at 13:49
  • 1
    Why break; and not continue; ? – Thomas Weller Nov 25 '13 at 12:47
  • [From MSDN](http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms684335.aspx): *When you are finished with the handle, be sure to close it by using the `CloseHandle` function.* – Jonathon Reinhart Jun 21 '14 at 17:35
  • Thanks @JonathonReinhart & devoured, fixed. Also fixed resume to take suspend count into account. – Magnus Johansson Jun 22 '14 at 16:26
  • 1
    In case of errors this code ignores them and continues. This is quite dangerous. It can half-suspend processes without any warning and it can lead to bugs being undetected during testing. Just letting you know. – usr May 30 '16 at 11:35
  • 2
    Also, the resume loop means that already suspended threads will be woken up. This messes with internal state of the target process and likely corrupts it. The correct way would be to store a list of IDs that were suspended and resume them once. – usr May 30 '16 at 11:36
  • I'm not sure if the Process class keeps handles to threads open. Assuming it doesn't, thread could close before you open its handle and the ID could be reused for another process' thread. I'd run `GetProcessIdOfThread` before suspending, to check the thread actually belongs to the process we're suspending. – relatively_random Feb 02 '21 at 16:57
  • Also, assuming that the process could still be launching new threads while you're in the process of suspending, you should probably repeat the entire loop while at least one thread still needed suspending. That would require tracking IDs, like @usr also suggested. – relatively_random Feb 02 '21 at 17:03
13

Thanks to Magnus

After including the Flags, I modified the code a bit to be an extension method in my project. I could now use

var process = Process.GetProcessById(param.PId);
process.Suspend();

Here is the code for those who might be interested.

public static class ProcessExtension
{
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern IntPtr OpenThread(ThreadAccess dwDesiredAccess, bool bInheritHandle, uint dwThreadId);
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern uint SuspendThread(IntPtr hThread);
    [DllImport("kernel32.dll")]
    static extern int ResumeThread(IntPtr hThread);

    public static void Suspend(this Process process)
    {
        foreach (ProcessThread thread in process.Threads)
        {
            var pOpenThread = OpenThread(ThreadAccess.SUSPEND_RESUME, false, (uint)thread.Id);
            if (pOpenThread == IntPtr.Zero)
            {
                break;
            }
            SuspendThread(pOpenThread);
        }
    }
    public static void Resume(this Process process)
    {
        foreach (ProcessThread thread in process.Threads)
        {
            var pOpenThread = OpenThread(ThreadAccess.SUSPEND_RESUME, false, (uint)thread.Id);
            if (pOpenThread == IntPtr.Zero)
            {
                break;
            }
            ResumeThread(pOpenThread);
        }
    }
}

I have a utility done which I use to generally suspend/kill/list a process. Full source is on Git

Sarath
  • 2,719
  • 1
  • 31
  • 39
2

So really, what the other answer's are showing is suspending thread's in the process, there is no way to really suspend the process (i.e. in one call)....

A bit of a different solution would be to actually debug the target process which you are starting, see Mike Stall's blog for some advice how to implement this from a managed context.

If you implement a debugger, you will be able to scan memory or what other snap-shotting you would like.

However, I would like to point out, that technically, there is now way to really do this. Even if you do debugbreak a target debuggee process, another process on your system may inject a thread and will be given some ability to execute code regardless of the state of the target process (even let's say if it's hit a breakpoint due to an access violation), if you have all thread's suspended up to a super high suspend count, are currently at a break point in the main process thread and any other such presumed-frozen status, it is still possible for the system to inject another thread into that process and execute some instructions. You could also go through the trouble of modifying or replacing all of the entry point's the kernel usually calls and so on, but you've now entered the viscous arm's race of MALWARE ;)...

In any case, using the managed interfaces for debugging seems' a fair amount easier than p/invoke'ng a lot of native API call's which will do a poor job of emulating what you probably really want to be doing... using debug api's ;)

RandomNickName42
  • 5,923
  • 1
  • 36
  • 35
1
[DllImport("ntdll.dll", PreserveSig = false)]
    public static extern void NtSuspendProcess(IntPtr processHandle);
    static IntPtr handle;

        string p = "";
        foreach (Process item in Process.GetProcesses())
        {
            if (item.ProcessName == "GammaVPN")
            {
                p = item.ProcessName;
                handle = item.Handle;
                NtSuspendProcess(handle);
            }
        }
        Console.WriteLine(p);
        Console.WriteLine("done");
gerrard
  • 11
  • 1
1

See this CodeProject article for the win32 basics : http://www.codeproject.com/KB/threads/pausep.aspx. This sample code makes use of the ToolHelp32 library from the SDK, so I would recommend turning this sample code into an unmanaged C++/CLI library with a simple interface like "SuspendProcess(uint processID).

Process.Start will return you a Process object, from which you can get the process id, and then pass this to your new library based on the above.

Dave

Dave Moore
  • 4,397
  • 7
  • 25
  • 34