0

Here's the code, where I am trying to create a variable by detecting the words and matching them. Here I use dplyr package and its function mutate in combination with case_when. The problem is I am adding each one of the values manually as you see. How can I automate it by applying some loop functions to match the two?

city <- LETTERS #26 cities
district <- letters[10:20] #11 districts
streets <- paste0(district, district)
streets <- streets[-c(5:26)] #4 streets

df <- data.frame(x = c(1:5), 
           address = c("A, b, cc,", "B, dd", "a, dd", "C", "D, a, cc"))

library(dplyr)
library(stringi)

df2 <- df %>%
  mutate(districts = case_when(
    stri_detect_fixed(address, "b") ~ "b",   #address[1]
                                             #address[2]
    stri_detect_fixed(address, "a") ~ "a",   #address[3]
                                             #address[4]
    stri_detect_fixed(address, "cc") ~ "cc"  #address[5]
))

The code scans through address for the value in district vector. I would love to do the same for city and street variables. So I used the modified version of the code from another question in Stack Overflow. It produces an error.

for (j in town_village2) {
trn_house3[,93] <- case_when(
      stri_detect_fixed(trn_house3[1:6469, 4], j) ~ j)
}

I seek to produce this result:

x    address      city     district   street
1    A, b, cc,      A        b          cc  
2    B, dd          B        NA         dd
3    a, dd          NA       a          dd
4    C              C        NA         NA
5    D, a, cc       D        a          cc

Akbar Ato
  • 29
  • 5

3 Answers3

1

This will separate the elements into vectors:

library(tidyverse)

df <- data.frame(
  x = c(1:5),
  address = c("A, b, cc,", "B, dd", "a, dd", "C", "D, a, cc")
)

df3 <-
  df %>%
  separate_rows(address, sep = "[, ]+") %>%
  filter(nchar(address) > 0) %>%
  nest(address) %>%
  transmute(x, districts = data %>% map(~ .x[[1]]))
#> Warning: All elements of `...` must be named.
#> Did you want `data = address`?
df3
#> # A tibble: 5 × 2
#>       x districts
#>   <int> <list>   
#> 1     1 <chr [3]>
#> 2     2 <chr [2]>
#> 3     3 <chr [2]>
#> 4     4 <chr [1]>
#> 5     5 <chr [3]>
df3$districts[[1]]
#> [1] "A"  "b"  "cc"

Created on 2022-04-14 by the reprex package (v2.0.0)

danlooo
  • 10,067
  • 2
  • 8
  • 22
  • Dear @danloo, thanks for your response. I edited my question and added a desired output. Do you think it is possible to produce it that way? Peace and thanks. – Akbar Ato Apr 14 '22 at 12:13
1

a data.table approach

library(data.table)
DT <- data.table(city, streets, district)
# create a lookup table with all elements
lookup <- melt(DT, measure.vars = names(DT))
# set df to data.table format
setDT(df)
final <- df[, .(address = unlist(tstrsplit(address, ",[ ]*", perl = TRUE))), by = .(x)]
# now add elements
final[lookup, type := i.variable, on = .(address = value)]
# and dcast to wide
dcast(final, x ~ type, value.var = "address")
#    x city streets district
# 1: 1    A      cc        b
# 2: 2    B      dd     <NA>
# 3: 3 <NA>      dd        a
# 4: 4    C    <NA>     <NA>
# 5: 5    D      cc        a
Wimpel
  • 26,031
  • 1
  • 20
  • 37
  • edited answer ;-) – Wimpel Apr 14 '22 at 12:24
  • yes... startpoint: the vignettes from data.table, and some tutorials you can find all over the internet. – Wimpel Apr 14 '22 at 12:33
  • I don't know why but in my case it produces 1 and 0 for found values. `streets` look like 1, 1, 1, 0, 1. – Akbar Ato Apr 14 '22 at 12:35
  • cannot reproduce the 0-1-1 results with the sample data you provided. Perhaps you have duplicates? Then the aggregate function in dcast defaults to `length` – Wimpel Apr 14 '22 at 12:40
  • In my original dataframe, city has 41 values, district 80, and streets 318. When `data.table` is used in the beginning, it shows some errors. That's the different length. – Akbar Ato Apr 14 '22 at 12:44
  • you should identify the origin of the problem, and then adjust your sample data to show the problem. Else, I/we cannor identify the problem. – Wimpel Apr 14 '22 at 12:50
1

If you are going to add a loop, it makes no sense to use case_when(); you don't have to add all options into it if you can loop over them.

You can solve it with a for-loop:

library(stringi)
 
df2 <- df
 
for(c in city) df2$city[stri_detect_fixed(df2$address, c)] <- c
 
for(d in district) df2$district[stri_detect_fixed(df2$address, d)] <- d
 
for(s in streets) df2$street[stri_detect_fixed(df2$address, s)] <- s

Note that your example code didn't work; the district names are 'a' and 'b' in your example dataset, but you generate names 'j' through 't'. I fixed that in my code above.

And it will cause an error if names of cities, districts and/or streets overlap. For instance, if one row is in the district 'b', and in the street 'cc', stri_detect_fixed will also see the 'c' and think it is in 'c'. I propose a completely different method to overcome this:

Alternative method

Given your example data, it makes most sense to first split the given address by ,, then look for exact matches with your reference city/district/street names. We can look for those exact matches with intersect().

# example reference address parts
cities <- c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", 
          "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", 
          "Z")

districts <- c("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k")

streets <- c("aa", "bb", "cc", "dd")

# example dataset
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:5), 
                 address = c("A, b, cc,", "B, dd", "a, dd", "C", "D, a, cc"))

# vectorize address into elements
address_elems = strsplit(df$address, ',') # split by comma
address_elems = sapply(address_elems, trimws) # trim whitespace

Compare df$address and the newly created address_elems:

> df$address
[1] "A, b, cc," "B, dd"     "a, dd"     "C"         "D, a, cc"

> address_elems
[[1]]
[1] "A"  "b"  "cc"
[[2]]
[1] "B"  "dd"
[[3]]
[1] "a"  "dd"
[[4]]
[1] "C"
[[5]]
[1] "D"  "a"  "cc"

We could find matching cities for just the first vector in address_elems in with intersect(cities, address_elems[[1]]).

Because we might get multiple matches, we only take the first element, with intersect(cities, address_elems[[1]])[[1]].

To apply this to every vector in address_elems, we can use sapply() or lapply():

# intersect the respective reference lists with each list of
# address items, taking only the first element
df$cities = sapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(cities, x)[1])

df$district = sapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(districts, x)[1])

df$street = sapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(streets, x)[1])

PIAT

Putting it all together we get:

# example reference address parts
cities <- c("A", "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", "H", "I", "J", "K", "L", 
          "M", "N", "O", "P", "Q", "R", "S", "T", "U", "V", "W", "X", "Y", 
          "Z")

districts <- c("a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "f", "g", "h", "i", "j", "k")

streets <- c("aa", "bb", "cc", "dd")

# example dataset
df <- data.frame(x = c(1:5), 
                 address = c("A, b, cc,", "B, dd", "a, dd", "C", "D, a, cc"))

# create vector of address elements
address_elems = strsplit(df$address, ',') # split by comma
address_elems = sapply(address_elems, trimws) # trim whitespace

# intersect the respecitve reference lists with each list of
# address items, take only the first element
df$cities = lapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(cities, x)[1])

df$district = sapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(districts, x)[1])

df$street = sapply(address_elems, function(x) intersect(streets, x)[1])

# cleanup
rm(address_elems)
Caspar V.
  • 1,782
  • 1
  • 3
  • 16