1

enter image description here

I need the output from that 2nd branch to be included as input to 1st branch's next step. Like multiple inheritance just check the diagram to get clear picture.

Viren Pawar
  • 31
  • 2
  • I would like to do same. Did you find an answer? Answer here https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54105792/parallel-states-merge-the-output-in-step-function says you can add output into input, which seems like that might work, but I have not explored further yet. – user1055568 May 07 '23 at 18:43

1 Answers1

0

You want indeed an inner parallel block to reconciliate the two branches.

Sorry for the bad quality of my drawing.

enter image description here

And in this specific context, it could also mean that the step should be outside of the parallel block, if you want to have one single parallel block.

Floh
  • 745
  • 3
  • 16
  • the scenario is in parallel block instead of 2 steps I have 5 out which 1 step has sub-steps inside the parallel block itself. I would like to know if we can pass output from 1 branch to another inside the parallel block itself. I need its output to be considered in one of the sub-steps. – Viren Pawar Apr 27 '22 at 05:36
  • At present the diagram that I have made lets say it is in production with that 1 arrow missing for which I have asked question. So the output from parallel branches is appended as an array and passed to last block. I would like to know is there any way that we can pass the o/p from right branch which has "End":True to contain "Next": "sub-step of 1st branch". – Viren Pawar Apr 27 '22 at 05:45
  • 1
    No, this does not work like this. What you are mentioning is indeed an inner parallel block inside the parallel block, what I draw. Because if one step (name it Foo) of branch A depends also on result of branch B, then indeed, it means that Foo is not in branch A but indeed is a child of A & B, so the step after the parallelism between A and B ends. – Floh Apr 27 '22 at 05:56