Note that this whole question assumes a nullable context as is the default in NET 6.
I want to write a method Read that takes in a nonnullable type (i.e. a struct or class) and outputs the nullable version of that struct or class. Something like this (obviously it wouldn't just return default but no need to complicate this):
public static T? Read<T>()
{
return default; //should return null
}
This example method should return null, and indeed it does for classes, nullable classes, and nullable valuetypes but not valuetypes:
Console.WriteLine(null == Read<string>()); //true
Console.WriteLine(null == Read<string?>()); //true
Console.WriteLine(null == Read<int>()); //false
Console.WriteLine(null == Read<int?>()); //true
I want a method that returns true for all of these cases. I've tried a whole host of constraints on T. I feel like the notnull constraint should work but it doesn't.
I could just make two methods, one constrained to struct (i.e. value types) and one constrained to class (i.e. nonnullable reference types). The following works:
public static T? ReadValue<T>() where T: struct
{
return null; //does return null
}
public static T? ReadRef<T>() where T: class
{
return null; //does return null
}
But, as you can see, these two methods would be identical sans the constraint and different names (which is needed because they have the same signature). So it seems silly that I would have to make two different methods for this.
For context: I know that the jankiness of this situation is in part caused by nullable value types being represented by Nullable<T> under the hood while nullable classes are just kept track of by the compiler. I just want to know if there is a way to avoid this.
