33

After I installed the SVN plugin in Eclipse and restarted it, a message appeared asking to install a connector. There are SVN Kit and Native JavaHL connectors. I am confused which one to install and why, can any one please guide me.

zb226
  • 9,586
  • 6
  • 49
  • 79
Mahmoud Saleh
  • 33,303
  • 119
  • 337
  • 498

1 Answers1

56

The two connectors should both work, here are the differences (more from experience by using them, not by reading their source code):

  • SVN Kit:
    • Works on all platforms, is a Java-only implementation (no need for DLLs or shared libraries).
    • Is a little bit slower than JavaHL Native.
    • Keeps its configuration at some other place than a real subversion client like TortoiseSVN (on windows). So if you need both, you have to keep that in mind.
  • JavaHL Native:
    • Needs a shared library (DLL), that has the same major version as the installed Subversion client. So if you use SVN command client 1.6.x, you should install / use the corresponding JavaHL version.
    • Is easy to use under Windows, more difficult to find the right version for Linux or Mac OS X (see Subclipse Wiki: JavaHL
    • Is faster and uses the same configuration as the installed SVN command client or TortoiseSVN client.

So you may install both, and switch between them under Windows > Preferences > Team > SVN > SVN Connector. I have used both and did not notice much difference in my normal word, only in special circumstances. If JavaHL fits in, it is the better connector in my opinion.

mliebelt
  • 15,345
  • 7
  • 55
  • 92
  • 1
    It seems that I am unable to install both SVN Kit 1.7 and JavaHL Native 1.7. Eclipse reports that it cannot do it. Any ideas or suggestions? – lit Jun 15 '15 at 20:29
  • How about discribe your problem in greater detail, perhaps as another question here? The world has changed, and perhaps we have to re-evaluate what are the rules now? – mliebelt Jul 04 '15 at 10:40