I'm trying to do the following:
Write a JET template that receives an object of type Class as argument. The object should represent a Java interface. The template generates a class that implements the interface, i.e. provides methods for all the method signatures it defines. The name of the generated class should be XImplementation where X is the name of the argument interface. The methods in the generated class do nothing or only return constant values: 0 for int and double, false for boolean, and null for reference types. You do not need to consider any other return types. E.g. for the following interface A, class AImplementation would be generated:
interface A { void m1(int x, int y); int m2(Object a); Object m3(); } class AImplementation implements A { public void m1(int p1, int p2) { } public int m2(Object p1) { return 0; } public Object m3() { return null; } }
Hint: the unqualified (simple) name of a type can be acquired by using the getSimpleName() method on the corresponding Class object.
I have read the tutorials about JET found on eclipse.org but I am still having trouble understanding what I need to do.
When I make the .txtjet file to be translated, am I trying to make it so the implementation of the .txtjet file writes a huge String with the code that I want to generate in the generate
method? Is that the right concept?
If that is the case I'm having trouble with one particular aspect. This is the JET template that I have come up with so far:
<%@ jet imports="java.lang.reflect.*" class="Q2Generator" %>
<%Object o = (Object) argument;%>
<%Class c = o.getClass();%>
public class <%=c.getName()%>Implementation implements <%=c.getName()%> {
<%for (Method m : c.getDeclaredMethods()) {%>
<% Class type = m.getReturnType();%>
<% if (!type.isPrimitive()) {%>
public <%=type.getSimpleName()%> <%=m.getName()%> { return null; } // this line is the problem
<% }%>
<%}%>
}
This template results in the following code in the generate
method:
public final String NL = nl == null ? (System.getProperties().getProperty("line.separator")) : nl;
protected final String TEXT_1 = NL + "public class ";
protected final String TEXT_2 = "Implementation implements ";
protected final String TEXT_3 = " {";
protected final String TEXT_4 = NL + "public ";
protected final String TEXT_5 = " ";
protected final String TEXT_6 = " { return null; }";
protected final String TEXT_7 = NL + "\t\t" + NL + "}";
protected final String TEXT_8 = NL;
public String generate(Object argument)
{
final StringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer();
Object o = (Object) argument;
Class c = o.getClass();
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_1);
stringBuffer.append(c.getName());
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_2);
stringBuffer.append(c.getName());
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_3);
for (Method m : c.getDeclaredMethods()) {
Class type = m.getReturnType();
if (!type.isPrimitive()) {
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_4);
stringBuffer.append(type.getSimpleName());
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_5);
stringBuffer.append(m.getName());
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_6);
}
}
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_7);
stringBuffer.append(TEXT_8);
return stringBuffer.toString();
}
Is there a way to indent the stringBuffer.append()
lines in the if statement? And is the String way the right way of going about this task?
Thanks.