Is goto ok for breaking out of nested loops?

Question

JavaScript supports a goto like syntax for breaking out of nested loops. It's not a great idea in general, but it's considered acceptable practice. C# does not directly support the break labelName syntax...but it does support the infamous goto.

I believe the equivalent can be achieved in C#:

    int i = 0;            
    while(i <= 10)
    {
        Debug.WriteLine(i);
        i++;
        for(int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
            if (i > 5)
            {
                goto Break;//break out of all loops
            }
    }

    Break:

By the same logic of JavaScript, is nested loop scenario an acceptable usage of goto? Otherwise, the only way I am aware to achieve this functionality is by setting a bool with appropriate scope.

Answer 1

My opinion: complex code flows with nested loops are hard to reason about; branching around, whether it is with goto or break, just makes it harder. Rather than writing the goto, I would first think really hard about whether there is a way to eliminate the nested loops.

A couple of useful techniques:

First technique: Refactor the inner loop to a method. Have the method return whether or not to break out of the outer loop. So:

for(outer blah blah blah)
{
    for(inner blah blah blah)
    {
        if (whatever)
        {
             goto leaveloop;      
        }
    }
}
leaveloop:    
...

becomes

for(outer blah blah blah)
{
    if (Inner(blah blah blah))
        break;
}

...

bool Inner(blah blah blah)
{
    for(inner blah blah blah)
    {
        if (whatever)
        {
             return true;      
        }
    }
    return false;
}

Second technique: if the loops do not have side effects, use LINQ.

// fulfill the first unfulfilled order over $100
foreach(var customer in customers)
{
    foreach(var order in customer.Orders)
    {
        if (!order.Filled && order.Total >= 100.00m)
        {
             Fill(order);
             goto leaveloop;      
        }
    }
}
leaveloop:    

instead, write:

var orders = from customer in customers
             from order in customer.Orders;
             where !order.Filled
             where order.Total >= 100.00m
             select order;
var orderToFill = orders.FirstOrDefault();
if (orderToFill != null) Fill(orderToFill);

No loops, so no breaking out required.

Alternatively, as configurator points out in a comment, you could write the code in this form:

var orderToFill = customers
    .SelectMany(customer=>customer.Orders)
    .Where(order=>!order.Filled)
    .Where(order=>order.Total >= 100.00m)
    .FirstOrDefault();
if (orderToFill != null) Fill(orderToFill);

The moral of the story: loops emphasize control flow at the expense of business logic. Rather than trying to pile more and more complex control flow on top of each other, try refactoring the code so that the business logic is clear.

Answer 2

I would personally try to avoid using goto here by simply putting the loop into a different method - while you can't easily break out of a particular level of loop, you can easily return from a method at any point.

In my experience this approach has usually led to simpler and more readable code with shorter methods (doing one particular job) in general.

Answer 3

Let's get one thing straight: there is nothing fundamentally wrong with using the goto statement, it isn't evil - it is just one more tool in the toolbox. It is how you use it that really matters, and it is easily misused.

Breaking out of a nested loop of some description can be a valid use of the statement, although you should first look to see if it can be redesigned. Can your loop exit expressions be rewritten? Are you using the appropriate type of loop? Can you filter the list of data you may be iterating over so that you don't need to exit early? Should you refactor some loop code into a separate function?

Answer 4

IMO it is acceptable in languages that do not support break n; where n specifies the number of loops it should break out.
At least it's much more readable than setting a variable that is then checked in the outer loop.

Answer 5

I believe the 'goto' is acceptable in this situation. C# does not support any nifty ways to break out of nested loops unfortunately.

Answer 6

It's a bit of a unacceptable practice in C#. If there's no way your design can avoid it, well, gotta use it. But do exhaust all other alternatives first. It will make for better readability and maintainability. For your example, I've crafted one such potential refactoring:

void Original()
{
    int i = 0;            
    while(i <= 10)
    {
        Debug.WriteLine(i);
        i++;
        if (Process(i))
        {
            break;
        }
    }
}

bool Process(int i)
{
    for(int j = 0; j < 3; j++)
        if (i > 5)
        {
            return true;
        }
    return false;
}

Answer 7

anonymous functions

You can almost always bust out the inner loop to an anonymous function or lambda. Here you can see where the function used to be an inner loop, where I would have had to use GoTo.

private void CopyFormPropertiesAndValues()
{
    MergeOperationsContext context = new MergeOperationsContext() { GroupRoot = _groupRoot, FormMerged = MergedItem };
    // set up filter functions caller
    var CheckFilters = (string key, string value) =>
    {
        foreach (var FieldFilter in MergeOperationsFieldFilters)
        {
            if (!FieldFilter(key, value, context))
                return false;
        }
        return true;
    };
    // Copy values from form to FormMerged 
    foreach (var key in _form.ValueList.Keys)
    {
        var MyValue = _form.ValueList(key);
        if (CheckFilters(key, MyValue))
            MergedItem.ValueList(key) = MyValue;
    }
}

This often occurs when searching for multiple items in a dataset manually, as well. Sad to say the proper use of goto is better than Booleans/flags, from a clarity standpoint, but this is more clear than either and avoids the taunts of your co-workers.

For high-performance situations, a goto would be fitting, however, but only by 1%, let's be honest here...

Answer 8

I recommend using continue if you want to skip that one item, and break if you want to exit the loop. For deeper nested put it in a method and use return. I personally would rather use a status bool than a goto. Rather use goto as a last resort.

Answer 9

int i = 0;                 
while(i <= 10)     
{         
    Debug.WriteLine(i);         
    i++;         
    for(int j = 0; j < 3 && i <= 5; j++)             
    {
        //Whatever you want to do
    }
 }      

Answer 10

Unacceptable in C#.

Just wrap the loop in a function and use return.

EDIT: On SO, downvoting is used to on incorrect answers, and not on answers you disagree with. As the OP explicitly asked "is it acceptable?", answering "unacceptable" is not incorrect (although you might disagree).