First difference:
An interesting example of a different behaviour between strtr
and str_replace
is in the comments section of the PHP Manual:
<?php
$arrFrom = array("1","2","3","B");
$arrTo = array("A","B","C","D");
$word = "ZBB2";
echo str_replace($arrFrom, $arrTo, $word);
?>
- I would expect as result: "ZDDB"
- However, this return: "ZDDD"
(Because B = D according to our array)
To make this work, use "strtr" instead:
<?php
$arr = array("1" => "A","2" => "B","3" => "C","B" => "D");
$word = "ZBB2";
echo strtr($word,$arr);
?>
This means that str_replace
is a more global approach to replacements, while strtr
simply translates the chars one by one.
Another difference:
Given the following code (taken from PHP String Replacement Speed Comparison):
<?php
$text = "PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor";
$text_strtr = strtr($text
, array("PHP" => "PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor"
, "PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor" => "PHP"));
$text_str_replace = str_replace(array("PHP", "PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor")
, array("PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor", "PHP")
, $text);
var_dump($text_strtr);
var_dump($text_str_replace);
?>
The resulting lines of text will be:
string(3) "PHP"
string(27) "PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor"
The main explanation:
This happens because:
strtr: it sorts its parameters by length, in descending order, so:
- it will give "more importance" to the largest one, and then, as the subject text is itself the largest key of the replacement array, it gets translated.
- because all the chars of the subject text have been replaced, the process ends there.
str_replace: it works in the order the keys are defined, so:
- it finds the key “PHP” in the subject text and replaces it with: “PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor”, what gives as result:
“PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor: Hypertext Preprocessor”.
then it finds the next key: “PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor” in the resulting text of the former step, so it gets replaced by "PHP", which gives as result:
“PHP: Hypertext Preprocessor”.
there are no more keys to look for, so the replacement ends there.