32

I am looking for a way to generate pseudo random number sequences that will yield identical sequence results for a given seed across any platform. I am assuming that rand() / srand() is not going to be consistent (I could easily be wrong about this assumption).

Craig McQueen
  • 41,871
  • 30
  • 130
  • 181
toastie
  • 1,934
  • 3
  • 22
  • 35
  • 2
    see my question and answer for C++11 random generators. The C++11 mt19937 delivers consistent results across all platforms, but the standard distributions do not, so I created my own distributions: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34903356/c11-random-number-distributions-are-not-consistent-across-platforms-what-al – Arno Duvenhage Jan 23 '16 at 11:46
  • If you choose to use linear congruential generators, [this wikipedia page](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linear_congruential_generator#Parameters_in_common_use) is useful. In particular you could use the C implementation of `rand` suggested in the ISO/IEC 9899. In my tests it gave identical results when `unsigned long` is using 32 (the minimum) or 64 bits. – Gabriel Devillers Aug 21 '19 at 17:08

5 Answers5

19

Something like a Mersenne Twister (from Boost.Random) is deterministic.

rlbond
  • 65,341
  • 56
  • 178
  • 228
  • 1
    If you'd rather avoid Boost, you can use the original implementation of the [Mersenne Twister](http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt.html), which was written in straight C. In recent years, the MT group has added some additional ports that can make use of SIMD, OpenCL, and CUDA. – sfstewman Mar 19 '13 at 18:19
  • 3
    see my question and answer for C++11 random generators. The C++11 mt19937 delivers consistent results across all platforms, but the standard distributions do not, so I created my own distributions: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34903356/c11-random-number-distributions-are-not-consistent-across-platforms-what-al – Arno Duvenhage Jan 23 '16 at 11:43
8

Knuth has released into the public domain C (and FORTRAN) source code for the pseudo-random number generator described in section 3.6 of The Art of Computer Programming.

las3rjock
  • 8,612
  • 1
  • 31
  • 33
6

I realize this is an old thread but now with C++11 there are a whole bunch of new options available. Here is a distilled example from the page which defaults to using the Mersenne Twister engine and Normal distribution:

#include <iostream>
#include <iomanip>
#include <string>
#include <map>
#include <random>

int main()
{
    std::random_device rd;

    //
    // Engines 
    //
    std::mt19937 e2(rd());
    //std::knuth_b e2(rd());
    //std::default_random_engine e2(rd()) ;

    //
    // Distribtuions
    //
    std::normal_distribution<> dist(2, 2);
    //std::student_t_distribution<> dist(5);
    //std::poisson_distribution<> dist(2);
    //std::extreme_value_distribution<> dist(0,2);

    std::map<int, int> hist;
    for (int n = 0; n < 10000; ++n) {
        ++hist[std::round(dist(e2))];
    }

    for (auto p : hist) {
        std::cout << std::fixed << std::setprecision(1) << std::setw(2)
                  << p.first << ' ' << std::string(p.second/200, '*') << '\n';
    }
}
Shafik Yaghmour
  • 154,301
  • 39
  • 440
  • 740
  • 8
    The distributions specified by the C++11 standard are **not** required to yield reproducible results given the same seed, even when using the same code. Let alone using different libraries, like libc++ vs libstdc++. – OmnipotentEntity Oct 27 '14 at 18:21
  • 2
    see my question and answer for C++11 random generators. The C++11 mt19937 delivers consistent results across all platforms, but the standard distributions do not, so I created my own distributions: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34903356/c11-random-number-distributions-are-not-consistent-across-platforms-what-al – Arno Duvenhage Jan 23 '16 at 11:45
1

I've been working on a simplerandom library for this. It is supposed to be cross-platform, and I also aim to target multiple languages. Currently it supports C and Python (same numbers generated in both languages). I plan to implement the same generators in C++ soon, following the Boost and C++11 random API.

Craig McQueen
  • 41,871
  • 30
  • 130
  • 181
0

A quickly googled reference says:

Two different initializations with the same seed, instructs the pseudo-random generator to generate the same succession of results for the subsequent calls to rand in both cases.

But the question remains. I assume the above spec only applies to RNGs within the same process. It most likely doesn't specify anything about cross-platform or cross-compiler things. Your best bet is probably to find a library that is available for all desired platforms. Then you should be reasonably safe that if seeded with the same value they return the same sequence of numbers.

n3rd
  • 5,989
  • 4
  • 39
  • 56
  • I believe this refers to he behavior of any particular implementation of `rand()`, and does not provide any cross-compiler or cross-platform assurance. Moreover, with built-in PRNGs you risk all kinds of unwanted properties. Use a library with a PRNG known to be appropriate for your needs. – dmckee --- ex-moderator kitten May 28 '09 at 19:00