9

Possible Duplicate:
ruby-debug with Ruby 1.9.3?

I had heard rumors that ruby 1.9.3p125 has a solution for the ruby-debug19 problem, so per instructions on the RVM site, I reinstalled 1.9.3:

$ rvm reinstall 1.9.3 --patch debug --force-autoconf
$ ruby -v
  ruby 1.9.3p125 (2012-02-16 revision 34643) [x86_64-darwin11.2.0]

Then:

gem install ruby-debug19

Added this entry to my Gemfile:

gem 'ruby-debug19'

Then:

$ rails server -u         
=> Booting WEBrick
=> Rails 3.1.3 application starting in development on http://0.0.0.0:3000
=> Call with -d to detach
=> Ctrl-C to shutdown server
You need to install ruby-debug to run the server in debugging mode. With gems, use 'gem install ruby-debug'
Exiting

To get past this error I changed my Gemfile entry to:

gem 'ruby-debug19', :require => 'ruby-debug'

Now a new error from the server:

/Users/don/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/activesupport-3.1.3/lib/active_support/dependencies.rb:240:in `require': dlopen(/Users/don/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/ruby-debug-base19-0.11.25/lib/ruby_debug.bundle, 9): Symbol not found: _ruby_threadptr_data_type (LoadError)
  Referenced from: /Users/don/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/ruby-debug-base19-0.11.25/lib/ruby_debug.bundle
  Expected in: flat namespace
 in /Users/don/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/ruby-debug-base19-0.11.25/lib/ruby_debug.bundle - /Users/don/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.3-p125/gems/ruby-debug-base19-0.11.25/lib/ruby_debug.bundle

I'm very confused by the hundreds of posts out there on how to handle this ruby-debug19 issue. I was hoping it had been solved. Apparently not. Any suggestions? (If anyone suggests a patch, please provide step by step instructions on how to apply it. I've struggled with patches in the past.)

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Don Leatham
  • 2,694
  • 4
  • 29
  • 41

5 Answers5

36

A fork of ruby-debug just called 'debugger' now exists that incorporates many of the fixes people had been deploying on top of ruby-debug19, so you should be able to just change your Gemfile to

gem 'debugger'

... and off you go.

tjgrathwell
  • 487
  • 3
  • 10
3

Long story short: it's not resolved, and official resolution will only come with a new version of ruby-debug19 or ruby-debug-base19. It's pretty aggravating, I know.

I've done a lot of digging on this, too, and I've kept an eye on things since 1.9.3 came out (because we'd love-love-love to use it in production). However, sadly, 1.9.3-p125 doesn't have a fix for ruby-debug. Only ruby-debug19 will have the fix for ruby-debug19, as the authors of ruby-debug19 and ruby-debug-base19 have been working on a patch and have an updated test build working on Ruby 1.9.3… but they haven't released it to the general public. ruby-debug-base19 hasn't seen a release in eons; ruby-debug19 even longer (since '09).

If you're on rvm head, you should be able to install 1.9.3-p125 with the added "falcon patch" found here (and noted about RVM here. This gist seems to have better instructions (it's a newer fork of the older one).

Ben Kreeger
  • 6,355
  • 2
  • 38
  • 53
  • I tried the falcon patch using rvm - still get a symbol error: Symbol not found: _ruby_current_thread (LoadError) :-( – Don Leatham Mar 02 '12 at 22:28
3

The best thing to do is just use pry. Its an irb-like replacement for ruby-debug and it works with all version of Ruby with no nasty patching!

https://github.com/pry/pry

TheDelChop
  • 7,938
  • 4
  • 48
  • 70
  • I know Pry is good for viewing program state, but does it let you follow through stack trace and code path? I've looked through the docs but couldn't find much of anything on it. **EDIT**: found [pry-debug](https://github.com/Mon-Ouie/pry_debug) — I need to give that a shot. – Ben Kreeger Feb 29 '12 at 15:38
  • Scratch that; that wasn't what I was looking for with regards to pry. Instead, [pry-nav](http://github.com/nixme/pry-nav) looks like the ticket. – Ben Kreeger Feb 29 '12 at 19:02
  • pry is indeed a great tool. I've been using it as a stop-gap, but I really need "step", "next" and "continue" functionality. Benjamin - pry-nav looks very, very new. I tried using it when it was first posted, but couldn't get it to work consistently. Is it working for you? – Don Leatham Mar 02 '12 at 22:37
  • It is, as a matter of fact. `next` doesn't QUITE work exactly the same as it does in `ruby-debug`, but it's a suitable, great-looking replacement so far. It's matured quite a bit. – Ben Kreeger Mar 04 '12 at 14:56
0

I've been having similar problems using Rails 3.2 with Ruby 1.9.3p0 debugging in Aptana.
For me, new ruby-debug-base193 does not compile. But what works fine is a fix that has been posted elsewhere:

Gemfile:
gem 'ruby-debug-ide19'
gem 'ruby-debug-base19'

And then providing the missing is_binary_data? method somewhere. I put it in my Rails application.rb file like so:

class String
  def is_binary_data?
    ( self.count( "^ -~", "^\r\n" ).fdiv(self.size) > 0.3 || self.index( "\x00" ) ) unless empty?
  end
end
Peter Abramowitsch
  • 11
  • 1
0

You must pass the --with-ruby-include and point it at your src directory for this to work.

(most of these answers elsewhere on SO have gone stale since 1.9.3-p125.)

I've written up new instructions here for ubuntu 11.10 that work on my machine, but give them a try on darwin and see if they help?: https://gist.github.com/2218661

Larry Kyrala
  • 889
  • 2
  • 8
  • 18