81

I'm using rails ransack ( https://github.com/ernie/ransack ) to allow the users to filter and sort some records. I get the filtered and sorted records using traditional methods.

 @invoices = Invoice.search(params[:q]).result

Now I would like to get some summary information so I have

 @invoices = Invoice.search(params[:q]).result
 @summary = @invoices.select("sum(balance) as balance_total").first

Except when the user specifies a field to sort. I get the SQL error:

 Column "project_name" is invalid in the ORDER BY clause because 
 it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause

Can I remove the sort from the scope? How?

Thanks

jrhicks
  • 14,759
  • 9
  • 42
  • 57
  • hmmm now ransack isn't liking the select on the result set, not sure it worked without the sort issue anymore. – jrhicks Feb 28 '12 at 23:57

2 Answers2

195

You can call the reorder method with an empty string. E.g.:

Article.order('headline asc').to_sql
#=> "SELECT `articles`.* FROM `articles`  ORDER BY headline asc"

Article.order('headline asc').reorder('').to_sql
#=> "SELECT `articles`.* FROM `articles`"
Joshua Pinter
  • 45,245
  • 23
  • 243
  • 245
Mori
  • 27,279
  • 10
  • 68
  • 73
-2

You can also use the unscoped class method in Rails 3:

class Post < ActiveRecord::Base
  default_scope :published => true
end

posts = Post.all #=> SELECT * FROM posts WHERE published = true

posts = Post.unscoped do
  Post.all #=> SELECT * FROM posts
end

In Rails 2 it was called with_exclusive_scope.

See https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/bd1666ad1de88598ed6f04ceffb8488a77be4385

Chris Bloom
  • 3,526
  • 1
  • 33
  • 47
  • 30
    A word of warning to people using `unscoped`: It does more than just reset the order! If you are using it in a chained ActiveRecord query, it will effectively remove the prior constraints from consideration. For example, `Posts.first.comments.unscoped` will return ALL Comment's, not just those associated with the first Post. – Drew Dara-Abrams Sep 12 '13 at 20:34