Suppose a vector with values [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. How can I create a vector that refers to not necessarily contiguous values, e.g. [3,4,7,9], i.e. given by some index, by using STL.
Asked
Active
Viewed 1,825 times
4
-
Uncannily similar to http://stackoverflow.com/questions/9705441 but non-sequential. – Flexo Mar 14 '12 at 16:36
-
can you apply the same solution? The question just popped from that. would you still say that if I would ask in 2 days time? – Mar 14 '12 at 16:37
-
Similar, but also different enough to require a different solution. – juanchopanza Mar 14 '12 at 16:39
-
1@g24l so you want an imaginary/equivalent function like/to `std::vector
::insert_offsets (original_vector, {3, 4, 7, 9})`? Where the second parameter is the offsets you wan't your new vector to contain. there is nothing regarding the values that is to be taken into account? – Filip Roséen - refp Mar 14 '12 at 16:43 -
I fail to understand the downvote though... dah ... – Mar 14 '12 at 16:54
1 Answers
4
You can express this as a transformation, e.g.:
#include <valarray>
#include <iostream>
#include <iterator>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
template <typename T>
void pick(std::vector<T>& result, const std::vector<T>& in, const std::vector<typename std::vector<T>::size_type>& s) {
result.reserve(s.size());
std::transform(s.begin(), s.end(), std::back_inserter(result),
[&in](typename std::vector<T>::size_type idx) {
return in.at(idx);
});
}
int main() {
const std::vector<int> arr={0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10};
std::vector<int> result;
pick(result, arr, {3,4,7,9});
}
I used a lambda, but you can also use std::bind
or the (now deprecated) std::bind2nd
for this.
The example with C++11's std::bind
makes pick
:
template <typename T>
void pick(std::vector<T>& result, const std::vector<T>& in, const std::vector<typename std::vector<T>::size_type>& s) {
result.reserve(s.size());
std::transform(s.begin(), s.end(), std::back_inserter(result),
std::bind(static_cast<const T& (std::vector<T>::*)(typename std::vector<T>::size_type) const>(&std::vector<T>::at), in, std::placeholders::_1));
}
It's seriously ugly though because of the need to cast the member function pointer to resolve the overload of at
(const vs non-const versions).
-
1yes , I was thinking `std::bind2nd` also, but `std::transform` is very nice. Beautiful solution! – Mar 14 '12 at 16:46
-
-
@g24l I'm currently in a very boring meeting (where I shouldn't be), if interested I could write you a much nicer solution in a bit. – Filip Roséen - refp Mar 14 '12 at 16:55
-
-
@g24l just to make things clear; the offsets are **not** known at compile-time, right? – Filip Roséen - refp Mar 14 '12 at 16:57
-
@refp - I'd be curious to see that. I don't see how it's possible to write a cleaner solution without writing a for loop out by hand which I assume is what the OP meant when they said *"using STL"*. For the record in real code I've either used a type that support arbitrary slicing (not just taking a slice with a constant stride) or written it out the long way. – Flexo Mar 14 '12 at 16:58
-
@refp : I would suppose not. I don't see much utility to it, although there are cases that you would want to. – Mar 17 '12 at 08:24