Questions tagged [idisposable]

IDisposable is an interface within the Microsoft .NET Framework's Base Class Library (BCL). It is intended to provide a generic, deterministic method of releasing unmanaged resources within .NET application code.

Purpose

IDisposable is an interface within the Microsoft .NET Framework's Base Class Library (BCL). It is intended to provide a generic, deterministic method of releasing unmanaged resources within .NET application code.

Unmanaged Resources

A managed resource is any object in memory that, in its entirety, can be monitored and released by the .NET garbage collector when they are no longer needed. The vast majority of types available within the .NET libraries (as well as user-defined types) represent managed resources. Because these are managed resources, it is not necessary to release the memory that these objects require; once they are no longer in use, the .NET garbage collector will periodically "collect" these objects and free this memory for other uses.

An unmanaged resource is any resource (typically something existing outside of the application runtime, such as a file handle or database connection) which is not--and cannot be--monitored and released by the .NET runtime garbage collector. Typical examples of unmanaged resources are network connections, file handles, and Windows GDI graphics handles. All of these resources, while represented in .NET code by a traditional object, are outside of the reach of the .NET garbage collector, as the procedure for obtaining and releasing such resources are specific to the type of resource, and all require calls into unmanaged code.

IDisposable

IDisposable is an interface within the BCL that defines a single parameterless, non-returning function called Dispose. A type that implements this interface indicates to the developer that, at some level of encapsulation, this type utilizes an unmanaged resource of some kind. In this case, the developer is required to call Dispose on the instance once it is no longer needed. The underlying type's implementation of Dispose should then perform whatever actions are necessary to release the resource, including calling unmanaged code.

Use Cases

There are two* (by design) cases in which a type should implement IDisposable:

  1. The type interacts directly with an unmanaged resource (it calls an unmanaged or external function to acquire a resource, and another unmanaged or external function to release it).
  2. The type makes use of an unmanaged resource indirectly through other types that implement IDisposable. In other words, the type makes use of an unmanaged resource that is not managed by another instance and exists beyond the lifetime of a single function call.

In the first case, the use is obvious: the type makes use of the resource directly, so it must acquire and release the resource directly. In the second case, the type makes use of other IDisposable types and must be told when it is safe to call Dispose on those resources.

*A type may also implement IDisposable in order to take advantage of the using language constructs within VB.NET and C#, but this choice is generally made for aesthetic or idiomatic reasons, not out of technical applicability, so those cases fall outside the scope of this article.

Implementation

Depending on the reason that a type implements the IDisposable interface, the implementation may vary slightly. There are, in general, two forms of implementation of IDisposable:

  1. Simple, strict implementation of the interface (a single Dispose function)
  2. Finalizer-compatible implementation (two versions of Dispose)

Simple

If the type falls into the second use-case outlined above (indirect use of an unmanaged resource purely by encapsulation), then the first implementation should be used. An example appears below:

public class WidgetFile : IDisposable
{
    private FileStream fileStream;

    public WidgetFile(string fileName)
    {
        fileStream = new FileStream(fileName, FileMode.Open);
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        fileStream.Dispose();
    }
}

In this case, the WidgetFile encapsulates an IDisposable type, System.IO.FileStream. Since the type (and its parent type(s)) only indirectly interact with an unmanaged resource, the simple implementation is both adequate and preferred.

Finalizer-Based

If, however, the type (or one of its parent types) interacts directly with an unmanaged resource, then a more defensive, finalizer-based approach is required:

[DllImport("Widget.dll")]
private static extern IntPtr GetGadgetHandle(string fileName);
[DllImport("Widget.dll")]
private static extern void ReleaseGadgetHandle(IntPtr handle);

public class SuperWidgetFile : IDisposable
{
    private IntPtr handle;
    private WidgetFile file;

    public SuperWidgetFile(string fileName)
    {
        handle = GetGadgetHandle(fileName);
        file = new WidgetFile(fileName);
    }

    public void Dispose()
    {
        Dispose(true);
    }

    ~SuperWidgetFile()
    {
        Dispose(false);
    }

    protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing)
    {
        if(disposing)
        {
            file.Dispose();
            GC.SuppressFinalize(this);
        }

        if(handle != IntPtr.Zero)
        {
            ReleaseGadgetHandle(handle);
            handle = IntPtr.Zero;
        }
    }
}

This implementation is obviously more complex than the simple, strict interface implementation. This is because, while a conscientious developer will always call Dispose on an instance of an IDisposable type when it is no longer needed, mistakes do happen and there is the possibility that the object may be unused but not have Dispose called. In this case, the instance itself (since it is a managed resource) will be collected by the garbage collector, while the unmanaged resource it refers to will never be released explicitly.

However, the garbage collector provides the ability to write code that executes before an object is collected and destroyed, called a "finalizer". The function defined as ~SuperWidgetFile() is the finalizer for the SuperWidgetFile type.

When using this approach, the implementing class must:

  1. Provide a protected virtual void Dispose(bool disposing) function
  2. Implement the interface and provide a Dispose() function, which calls Dispose(true)
  3. Create a finalizer which calls Dispose(false)

The boolean disposing parameter is designed to designate the source of the function call. If it came from an explicit disposal (the desired path), then it should evaluate to true. If it came from the finalizer, then it should evaluate to false. This is because, as we have done, all IDisposable types that interact with unmanaged resources directly must use the finalizer approach, and these objects may have been collected already. Because of this, the type should only perform the release of its own unmanaged resources within the finalizer.

If the object is disposed explicitly (disposing == true), the type calls GC.SuppressFinalize(this), which tells the garbage collector that this object's finalizer does not need to be called when it is collected.

Common Questions

Q: Are IDisposable types "special"? Does the .NET runtime or garbage collector treat them differently by automatically calling Dispose, collecting them early, etc.?

A: NO. Fundamentally, IDiposable is just an interface, no different from any other interface defined in the .NET libraries or in user code. At runtime, objects implementing IDisposable follow exactly the same rules for collection as all other objects. The only "special treatment" afforded IDisposable types exist at the language level, where language shorthand allow for greater ease in remembering to call Dispose, such as within the using constructs in VB.NET and C#. Again, these are language features only. They do not have any impact on runtime behavior.

Q: Do I always need to call Dispose?

A: YES. While you may have personal knowledge of a particular type and what it actually does when Dispose is called, there should be a very clear, well-defined, and unavoidable reason to avoid calling Dispose when an object is no longer in use. The absolute easiest method of ensuring that you properly dispose of your disposable objects is to enclose them in using blocks:

using(SuperWidgetFile file = new SuperWidgetFile(@"C:\widget.wgt"))
{
    // widget code
}

However, this construct only works when the lifetime of the instance begins and ends within a single function call; in other cases, you will have to ensure that you call Dispose explicitly.

1420 questions
1869
votes
20 answers

Proper use of the IDisposable interface

I know from reading Microsoft documentation that the "primary" use of the IDisposable interface is to clean up unmanaged resources. To me, "unmanaged" means things like database connections, sockets, window handles, etc. But, I've seen code where…
cwick
  • 26,132
  • 12
  • 37
  • 40
415
votes
13 answers

Use of Finalize/Dispose method in C#

C# 2008 I have been working on this for a while now, and I am still confused about the use of finalize and dispose methods in code. My questions are below: I know that we only need a finalizer while disposing unmanaged resources. However, if there…
ant2009
  • 27,094
  • 154
  • 411
  • 609
412
votes
12 answers

Do HttpClient and HttpClientHandler have to be disposed between requests?

System.Net.Http.HttpClient and System.Net.Http.HttpClientHandler in .NET Framework 4.5 implement IDisposable (via System.Net.Http.HttpMessageInvoker). The using statement documentation says: As a rule, when you use an IDisposable object, you should…
Fernando Correia
  • 21,803
  • 13
  • 83
  • 116
374
votes
5 answers

When should I use GC.SuppressFinalize()?

In .NET, under which circumstances should I use GC.SuppressFinalize()? What advantage(s) does using this method give me?
Sam Saffron
  • 128,308
  • 78
  • 326
  • 506
225
votes
7 answers

returning in the middle of a using block

Something like: using (IDisposable disposable = GetSomeDisposable()) { //..... //...... return Stg(); } I believe it is not a proper place for a return statement, is it?
tafa
  • 7,146
  • 3
  • 36
  • 40
216
votes
12 answers

Should I Dispose() DataSet and DataTable?

DataSet and DataTable both implement IDisposable, so, by conventional best practices, I should call their Dispose() methods. However, from what I've read so far, DataSet and DataTable don't actually have any unmanaged resources, so Dispose() doesn't…
mbeckish
  • 10,485
  • 5
  • 30
  • 55
200
votes
5 answers

Will Dispose() be called in a using statement with a null object?

Is it safe to use the using statement on a (potentially) null object? Consider the following example: class Test { IDisposable GetObject(string name) { // returns null if not found } void DoSomething() { using…
Paolo Tedesco
  • 55,237
  • 33
  • 144
  • 193
196
votes
7 answers

Should I call Close() or Dispose() for stream objects?

Classes such as Stream, StreamReader, StreamWriter etc implements IDisposable interface. That means, we can call Dispose() method on objects of these classes. They've also defined a public method called Close(). Now that confuses me, as to what…
Nawaz
  • 353,942
  • 115
  • 666
  • 851
189
votes
2 answers

What is the difference between using and await using? And how can I decide which one to use?

I've noticed that in some case, Visual Studio recommends to do this await using var disposable = new Disposable(); // Do something Instead of this using var disposable = new Disposable(); // Do something What is the difference between using and…
Justin Lessard
  • 10,804
  • 5
  • 49
  • 61
148
votes
9 answers

Will the Garbage Collector call IDisposable.Dispose for me?

The .NET IDisposable Pattern implies that if you write a finalizer, and implement IDisposable, that your finalizer needs to explicitly call Dispose. This is logical, and is what I've always done in the rare situations where a finalizer is…
Orion Edwards
  • 121,657
  • 64
  • 239
  • 328
141
votes
7 answers

How do you prevent IDisposable from spreading to all your classes?

Start with these simple classes... Let's say I have a simple set of classes like this: class Bus { Driver busDriver = new Driver(); } class Driver { Shoe[] shoes = { new Shoe(), new Shoe() }; } class Shoe { Shoelace lace = new…
GrahamS
  • 9,980
  • 9
  • 49
  • 63
124
votes
5 answers

What happens if i return before the end of using statement? Will the dispose be called?

I've the following code using(MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream()) { //code return 0; } The dispose() method is called at the end of using statement braces } right? Since I return before the end of the using statement, will the…
NLV
  • 21,141
  • 40
  • 118
  • 183
102
votes
1 answer

When are .NET Core dependency injected instances disposed?

ASP.NET Core uses extension methods on IServiceCollection to set up dependency injection, then when a type is needed it uses the appropriate method to create a new instance: AddTransient - adds a type that is created again each time it's…
Keith
  • 150,284
  • 78
  • 298
  • 434
100
votes
8 answers

How does one tell if an IDisposable object reference is disposed?

Is there a method, or some other light-weight way, to check if a reference is to a disposed object? P.S. - This is just a curiousity (sleep well, not in production code). Yes, I know I can catch the ObjectDisposedException upon trying to access a…
Neil C. Obremski
  • 18,696
  • 24
  • 83
  • 112
84
votes
2 answers

ASP MVC: When is IController Dispose() called?

I'm going through a big refactoring / speed tweaking of one of my larger MVC apps. It has been deployed to production for a few months now, and I was starting to get timeouts waiting for connections in the connection pool. I have tracked the issue…
John Gietzen
  • 48,783
  • 32
  • 145
  • 190
1
2 3
94 95