What are the best practices to consider when catching exceptions and re-throwing them? I want to make sure that the Exception object's InnerException and stack trace are preserved. Is there a difference between the following code blocks in the way…
Will the following append() in the catch cause the rethrown exception to see the effect of append() being called?
try {
mayThrowMyErr();
} catch (myErr &err) {
err.append("Add to my message here");
throw; // Does the rethrow exception reflect…
After searching for some references to figure it out, -unfortunately- I could not find useful -and simple- description about understanding the differences between throws and rethrows. It is kind of confusing when try to understand how we should use…
I'm learning to use python. I just came across this article:
http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/200711/rethrowing_exceptions_in_python.html
It describes rethrowing exceptions in python, like this:
try:
do_something_dangerous()
except:
…
I rethrow an exception with "throw;", but the stacktrace is incorrect:
static void Main(string[] args) {
try {
try {
throw new Exception("Test"); //Line 12
}
catch (Exception ex) {
throw; //Line…
Consider the following C++ code:
try {
throw foo(1);
} catch (foo &err) {
throw bar(2);
} catch (bar &err) {
// Will throw of bar(2) be caught here?
}
I would expect the answer is no since it is not inside the try block and I see in another…
I thought throwing an exception is good practice to let it bubble back up to the UI or somewhere where you log the exception and notify the user about it.
Why does resharper say it is redundant?
try
{
File.Open("FileNotFound.txt",…
In my onCreate() I set an UncaughtException handler as follows:
Thread.setDefaultUncaughtExceptionHandler(new Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler() {
@Override
public void uncaughtException(Thread thread, Throwable throwable) {
…
refering to a lot of documentation on the net, particularly on SO, eg : What is the proper way to re-throw an exception in C#?
there should be a difference between "throw e;" and "throw;".
But, from :…
I am trying to create a helper method that will eliminate the need of having code like this:
void foo() throws ExceptionA, ExceptionB, DefaultException {
try {
doSomething(); // that throws ExceptionA, ExceptionB or others
} catch…
I have a wrapper responsible for logging operations, named OperationWrapper. Its structure is simple and as follows:
public void runOperation(Operation o) throws Exception{
logOperationStarted();
o.execute();
…
When running the following code, I see the memory consumption of the process grow. Is there a memory leak in my code, is there a memory leak in the std implementation, or is it intended behaviour? It's running on a Windows 10 machine; both Visual…
try {
// code which throws exception.
} catch (SQLException sqlex) {
logger.error("Custom message", sqlex);
**throw new CustomApplicationException("Custom message", sqlex);**
}
In the above example, on the bold line, I am getting PMD…
The more precise rethrow allows to write code that throws the exception really thrown :
public void foo(String bar) throws FirstException, SecondException {
try{
// Code that may throw both FirstException and SecondException
}
…
I'm very uncertain about this two topics. I know that i should use multi-catch for exceptions which need to handle the same way. But for what purpose do i really need something like that.
private void something(String name) throws IOException,…