In dynamical systems theory, a period-doubling bifurcation occurs when a slight change in a system's parameters causes a new periodic trajectory to emerge from an existing periodic trajectory—the new one having double the period of the original. With the doubled period, it takes twice as long (or, in a discrete dynamical system, twice as many iterations) for the numerical values visited by the system to repeat themselves.

A period-halving bifurcation occurs when a system switches to a new behavior with half the period of the original system.

A period-doubling cascade is an infinite sequence of period-doubling bifurcations. Such cascades are a common route by which dynamical systems develop chaos.[1] In hydrodynamics, they are one of the possible routes to turbulence.[2]

Period-halving bifurcations (L) leading to order, followed by period-doubling bifurcations (R) leading to chaos.

Examples

Bifurcation diagram for the logistic map. It shows the attractor values, like and , as a function of the parameter .

Logistic map

The logistic map is

where is a function of the (discrete) time .[3] The parameter is assumed to lie in the interval , in which case is bounded on .

For between 1 and 3, converges to the stable fixed point . Then, for between 3 and 3.44949, converges to a permanent oscillation between two values and that depend on . As grows larger, oscillations between 4 values, then 8, 16, 32, etc. appear. These period doublings culminate at , beyond which more complex regimes appear. As increases, there are some intervals where most starting values will converge to one or a small number of stable oscillations, such as near .

In the interval where the period is for some positive integer , not all the points actually have period . These are single points, rather than intervals. These points are said to be in unstable orbits, since nearby points do not approach the same orbit as them.

quadratic map

Real version of complex quadratic map is related with real slice of the Mandelbrot set.

Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation

Period doubling in the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation with periodic boundary conditions. The curves depict solutions of the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation projected onto the energy phase plane (E, dE/dt), where E is the L2-norm of the solution. For ν = 0.056, there exists a periodic orbit with period T ≈ 1.1759. Near ν ≈ 0.0558, this solution splits into 2 orbits, which further separate as ν is decreased. Exactly at the transitional value of ν, the new orbit (red-dashed) has double the period of the original. (However, as ν increases further, the ratio of periods deviates from exactly 2.)

The Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation is an example of a spatiotemporally continuous dynamical system that exhibits period doubling. It is one of the most well-studied nonlinear partial differential equations, originally introduced as a model of flame front propagation.[4]

The one-dimensional Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation is

A common choice for boundary conditions is spatial periodicity: .

For large values of , evolves toward steady (time-independent) solutions or simple periodic orbits. As is decreased, the dynamics eventually develops chaos. The transition from order to chaos occurs via a cascade of period-doubling bifurcations,[5][6] one of which is illustrated in the figure.

Logistic map for a modified Phillips curve

Consider the following logistical map for a modified Phillips curve:

where :

  • is the actual inflation
  • is the expected inflation,
  • u is the level of unemployment,
  • is the money supply growth rate.

Keeping and varying , the system undergoes period-doubling bifurcations and ultimately becomes chaotic.

Experimental observation

Period doubling has been observed in a number of experimental systems.[7] There is also experimental evidence of period-doubling cascades. For example, sequences of 4 period doublings have been observed in the dynamics of convection rolls in water and mercury.[8][9] Similarly, 4-5 doublings have been observed in certain nonlinear electronic circuits.[10][11][12] However, the experimental precision required to detect the ith doubling event in a cascade increases exponentially with i, making it difficult to observe more than 5 doubling events in a cascade.[13]

See also

Notes

  1. Alligood (1996) et al., p. 532
  2. Thorne, Kip S.; Blandford, Roger D. (2017). Modern Classical Physics: Optics, Fluids, Plasmas, Elasticity, Relativity, and Statistical Physics. Princeton University Press. pp. 825–834. ISBN 9780691159027.
  3. Strogatz (2015), pp. 360–373
  4. Kalogirou, A.; Keaveny, E. E.; Papageorgiou, D. T. (2015). "An in-depth numerical study of the two-dimensional Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equation". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 471 (2179): 20140932. Bibcode:2015RSPSA.47140932K. doi:10.1098/rspa.2014.0932. ISSN 1364-5021. PMC 4528647. PMID 26345218.
  5. Smyrlis, Y. S.; Papageorgiou, D. T. (1991). "Predicting chaos for infinite dimensional dynamical systems: the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, a case study". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 88 (24): 11129–11132. Bibcode:1991PNAS...8811129S. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.24.11129. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 53087. PMID 11607246.
  6. Papageorgiou, D.T.; Smyrlis, Y.S. (1991), "The route to chaos for the Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation", Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 3 (1): 15–42, Bibcode:1991ThCFD...3...15P, doi:10.1007/BF00271514, hdl:2060/19910004329, ISSN 1432-2250, S2CID 116955014
  7. see Strogatz (2015) for a review
  8. Giglio, Marzio; Musazzi, Sergio; Perini, Umberto (1981). "Transition to Chaotic Behavior via a Reproducible Sequence of Period-Doubling Bifurcations". Physical Review Letters. 47 (4): 243–246. Bibcode:1981PhRvL..47..243G. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.243. ISSN 0031-9007.
  9. Libchaber, A.; Laroche, C.; Fauve, S. (1982). "Period doubling cascade in mercury, a quantitative measurement" (PDF). Journal de Physique Lettres. 43 (7): 211–216. doi:10.1051/jphyslet:01982004307021100. ISSN 0302-072X.
  10. Linsay, Paul S. (1981). "Period Doubling and Chaotic Behavior in a Driven Anharmonic Oscillator". Physical Review Letters. 47 (19): 1349–1352. Bibcode:1981PhRvL..47.1349L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1349. ISSN 0031-9007.
  11. Testa, James; Pérez, José; Jeffries, Carson (1982). "Evidence for Universal Chaotic Behavior of a Driven Nonlinear Oscillator". Physical Review Letters. 48 (11): 714–717. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..48..714T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.48.714. ISSN 0031-9007.
  12. Arecchi, F. T.; Lisi, F. (1982). "Hopping Mechanism Generating1fNoise in Nonlinear Systems". Physical Review Letters. 49 (2): 94–98. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49...94A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.94. ISSN 0031-9007.
  13. Strogatz (2015), pp. 360–373

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.