121

Does Java have an equivalent to Python's range(int, int) method?

Karl Knechtel
  • 62,466
  • 11
  • 102
  • 153
Nick Heiner
  • 119,074
  • 188
  • 476
  • 699
  • 1
    Do you mean a Python 2.x range which returns a list, or a Python 3.x range which returns an iterator (equivalent to the 2.x xrange)? The former is relatively simple to implement as others have done below, but the iterator version is a bit more tricky. – Dave Kirby Sep 24 '10 at 21:13
  • http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16570091/for-loop-like-python-range-function/31867991#31867991 – zengr Aug 19 '15 at 23:32
  • For a range of any `Comparable` s see [this](https://stackoverflow.com/a/50245738/3992939) answer – c0der May 09 '18 at 04:55
  • For a range with stepping see [this](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58052429/python-like-range-with-stepping-in-pure-java/58058221) – Sławomir Lenart Sep 23 '19 at 10:08

14 Answers14

253

Old question, new answer (for Java 8)

IntStream.range(0, 10).forEach(n -> System.out.println(n));

or with method references:

IntStream.range(0, 10).forEach(System.out::println);
Jacob van Lingen
  • 8,989
  • 7
  • 48
  • 78
jhodges
  • 3,065
  • 2
  • 17
  • 9
30

Guava also provides something similar to Python's range:

Range.closed(1, 5).asSet(DiscreteDomains.integers());

You can also implement a fairly simple iterator to do the same sort of thing using Guava's AbstractIterator:

return new AbstractIterator<Integer>() {
  int next = getStart();

  @Override protected Integer computeNext() {
    if (isBeyondEnd(next)) {
      return endOfData();
    }
    Integer result = next;
    next = next + getStep();
    return result;
  }
};
Simon Steele
  • 11,558
  • 4
  • 45
  • 67
17

I'm working on a little Java utils library called Jools, and it contains a class Range which provides the functionality you need (there's a downloadable JAR).
Constructors are either Range(int stop), Range(int start, int stop), or Range(int start, int stop, int step) (similiar to a for loop) and you can either iterate through it, which used lazy evaluation, or you can use its toList() method to explicitly get the range list.

for (int i : new Range(10)) {...} // i = 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9

for (int i : new Range(4,10)) {...} // i = 4,5,6,7,8,9

for (int i : new Range(0,10,2)) {...} // i = 0,2,4,6,8

Range range = new Range(0,10,2);
range.toList(); // [0,2,4,6,8]
Amir Rachum
  • 76,817
  • 74
  • 166
  • 248
16

Since Guava 15.0, Range.asSet() has been deprecated and is scheduled to be removed in version 16. Use the following instead:

ContiguousSet.create(Range.closed(1, 5), DiscreteDomain.integers());
jiehanzheng
  • 993
  • 13
  • 12
16

You can use the following code snippet in order to get a range set of integers:

    Set<Integer> iset = IntStream.rangeClosed(1, 5).boxed().collect
            (Collectors.toSet());
Julian
  • 1,694
  • 22
  • 29
15
public int[] range(int start, int stop)
{
   int[] result = new int[stop-start];

   for(int i=0;i<stop-start;i++)
      result[i] = start+i;

   return result;
}

Forgive any syntax or style errors; I normally program in C#.

KeithS
  • 70,210
  • 21
  • 112
  • 164
  • given that Vivien Barousse beat you to an answer, why don't you delete yours to avoid any dup. Unless you really plan to nicely flesh it out of course. – aaronasterling Sep 24 '10 at 19:24
  • 9
    They're similar; I think mine's a little more readable. His use of "length" is misleading, and I don't think his meets the Python spec (he includes the upper bound, which http://www.network-theory.co.uk/docs/pytut/rangeFunction.html says doesn't happen in Python). If you think one's a dupe, I believe you have sufficient reputation to deal with it yourself. – KeithS Sep 24 '10 at 20:06
9
public int[] range(int start, int length) {
    int[] range = new int[length - start + 1];
    for (int i = start; i <= length; i++) {
        range[i - start] = i;
    }
    return range;
}

(Long answer just to say "No")

Vivien Barousse
  • 20,555
  • 2
  • 63
  • 64
  • Also, see that "range" in python 3 and the preferred "xrange" in Python 2 return a "live" object that does not use up memory for each item it contains. That would be even bigger to implement in Java. – jsbueno Sep 25 '10 at 00:58
4

Java 9 - IntStream::iterate

Since Java 9 you can use IntStream::iterate and you can even customize the step. For example if you want int array :

public static int[] getInRange(final int min, final int max, final int step) {
    return IntStream.iterate(min, i -> i < max, i -> i + step)
            .toArray();
}

or List :

public static List<Integer> getInRange(final int min, final int max, final int step) {
    return IntStream.iterate(min, i -> i < max, i -> i + step)
            .boxed()
            .collect(Collectors.toList());
}

And then use it :

int[] range = getInRange(0, 10, 1);
Community
  • 1
  • 1
Michał Krzywański
  • 15,659
  • 4
  • 36
  • 63
3
IntStream.range(0, 10).boxed().collect(Collectors.toUnmodifiableList());
pchopinet
  • 31
  • 1
  • 4
2

Groovy's nifty Range class can be used from Java, though it's certainly not as groovy.

John
  • 1,322
  • 14
  • 26
2

The "Functional Java" library allows to program in such a way to a limited degree, it has a range() method creating an fj.data.Array instance.

See:

Similarly the "Totally Lazy" library offers a lazy range method: http://code.google.com/p/totallylazy/

tkruse
  • 10,222
  • 7
  • 53
  • 80
2

I know this is an old post but if you are looking for a solution that returns an object stream and don't want to or can't use any additional dependencies:

Stream.iterate(start, n -> n + 1).limit(stop);

start - inclusive stop - exclusive

HDubz
  • 167
  • 1
  • 2
  • 14
1

If you mean to use it like you would in a Python loop, Java loops nicely with the for statement, which renders this structure unnecessary for that purpose.

Nikki9696
  • 6,260
  • 1
  • 28
  • 23
1

Java 8

private static int[] range(int start, int stop, int step) {
    int[] result = new int[(stop-start)%step == 0 ? (stop-start)/step : (stop-start)/step+1];
    int count = 0;
    Function<Integer, Boolean> condition = step > 0 ? (x) -> x < stop : (x) -> x > stop;
    for (int i = start; condition.apply(i); i += step) {
        result[count] = i;
        count++;
    }
    return result;
}
Sergey
  • 11
  • 2
  • Welcome to StackOverflow. While this code may solve the question, [including an explanation](https://meta.stackexchange.com/q/114762) of how and why this solves the problem would really help to improve the quality of your post, and probably result in more up-votes. Remember that you are answering the question for readers in the future, not just the person asking now. Please [edit](https://stackoverflow.com/posts/65020704/edit) your answer to add explanations and give an indication of what limitations and assumptions apply. – Ruli Nov 26 '20 at 11:48