31

It is suggested that IDisposable objects should be disposed in either using statement or by calling Dispose() method. I find it is not intuitive to find out if an object is disposable in Visual Studio.

My question is: is there any way to recognize IDisposable objects in VS?

T D Nguyen
  • 7,054
  • 4
  • 51
  • 71
  • 3
    Why not simply check the classes you use for the `IDisposable` interface and use a `using` statement to instanciate those? – Alejandro Apr 26 '17 at 13:10
  • 2
    the intellisense will tell you if it has a dispose method implemented – chris-crush-code Apr 26 '17 at 13:10
  • I find it is not intuitive to see the implemented interfaces in VS compared to Java IDE. May be Im new to VS!! – T D Nguyen Apr 26 '17 at 13:12
  • @chris-crush-code While correct in most cases, there's no reason you can't put a `Dispose()` method on an object you create without implementing `IDisposable`. – krillgar Apr 26 '17 at 14:29
  • Right click on the object in question, select Go To Definition, there you can see how it's implemented. (you might have to go up the stack multiple times) – mxmissile Apr 26 '17 at 14:58
  • @mxmissile Note I have [already answered this](http://stackoverflow.com/a/43636775/4631427). – TheLethalCoder Apr 26 '17 at 16:02
  • For what it's worth, there are some things that implement `IDisposable` that you probably don't need to worry about disposing. https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/pfxteam/2012/03/25/do-i-need-to-dispose-of-tasks/ – ta.speot.is Apr 27 '17 at 08:55

9 Answers9

29

If you want to highlight disposable objects differently in VS please check out this post. I personally prefer Resharper answer as I always use R#.

If you just want to figure out if your object is an instance of some interface you can right-button-click on the variable name and Navigate -> Object Browser or Go to Declaration and then right-button-click on class name Go to Definition/Peek Definition.

enter image description here

You might like Peek Definition as it shows everything you need inline:

enter image description here

You can always check what methods object has, if it has Dispose() method then 99.9% it's a disposable object. I'll give this 0.01% for those who give methods bad names :).

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Andrei
  • 42,814
  • 35
  • 154
  • 218
  • Don´t forget the types in you 0.01 % that implement `IDisposable` explicitly. But mostly these types provide a `Close()` method. – Jehof Apr 27 '17 at 12:09
24

I'm surprised that no-one else has mentioned this yet. If your edition of Visual Studio supports it, I'd suggest turning on Code Analysis for Build.

Once that's done, pick whatever rule sets you like so long as they ensure that, at the least, CA2000 (Dispose objects before losing scope), CA2213 (Disposable fields should be disposed) and CA2202 (Do not dispose objects multiple times) rules are covered. That way, the compiler should shout at you if you're not dealing with disposable objects correctly.

(Although note that getting the compiler to not flag some usage of disposable objects can then turn into the bigger challenge, as many StackOverflow questions can attest)

Damien_The_Unbeliever
  • 234,701
  • 27
  • 340
  • 448
  • Can you edit in what these rules are? I have no idea what `CA2213` is and I shouldn't have to go to an external link to find out. – TheLethalCoder May 03 '17 at 13:15
  • 1
    @TheLethalCoder - I've edited in the rule names. I don't see much value in putting anything further in. I'm linking to the full documentation and even if the links do go bad I'm giving the Code Analysis codes which should remain stable. – Damien_The_Unbeliever May 03 '17 at 13:26
  • TIPS: You may need to install the MIcrosoft Code Analysis plugin into Visual Studio or the Nuget package into your project. You will probably want to go Project > References > Analysers > Open Active Rule Set > (Make Changes) > Save As > (file in solution folder). You then need to update the csproj to use the newly saved rule set. You may need VS Enterprise also? – Andy Joiner Oct 15 '20 at 23:34
8

You can use Object Browser to view class inheritance hierarchy with implemented interfaces

enter image description here

Aleksey L.
  • 35,047
  • 10
  • 74
  • 84
6

For the sake of completeness, if you don't ask how to check it in your code but you just want to know where you can look if the type implements an interface like IDisposable, you can always look at MSDN.

For example FileStream

  • it's already mentioned in the remarks section:

This type implements the IDisposable interface. When you have finished using the type, you should dispose of it either directly or indirectly. To dispose of the type directly, call its Dispose method in a try/catch block. To dispose of it indirectly, use a language construct such as using (in C#) or Using (in Visual Basic). For more information, see the “Using an Object that Implements IDisposable” section in the IDisposable interface topic.

  • or search for the Dispose method. There you can see if this class or any parent class implements IDispable. In this case it is inherited from Stream which implements that interface which is mentioned at the class syntax and in the remarks section.

    public abstract class Stream : MarshalByRefObject, IDisposable
    

If you want to know how to find implementations of an interface in Visual Studio, here is already a question that answers that:

How do you find all implementations of an interface?

Community
  • 1
  • 1
Tim Schmelter
  • 450,073
  • 74
  • 686
  • 939
  • I can find interfaces easily in Java (less than 1 sec) but I find it is quite hard to see it in C#. Searching for IDisapsable is much slower. – T D Nguyen Apr 26 '17 at 13:22
  • @TDNguyen How do you do it in Java? – DavidG Apr 26 '17 at 13:25
  • @TDNguyen. Yes; i'm missing also a list of all interfaces that a type implements either directly or indirectly through parent types. There's only an inheritance hierarchy that doesn't contain the interfaces. – Tim Schmelter Apr 26 '17 at 13:25
  • @DavidG: in the javadocs you see all implenented interfaces directly at the top of a type: https://docs.oracle.com/javase/7/docs/api/java/io/FileReader.html – Tim Schmelter Apr 26 '17 at 13:28
  • @TDNguyen the easist way is to search on google, just do `msdn YourClassHere` and the first result is almost always the microsoft MSDN page for the class that tells you all the information for it. – Scott Chamberlain Apr 26 '17 at 13:28
  • @ScottChamberlain: yes, but i'm missing a list of all implemented interfaces of a given type in MSDN. You have to click through all classes in the inheritance hierarchy – Tim Schmelter Apr 26 '17 at 13:30
  • @TimSchmelter true, one easy way to get that list though is to do the "Navigate to Metadata" in Visual Studio it shows the inherited interfaces in that view. It also has the added benifit of working on any types instead of just the framework ones. – Scott Chamberlain Apr 26 '17 at 13:31
  • @TimSchmelter Yes, but OP implies it's an IDE thing, not a docs thing. Also, docs will only help for framework types, not custom ones. – DavidG Apr 26 '17 at 13:32
  • I'm now thinking we should dupe this to your linked question. – DavidG Apr 26 '17 at 13:41
5

A way to see what interfaces a class implements, along with all of it's publicly exposed fields, properties, methods etc. is to go to that class in the code. For example:

Image image = Image.FromFile(path);

Make sure you click on the class, not the instance and press F12. This will take you to a metadata file for that class. For example: the Image.cs file has the following above class declaration:

public abstract class Image : MarshalByRefObject, ISerializable, ICloneable, IDisposable

You can then also use F12 to click through to other classes. Note that these classes are usually shown up in the Light Blue colour in Visual Studio:

Screenshot showing light blue colours.

You can also get to this meta data file by right clicking on the class and selecting "Go To Definition" from the drop down list.


Though not ideal you can also go to an instance of the class and put a . on the end. This should bring up the intellisense and you will be able to see Dispsose() in the list if the item implements the interface.

You could also just write myInstance.Dispose(); or using (myInstance = new MyClass()) {} and if it compiles the class implements the interface else it doesn't.

TheLethalCoder
  • 6,668
  • 6
  • 34
  • 69
4

As a (silly?) alternative to shelling out for Resharper and its ilk, Visual Studio does have the concept of External Tools (in the Tools menu), which you could (ab)use to do something like:

  • Title: Is Disposa&ble
  • Command: C:\Windows\System32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\powershell.exe
  • Arguments: -Command "&{$i=[Type]::GetType('System.IDisposable');[AppDomain]::CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()|%{ $_.GetTypes()}|?{$_.FullName.EndsWith('.$(CurText)')}|%{New-Object PSObject -Property @{'Type'=$_;'IDisposable'=$i.IsAssignableFrom($_)}}|ft}"
  • Use Output window: checked

This would read whatever string you had selected in the editor, search for .NET types with that string as a name and show a True/False as to whether that string implemented IDisposable.

The Powershell command in the tool is just the quickest approach I could do to demonstrate the possibility, but it is far from perfect -- it only finds types in assemblies that Powershell loads by default. If you wanted to expand on the idea, you could build a command-line .NET app that loaded your project and scanned all the assemblies that your project loaded.

If you highlighted the word Stream in your code, for example, and ran your external tool (ALT+T,ALT+B in the example), it would return:

Type             IDisposable
----             -----------
System.IO.Stream        True

To break down the Powershell command:

&{ $i=[Type]::GetType('System.IDisposable');        # Get the IDisposable interface
   [AppDomain]::CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies() `     # Get all loaded assemblies
    | %{ $_.GetTypes() } `                          # For each assembly, get all types
    | ?{ $_.FullName.EndsWith('.$(CurText)') } `    # Filter types that are named $(CurText) - $(CurText) is a macro within VS External Tools
    | %{ New-Object PSObject -Property @{           # For each type, return an object containing...
         'Type' = $_;                               # ...the type name...
         'IDisposable' = $i.IsAssignableFrom($_)    # ...and whether the IDisposable interface is implemented
       } } `
    | ft }                                          # Format all returned objects as a table
jimbobmcgee
  • 1,561
  • 11
  • 34
  • Like you said this snippet of PowerShell could use a few improvements, but as a proof-of-concept starting point this is great, not silly. After the initial setup this should be the quickest way to determine if the selected text is a type that implements `IDisposable` _without_ the need for third-party tools or traipsing through the hierarchy manually. +1! – Lance U. Matthews Apr 27 '17 at 00:30
2

Easiest way to find out this is by using memory warning in Code Analysis.

  1. Enable Code Analysis to "Run on build" on project properties. enter image description here

  2. Look for following warnings after build

CA2000

A local object of an IDisposable type is created, but the object is not disposed before all references to the object are out of scope.

CA2213

A type that implements System.IDisposable declares fields that are of types that also implement IDisposable. The Dispose method of the field is not called by the Dispose method of the declaring type.

enter image description here

CharithJ
  • 46,289
  • 20
  • 116
  • 131
-1

either using or in Dispose() method Use the using construct when you can. Here's why. Using this MSDN example, here are two equivalent blocks of code. This one with using:

using (Font font1 = new Font("Arial", 10.0f)) 
{
    byte charset = font1.GdiCharSet;
}

This one without using:

{
    Font font1 = new Font("Arial", 10.0f);
    try
    {
        byte charset = font1.GdiCharSet;
    }
    finally
    {
        if (font1 != null)
            ((IDisposable)font1).Dispose();
    }
}

Each part of the second block is there for a reason: the curly braces, the try-finally, the null check, and the cast to IDisposable. No one should be expected to remember this. That's why the using construct exists.

user2023861
  • 8,030
  • 9
  • 57
  • 86
  • 1
    I think the question is not _why_ one should use `using`/`Dispose()`, but rather how to recognize which objects implement `IDisposable` and, therefore, should be handled by using `using`/`Dispose()`. In other words, you say "Use the `using` construct when you can" and the question is asking "In Visual Studio, how do I know 'when I can'?" – Lance U. Matthews Apr 27 '17 at 00:18
-3

Something clean that can be done in C#7

class Foo : IDisposable {
    string _bar = "init";
    void Fooy() { _bar = "fooy"; }

    public void Dispose() {
        _bar = null;       
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        var v = new Foo();
        Console.WriteLine(v._bar);
        if(v is IDisposable id) using(id)
            v.Fooy();
        else
            v.Fooy();

        Console.WriteLine(v._bar ?? "null");;

    }
}

Fooy could be some virtual or abstract function. Some base classes may implement IDisposable while others not. Try running the above code. The console will print different text depending whether or not IDisposable has been implemented

John ClearZ
  • 952
  • 2
  • 9
  • 16
  • v.Fooy() else v.Fooy()? Is that a typo? – 15ee8f99-57ff-4f92-890c-b56153 Apr 26 '17 at 17:07
  • 3
    @EdPlunkett I think calling the same method on both sides of the `if` is "correct" (though I don't agree that it's "clean"). The idea is to call `v.Fooy()` whether or not `v` implements `IDisposable`, then dispose of `v` (via `using`) if it does implement `IDisposable`. Perhaps translating `using` to `try`/`finally` would make it clearer: `try { v.Fooy(); } finally { if (v is IDisposable id) id.Dispose(); }`, but it still seems like a runtime solution to an IDE/documentation issue. – Lance U. Matthews Apr 27 '17 at 00:11
  • Your right BACON. That would be the way to go about doing it. I was just playing around with some CS7 code. – John ClearZ Apr 27 '17 at 17:53
  • @BACON Ahhh, now I see. The purpose is just to get `using(id)` in there. Thank you. – 15ee8f99-57ff-4f92-890c-b56153 Apr 28 '17 at 16:14