On Weblogic JEE 7 (version 12.2.1.2), I am finding it quite strange to understand the behavior of the application server in relation to the enablement and configuration of the JAX-RS web services.
The first point that I am trying to understand is a phenomena that I find quite inexplicable. On a sample application where I was testing a trivial jax-rs web service where initially there were only to components:
Component (A)
@ApplicationPath("rest")
public class RestApplication extends Application {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(RestApplication.class);
// Class loading
{
LOGGER.info("Rest application static constructor invoked");
}
/**
* Default not arguments constructor
*/
public RestApplication() {
LOGGER.info("Rest application default constructore invoked.");
}
}
Which appropriately enables the base context for all rest endpoints you may want to use in your deployment. Works exactly as in Wildfly - 100%. So nothing to say about this component.
And then we enter the "swamp", component B, our rest endpoint. There are several dummy apis on this dummy endpoint, we focus just on the most trivial of all.
@Path("/exampleRestEndpoint")
@Consumes({ "application/json", "text/html" })
@Produces({ "application/json" })
public class ExampleRestEndpoint {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(ExampleRestEndpoint.class);
@PostConstruct
public void postConstruct() {
LOGGER.info("Rest Endpoint constructed.");
}
@GET
@Path("/ping")
public BasicJsonResponseDto<String> ping() {
Instant date = Instant.now();
return new BasicJsonResponseDto<String>("Ping-service invoked successfully. " + date.toString());
}
}
I will go into details on the DTO class later at the bottom. There are already points of discussion here.
The first point of discussion for me is the the metadata annotation at the top of the class that declares that for this endpoint we want to deliver back to the clients application/json.
But on my first writing of this annotation, I had in fact not added ANY such anotation. So on my first implementation, the application server was working returning me a reply. On a second step, when I added the annotation stating that the rest endpoint was to be returing applicaiton/json, weblogic stopped rendering any response complaining of the following:
SEVERE: MessageBodyWriter not found for media type=application/json, type=class com.jersey.jaxb.Todo, genericType=class com.jersey.jaxb.Todo.
Same experiment on wildfly, the endpoint worked immediately no major hassle. The following stack overflow thread yielded me an answer that worked: test serializations REST JAXRS
The fact that weblogic would complain that it knows of know body writers that are capable of redering this mime type is suprising to me, being that any JEE 7 container should be able of doing this out of the box... but ok!
On my pom for the sample application I pumped the following dependencies to be going into war, in the Web-inf/lib.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-jaxrs-json-provider</artifactId>
<version>2.8.6</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.module</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-module-jaxb-annotations</artifactId>
<version>2.8.6</version>
</dependency>
And problem solved. The rest web service goes back to working. On chrome I can control the http response metadata all perfect.
Funy thing now, when I deploy the same application and take away the jackson provider library, the rest endpoint continues to work without any problems. Actually, I can no longer reproduce on my environment the weblogic complaint that I am not giving him any body writer that knows what to do with application/json replies.
So, this is my first question? Does anybody know if for a basic rest service that deliver application/json where a sample application bundles no jackson library and jus uses jee7 apis, if weblogic is expected to be logging the error I quoted or not. Does anybody have any sort of oncept/explanation for the fact that when I take away the dependencies things are just working as one would normally have expected from the start ... but not as one expect after having been forced to google a solution for the no body writer problem? I really do not have an explanation for this...
Now the second point is to do with the class being used a return object on the /ping API i have quoted.
Originally, that endpoing API was returning a pure "String". The ping message was not being wrapped in any sort of object. And of course the result object was no real JSON object The return object was just a "some arbitrary string value".
So this of course is a problem for a rest client, that is expecting to de-serialize valid json and instead of getting an object or array, is getting pure raw data on the pipe.
For this reason, I then made the experiment of pumping the raw types like String and Integer under a support dto object.
Here is the implementation. The implementation is important for the next question.
@JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include = As.PROPERTY, property = "class")
public class BasicJsonResponseDto<T> implements Serializable {
T value;
public BasicJsonResponseDto() {
super();
}
public BasicJsonResponseDto(T value) {
super();
this.value = value;
}
public T getValue() {
return value;
}
public void setValue(T value) {
this.value = value;
}
@Override
public String toString() {
return "BasicJsonResponseDto [value=" + value + "]";
}
}
For the sharper eyes, it will be immediately be obvious that when a response object to an endpoint is delivered via a class like this, the "de-serialization" logic is not a trivial task at all. This wrapper object for the basic types Integer/String has a little be of poison in there. Namely, the value T where we pump our ping string into gives no help for the de-serialization engine to figure out what object it is to expect to read out.
So the ping service, technically, is not trivial at all for the client-side code.
With that said, I now have two very different behaviors on Weblogic and Wildfly. And the different must be directly related with the serialization technology that each is using.
When the ping service is executed on weblogic, right now, the reponse objects I get are of the form:
{"value":{"type":"string","value":"Ping-service invoked successfully. 2017-08-12T09:08:45.455Z"}}
So you see that whatever ObjectMapper weblogic is using and that I have definitely not configured, is by default pumping additional metadata aboute the T value, namely declaring it as a string. (a) It is very cute that this done without my asking, but then on the client side I need to create an ObjectMapper to de-serialize that can interpret that same object medata. Most likely there is an adequate set of annotation such as @JsonInfo with @JsonSubtype that I can add to the T value field to make the de-serialization work on the client side, but in terms of the DTO object that I have written I have not asked for any such metadata to go out.
(b) You will also notice, if you know jackson, that there is missing information on the object as well. namely, I do not see the class="full.qualified.name" to my object. But I have made sure I requested this metadata to go out on the response json by pumping this annotation into the class.
@JsonTypeInfo(use = JsonTypeInfo.Id.CLASS, include = As.PROPERTY, property = "class")
So my question here is: (1) What library exactly is weblogic using to serialize my json (2) What default configurations do they have in there (3) I have pumped into my pom.xml the "jackson-jaxrs-json-provider" dependency that originally make my endpoint work. I have looked at the source code of this library, and it looks to me like this library tries to be in charge of the rendering of the json responses. It does have a CDI @Provide @Consumes(/) Produces(/), and if I enable the debugger I can see during deployment that the jackson-jaxrs-json-provider gets invoked.
What I cannot see happening in weblogic is the ObjectMapper of this class ever getting called. it is if I cannot override whatever default behavior is in charge right now.
Does anybody understand the behavior. Are there ways to put the beast on a leash and take control of the situation? Or do I have to trivialize the code to such a degree where my String wrapped object is named" StringWrappedDto and the value field is trviailized into String value. I hope not, but right now I am struggling with this.
Now, we switch to Wildfly 10.1.0. On Wildfly 10.1.0, my experience is things are going rather more according to expectation.
(a) If you deploy a WAR with just the RestApplication and the Endpoint I have provided. Things work out of the box. No hassle, no messages of incapacity to render application/json. You are set to start working without taking control of any configuration.
(b) If you for example want to override the rendering behavior for Json, you can define your own ObjectMapper provider. E.g.
public class ObjectMapperContextResolver implements ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> {
private final ObjectMapper mapper;
public ObjectMapperContextResolver() {
mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.disable(SerializationFeature.FAIL_ON_EMPTY_BEANS);
}
@Override
public ObjectMapper getContext(Class<?> type) {
return mapper;
}
}
And this guy here, if you debug it, you can see it get called on every call to the Ping service. So you can take charge of how the json response will be serialized, if you need such level of control.
To conclude, on wildfly, the JSON response I get is what I expect as illustrated in the following quote:
{"class":"entrypoint.rest.BasicJsonResponse","value":"Ping-service invoked successfully. 2017-08-12T16:42:13.788Z"}
I have tried setting breakpoints on almost every classon from jackson 2 that is involved in serialization of data, and literrally nothing gets hit on weblogic. So I am pretty certain, something in the wlserver/modules is getting used.
Anyone has an idea of how to force jackson2 declared as dependency to the war to get used for serializaton and kill whatever default behavior is right now taking place?
-- It now starts being clear what is happening in the rendering. I have written the following unit test as an experiment:
@Test
public void serializeJerseyTest() throws JsonProcessingException, JAXBException {
// (a) class to be marshalled into json
BasicJsonResponseDto<String> objectToSerialize = new BasicJsonResponseDto<String>(
"Ping-service invoked successfully. " + Instant.now().toString());
// (b) setup a jaxbcontext
Map<String, Object> properties = new HashMap<String, Object>(3);
JAXBContext jc = JAXBContext.newInstance(BasicStringJsonResponseDto.class);
// (c) Marshall to system out
Marshaller marshaller = jc.createMarshaller();
marshaller.setProperty(Marshaller.JAXB_FORMATTED_OUTPUT, true);
marshaller.setProperty("eclipselink.media-type", "application/json");
marshaller.setProperty("eclipselink.media-type", "application/json");
marshaller.marshal(objectToSerialize, System.out);
}
And the output of the unit test looks quite familiar...
{
"value" : {
"type" : "string",
"value" : "Ping-service invoked successfully. 2017-08-12T19:33:05.834Z"
}
Oracle is using Moxy to make the json... So now the question is, how do I make it use jackson2 instead?
I am sure there is a way. Proably to be found on the jersey documentation, which I believe by default will want to use Moxy.
For future, reference, I will be now posting a debug stack trace that speaks volumes. All the code I was trying to debug and could not find out how because I wasll the the time trying to set breakpoints on jackson when the implementation was jersey + moxy all along. So here is the answer to that.
I came to this stack trace for the most rediculous reason in the world. Moxy out of the box canont deserialize the JSON object it is producing for this web service. Can anyone understand this? That moxy is serializing me som json on the POJO but then the unmarshall cannot properly unsmarshall the value field? So here is the stack trace:
Daemon Thread [[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '4' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'] (Suspended (breakpoint at line 51 in entrypoint.rest.ObjectAdapter))
entrypoint.rest.ObjectAdapter.marshal(java.lang.Object) line: 51
entrypoint.rest.ObjectAdapter.marshal(java.lang.Object) line: 1
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.jaxb.XMLJavaTypeConverter.convertObjectValueToDataValue(java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.sessions.Session, org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller) line: 178
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.mappings.XMLAnyObjectMapping.convertObjectValueToDataValue(java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.sessions.Session, org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller) line: 652
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.mappings.XMLAnyObjectMapping.convertObjectValueToDataValue(java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.core.sessions.CoreSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.Marshaller) line: 1
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLAnyObjectMappingNodeValue.marshalSingleValue(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, java.lang.Object, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NamespaceResolver, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalContext) line: 72
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLAnyObjectMappingNodeValue.marshal(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NamespaceResolver, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalContext) line: 65
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLAnyObjectMappingNodeValue(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NodeValue).marshal(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NamespaceResolver, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalContext, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 102
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.ObjectMarshalContext.marshal(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NodeValue, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NamespaceResolver, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 59
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathNode.marshal(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.NamespaceResolver, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.Marshaller, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.MarshalContext, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 443
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathObjectBuilder.buildRow(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.XMLRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.Marshaller, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 243
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.TreeObjectBuilder.buildRow(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.XMLRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLMarshaller, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 118
org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.TreeObjectBuilder.buildRow(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.record.XMLRecord, java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.core.sessions.CoreAbstractSession, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.Marshaller, org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XPathFragment) line: 1
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLMarshaller<ABSTRACT_SESSION,CHARACTER_ESCAPE_HANDLER,CONTEXT,DESCRIPTOR,MARSHALLER_LISTENER,MEDIA_TYPE,NAMESPACE_PREFIX_MAPPER,OBJECT_BUILDER,SESSION>).marshal(java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, ABSTRACT_SESSION, DESCRIPTOR, boolean) line: 766
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLMarshaller<ABSTRACT_SESSION,CHARACTER_ESCAPE_HANDLER,CONTEXT,DESCRIPTOR,MARSHALLER_LISTENER,MEDIA_TYPE,NAMESPACE_PREFIX_MAPPER,OBJECT_BUILDER,SESSION>).marshalStreamOrWriter(java.lang.Object, org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.record.MarshalRecord, ABSTRACT_SESSION, DESCRIPTOR, boolean) line: 1147
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLMarshaller<ABSTRACT_SESSION,CHARACTER_ESCAPE_HANDLER,CONTEXT,DESCRIPTOR,MARSHALLER_LISTENER,MEDIA_TYPE,NAMESPACE_PREFIX_MAPPER,OBJECT_BUILDER,SESSION>).marshal(java.lang.Object, java.io.OutputStream, ABSTRACT_SESSION, DESCRIPTOR) line: 934
org.eclipse.persistence.oxm.XMLMarshaller(org.eclipse.persistence.internal.oxm.XMLMarshaller<ABSTRACT_SESSION,CHARACTER_ESCAPE_HANDLER,CONTEXT,DESCRIPTOR,MARSHALLER_LISTENER,MEDIA_TYPE,NAMESPACE_PREFIX_MAPPER,OBJECT_BUILDER,SESSION>).marshal(java.lang.Object, java.io.OutputStream) line: 877
org.eclipse.persistence.jaxb.JAXBMarshaller.marshal(java.lang.Object, java.io.OutputStream) line: 496
org.glassfish.jersey.moxy.json.internal.ConfigurableMoxyJsonProvider(org.eclipse.persistence.jaxb.rs.MOXyJsonProvider).writeTo(java.lang.Object, java.lang.Class<?>, java.lang.reflect.Type, java.lang.annotation.Annotation[], javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType, javax.ws.rs.core.MultivaluedMap<java.lang.String,java.lang.Object>, java.io.OutputStream) line: 957
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor$TerminalWriterInterceptor.invokeWriteTo(javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptorContext, javax.ws.rs.ext.MessageBodyWriter) line: 265
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor$TerminalWriterInterceptor.aroundWriteTo(javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptorContext) line: 250
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor.proceed() line: 162
org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.JsonWithPaddingInterceptor.aroundWriteTo(javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptorContext) line: 106
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor.proceed() line: 162
org.glassfish.jersey.server.internal.MappableExceptionWrapperInterceptor.aroundWriteTo(javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptorContext) line: 86
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor.proceed() line: 162
weblogic.jaxrs.server.internal.ChunkedOutputWriter.aroundWriteTo(javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptorContext) line: 65
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.WriterInterceptorExecutor.proceed() line: 162
org.glassfish.jersey.message.internal.MessageBodyFactory.writeTo(java.lang.Object, java.lang.Class<?>, java.lang.reflect.Type, java.lang.annotation.Annotation[], javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType, javax.ws.rs.core.MultivaluedMap<java.lang.String,java.lang.Object>, org.glassfish.jersey.internal.PropertiesDelegate, java.io.OutputStream, java.lang.Iterable<javax.ws.rs.ext.WriterInterceptor>) line: 1130
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$Responder.writeResponse(org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerResponse) line: 711
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$Responder.processResponse(org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerResponse) line: 444
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$Responder.process(org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerResponse) line: 434
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime$2.run() line: 329
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call() line: 271
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors$1.call() line: 267
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(java.util.concurrent.Callable<T>, boolean) line: 315
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(org.glassfish.jersey.internal.util.Producer<T>, boolean) line: 297
org.glassfish.jersey.internal.Errors.process(java.lang.Runnable) line: 267
org.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.RequestScope.runInScope(org.glassfish.jersey.process.internal.RequestScope$Instance, java.lang.Runnable) line: 317
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ServerRuntime.process(org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerRequest) line: 305
org.glassfish.jersey.server.ApplicationHandler.handle(org.glassfish.jersey.server.ContainerRequest) line: 1154
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.serviceImpl(java.net.URI, java.net.URI, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) line: 471
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.WebComponent.service(java.net.URI, java.net.URI, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) line: 425
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(java.net.URI, java.net.URI, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) line: 383
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) line: 336
org.glassfish.jersey.servlet.ServletContainer.service(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse) line: 223
weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run() line: 286
weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run() line: 260
weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl, javax.servlet.ServletResponse, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse, javax.servlet.Servlet) line: 137
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse, weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl) line: 350
weblogic.servlet.internal.TailFilter.doFilter(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse, javax.servlet.FilterChain) line: 25
weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse) line: 78
weblogic.servlet.internal.RequestEventsFilter.doFilter(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse, javax.servlet.FilterChain) line: 32
weblogic.servlet.internal.FilterChainImpl.doFilter(javax.servlet.ServletRequest, javax.servlet.ServletResponse) line: 78
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStub, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse) line: 3683
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run() line: 3649
weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(weblogic.security.subject.AbstractSubject, java.security.PrivilegedAction) line: 326
weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAsForUserCode(weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject, weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject, java.security.PrivilegedAction<T>) line: 197
weblogic.servlet.provider.WlsSecurityProvider.runAsForUserCode(weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject, java.security.PrivilegedAction, weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject) line: 203
weblogic.servlet.provider.WlsSubjectHandle.run(java.security.PrivilegedAction) line: 71
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.doSecuredExecute(weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletInvocationContext, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse, boolean, boolean, boolean) line: 2433
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest, javax.servlet.http.HttpServletResponse, boolean) line: 2281
weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl, weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletResponseImpl) line: 2259
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.runInternal() line: 1691
weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run() line: 1651
weblogic.servlet.provider.ContainerSupportProviderImpl$WlsRequestExecutor.run() line: 270
weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContextManager._runAs(weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContext, java.lang.Runnable) line: 348
weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContextManager.runAs(java.security.Principal, weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContext, java.lang.Runnable) line: 333
weblogic.work.LivePartitionUtility.doRunWorkUnderContext(java.lang.Runnable, weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContext) line: 54
weblogic.work.PartitionUtility.runWorkUnderContext(java.lang.Runnable, weblogic.invocation.ComponentInvocationContext) line: 41
weblogic.work.ServerWorkManagerImpl(weblogic.work.SelfTuningWorkManagerImpl).runWorkUnderContext(weblogic.work.ExecuteThread, weblogic.work.WorkAdapter) line: 640
weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(weblogic.work.WorkAdapter) line: 406
weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run() line: 346
I believe I will now search for the way to use jackson on weblogic, there is simply no way that I am going to be working around this issue by pumping the class full of jaxB annotation and on top of that be writing XmlAdapters for this. Jackson can do all of this for free. That is why when needed, Jackson will writen the @class attribute with all the neded metadata for the class to deserialize. It simply cannot be this bad. Cannot be.